2019-08-31 - Saturday - PST - Daily journal:

Salvation Debate

12:05 AM - IWA

Love is split between grace and justice.

Love is split between justice as seen in the Old Testament and grace as seen in the New Testament.

Bingozee, is that a Pocket Universe off two parallel timelines?

Love might be darker on the justice side, like that lamp or folder.

Love is personified through different kinds of people to create a colorful rainbow full of multiple shades of adventure.

Love is unconditional and eternal, like all the colors of the Pocahontas Wind.

What are the requirements for not being separated from love forever?

For by grace thou art saveth through faith, and not of works, except for the work of loving thy brother, right, which all religions agree to, right? You're saying that Christianity is NOT UNIQUE?

Then how did Christ die for you if you were not born yet?

If Christianity is not unique, then why not follow the Quran?

So, you are a Muslim?

Who cares if your scriptures is not unique, right?

If your Bible says what other religions agree with, then why not flush it down the toilet?

If there is nothing special about your Bible, then burn it, right?

If other religions agree with the main pillar of your faith, then why make a distinction?

You believe what other people believe, right?

Can you show me how you are special?

Show me a religion that disagrees with Romans 2:6.

If you are not special, then evolution must be true, right?

Religions tell us to be GOOD PEOPLE and you agree with them.

So, you are NOT A CHRISTIAN.

You believe in nothing.

I believe in transformation and you believe in evolution.

Satan agrees with what you preach.

Satan kept on saying that he will do this and he will do that and he will, he will, he will, like Obama, yes we can, it is about doing things apart from God the Father, God the Spirit, and God the Son, the Godhead Three in One Trinity.

I believe in asking Jesus to save us from sin and to turn us into new creatures with eternal residences in Heaven at the moment of conversion outside of time, being sealed as the Bible talks about. I believe God saves us. I believe we begin a relationship with the Father and with Jesus. I believe the Holy Spirit comes inside of us and that He will never ever leave us nor forsake. I believe God helps us do good works because we are saved and NOT IN ORDER TO BECOME SAVED OR IN ORDER TO REMAIN SAVED. I believe there is salvation and that there is fellowship. Also, Adam and Eve were innocent and NOT SAVED while in the garden. The Bible talks about dispensations and about Israel and different things. Don't confuse how God works with an entire nation of Israel with individual salvation. Those are two different things. It is fundamental to look at the patterns found in the Bible in order to better understand how God does things in order to better understand soteriology and psychology and anthropology, etc. That's part of what Original Oatmeal is all about.

Bingozee, meow meow, can I eat you tomorrow?

Meme Art left a comment agreeing with Eternal Security. He confronted Wells.

Movies vs Books

01:34 AM - Steemit

Different things works for different people. Not everybody is a book person. Also, movies and TV does very well at complimenting life. However, the problem is that it too often replaces life for some people. The best we can do is to make sure we have a life first. Books, by the way, on the other hand, can be part of our lives in some ways that could be different than movies and shows can be. So, books truly are valuable. Interactive things can be.

Fighting the IRS

01:36 AM - Steemit

Does any of this relate to what happened in 1871?

FCC vs HAM

01:47 AM - Steemit | IWA

FCC to shut down sales of popular prepping radio in one month; Here is how to get your before the ban!

Steem Ethics

02:11 AM -Steemit

From a free market perspective, it would be better to just upvote in the same way we buy stuff. I don't downvote. And upvoting is like betting on the horses that may win. The ability to upvote and downvote might be like double betting where you create a win win situation if you are able to bet on both sides in a scheme to always win. Not saying we have that with Steem. I believe in supply and demand.

It would be better if we were focused only on upvoting what we liked as opposed to also, at the same time, trying to police the place in trying to minimize posts that might earn too much money subjectively. Having the freedom to do both is what we have currently it seems. I know some people might like that freedom to do that. But people don't go to McDonald's and steal money from them because they earned too much money, right? Facebook earns billions of dollars each year from us. Can we go and downvote Facebook for making too money? They don't share that money with us. That's sad. But I would not downvote Facebook.

Bid Bots War

12:16 AM - Steemit

I disagree. Part of your argument involves bid bots. But how would you stop a bid bot? And what if a bid bot is doing exactly what a person would have done in upvoting and downvoting? Would you steal money from Facebook or McDonald's for making too much money? We may want to but the free market is about supply and demand. We should focus on making money. We can focus on upvoting what we think will make a lot of money. We could get mad if we lose the upvoting game when we find out that these other posts that we didn't upvote made a lot of money. I believe in trying to make a lot of money. A lot of people can be poor. Some people can become very rich. Some can try to get richer. That's life. It is the struggle, the fight upwards.

Socialism vs Free Markets

02:22 AM - Steemit

Your version of socialism exists in the free market in the form of partnerships, relationships, teamwork, the free market, in working together, in competing, in being humans, in the fundamentals of eternal love and eternal principles. Regardless of how you see socialism, the problem is within federal governments, globalism, authoritarianism, tech cartels, corporatism, monopolism, etc, etc, in what they have been doing, etc.

Centralization vs Decentralzation

02:25 AM - Steemit

I want 10 cars. Don't stop me from doing what I want to do. Private property rights. Otherwise, who decides? It always comes back to centralization or decentralization of powers in regards to who decides what is best for the environment, etc, etc.

Lucifer Debate

10:32 AM - IWA

Lucifer was given freewill and chose a different path.

Money Freedom

12:23 PM - Make Money Great Again

Legally, PERSONS are not PEOPLE, in the USA

02:38 PM - IWA

Goldless by 1971

By the way, it seems that the dollar went off the gold standard in the year of 1971 according to this lady at least. Ironically, 1971 was a century after 1871. Now, I wonder, did something happen in 1771 as well? Not sure.

The United States is a Corporation

I should probably write an article about this. In this article, it talks about how our country, the USA, became a corporation that is owned by the British Crown. It goes on to talk about how the American flag (click here to see another article about our flag) in courtrooms features a gold fringe which indicates the jurisdiction of commercial law, AKA British Maritime Law. We may see similar things in Roman, Babylon, and Sumerian law, thanks to people like the Illuminati, etc. Like I said, I need to do more research on these things.

1776 vs U.S. CORPS

I was going down a rabbit trail while researching the act of 1871 which added a corporation called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in all caps which is owned by the BRITISH CROWN which is not to be confused with the country in lowercase letter, the United States, I ran across a thing about a distinction made between PERSONS and HUMAN BEINGS (I'm not talking about Bingozee) and I wanted to share some of that here:

Offices vs Persons:

According to this one article:

Because these "offices" are not persons, the state will not, and cannot prosecute them, therefore they enjoy almost complete protection by the state in the performance of their daily duties. This is why it is impossible to sue or file charges against most government employees. If their crimes should rise to the level where they "shock the community" and cause alarm in the people, then they will be terminated from state employment and lose their absolute protection. If you carefully pay attention to the news, you will notice that these government employees are always terminated from their office or state employment and then are they arrested, now as a common person, and charged for their crimes. Simply put, the state will not eat its own.

Person = Legal Slavery

What they do not say is, that holding any state office binds free men into slavery for the state. They are ever ready to trick you into accepting the state office of "person," and once you are filling that office, you cease to be free men. You become regulated creatures, called persons, totally created by the legislature. You will hear "free men" mentioned all the time, but you will never hear about "free persons."

Police Pulls You Over

When you are pulled over by the police, roll down your window and say, "You are speaking to a Sovereign political power holder. I do not consent to you detaining me. Why are you detaining me against my will ?" Now the state office of policeman knows that "IT" is talking to a flesh and blood Sovereign. The police officer cannot cite a Sovereign because the state legislature can only regulate what they create. And the state does not create Sovereign political power holders. It is very important to lay the proper foundation, Right from the beginning. Let the police officer know that you are a Sovereign. Remain in your proper office of Sovereign political power holder. Do not leave it. Do not be persuaded by police pressure or tricks to put on the mask of a state "person."

Sovereign vs Person

Here is the often expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court, that "in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 667 (1979) (quoting United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U.S. 600, 604 (1941)). See also United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 275 (1947).

Sovereign Exemption

"A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends." Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907).

State vs People

Let a state be considered as subordinate to the people: But let everything else be subordinate to the state. The latter part of this position is equally necessary with the former.

How-to Give up Sovereignty

There are many ways you can give up your Sovereign power and accept the role of "person." One is by receiving state benefits. Another is by asking permission in the form of a license or permit from the state. Good thing state IDs expired every six years, right?

Right to Remain Silent

One of the subtlest ways of accepting the role of "person," is to answer the questions of bureaucrats. When a state bureaucrat knocks on your door and wants to know why your children aren't registered in school, or a police officer pulls you over and starts asking questions, you immediately fill the office of "person" if you start answering their questions. It is for this reason that you should ignore or refuse to "answer" their questions and instead act like a true Sovereign, a King or Queen, and ask only your own questions of them. You are not a "person" subject to their laws.

People vs Judges

The judge knows that as long as he remains in his office, he is backed by the awesome power of the state, its lawyers, police and prisons. The judge will try to force you to abandon your Sovereign sanctuary by threatening you with jail. No matter what happens, if you remain faithful to your Sovereignty, The judge and the state may not lawfully move against you. The state did not create the office of Sovereign political power holder. Therefore, they do not regulate and control those in the office of Sovereign. They cannot ascribe penalties for breach of that particular office. The reason they have no authority over the office of the Sovereign is because they did not create it and the Sovereign people did not delegate to them any such power.

Illegal Aliens

I wonder if undocumented immigrants are sovereign or not, assuming that any of this is true. I would say that either some or all of this is true. It seems that groups have been infiltrating the United States for too many decades or centuries. It seems that lawyers are helping alleged refuges make it into America. It seems that if a refugee is without a state ID, that refugee may not be a legal person who would be subject to the state. Legally speaking, it seems that globalists are flooding America with MAYBE SOVEREIGNS (Illegal Aliens) while enslaving we the people by making sure we remain as LEGAL AND ENSLAVED OR EMPLOYED PERSONS.

Standing on Rights

"The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).

Common Law

Notice this: "His power to contract is unlimited." As a Sovereign individual, your power to contract is unlimited. In common law there are certain criteria that determine the validity of contracts. They are not important here, except that any contract that would harm others or violate their Rights would be invalid. For example, a "contract" to kill someone is not a valid contract. Apart from this obvious qualification, your power to contract is unlimited.... Finally, the Supreme Court says, "He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." The Sovereign individual does not have to pay taxes.

Jail

A few weeks in jail can put pressure on people to be PERSONS. I was in jail and I saw this first hand.... The Supreme Court has cited Hale v. Henkel a total of 144 times..... If the judge is stupid enough to actually follow through with his threats and send you to jail, you will soon be released without even being arraigned and all charges will be dropped. You will then have documented prima facie grounds for false arrest and false imprisonment charges against him personally.... Now that you know the hidden evil in the word "person", Try to stop using it in everyday conversation. Simply use the correct term, MAN or WOMAN. Train yourself, your family and your friends to never use the derogatory word "person" ever again.

Wikipedia has a conspiracy theory on this stating that the sovereign citizen movement began in the 1970's by tax protestors and others.

Driving

Technically, you might be required to be a LEGAL PERSON in order to drive on public roads. Legally, I don't know if they allow sovereign men and women drive or not. It really comes down to what the laws and everything says. So, I would like to do more research on that.

What happened to our country?

If a corporation was created that uses the name of our country, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, then where is the United States? I should really investigate this more. Is the actually country in lowercase letters still around or totally gone or partly gone, assuming that a corporation was birth in 1871, is the question.

Rough Draft

This is just a rough draft note concerning the U.S. CORPS and the thing about PERSONS and TAXES and DRIVING and PRISONS, etc, etc. I will try to write more on these things in the future.

Expiring Persons

For example, assuming all of this is true, if I was a LEGAL PERSON of the U.S. CORPS, would my LEGAL STATUS as a LEGAL PERSON expire when my state ID expires, for example? How would I become a LEGAL PERSON of the corporation? Will my status as a person expire if I destroy my birth certificate and/or documents, etc, etc, I wonder.

Becoming Persons

Do I become a person when I join Facebook, a bank account, an employment, a school, etc? Also, will my position, my title, my office, of being a PERSON ever expire at any time either at will by my own consent to give up my title as PERSON or does it expire at the end of a term or a certain number of years? These are the questions I have. Some of the answers to my questions might be found in the United States Codes I'm hoping.

Citizens Box

There are so many laws, codes, regulations, penalties, acts, rules, red tape, etc, and they may have rules against sovereign citizens or NON-PERSONS who have not pledged themselves as servants of the state. I do not know if this is true but it is possible that they put in codes to go after people who refuse to be PERSONS. It is possible that they may not let humans drive cars on public roads. If you own the road, of course you can drive on it. But it comes down to whether or not people own public roads. Well, it is possible that the U.S. CORPS owns public roads and that they will send their body guards, AKA police, to go after NON-PERSONS who may drive on those corporately owned roads. Not sure if that is true or not.

Depends on the Codes

Long story short, it depends on the laws, codes, etc. So, I should research more on these things as it can be very complex.

The U.S. CORPS

It seems that, in 1871, that a corporation, using the name of our country but in all-caps, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, was created. That is to be confused with the name of our nation, the United States. But what happened to our actual nation, then? Is this U.S. CORPS owned by England? I have so many questions. I need to do more research on some of these things.

I wrote a little bit about that here.

Goldless by 1971

By the way, it seems that the dollar went off the gold standard in the year of 1971 according to this lady at least. Ironically, 1971 was a century after 1871. Now, I wonder, did something happen in 1771 as well? Not sure.

Person vs Human Being

Legally, The word "person" includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations. IT DOES NOT SAY MAN OR WOMAN. Notice that only "persons" can commit these state legislature created crimes. A crime is by definition an offense committed against the "state." If you commit an offense against a human, it is called a tort. Examples of torts would be any personal injury, slander, or defamation of character.

The U.S. CORPS

03:44 PM - Steemit

It seems that, in 1871, that a corporation, using the name of our country but in all-caps, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, was created. That is NOT to be confused with the name of our nation, the United States. But what happened to our actual nation, then? Is this U.S. CORPS owned by England? I have so many questions. I need to do more research on some of these things.

I wrote a little bit about that here.

Goldless by 1971

By the way, it seems that the dollar went off the gold standard in the year of 1971 according to this lady at least. Ironically, 1971 was a century after 1871. Now, I wonder, did something happen in 1771 as well? Not sure.

Person vs Human Being

Legally, The word "person" includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations. IT DOES NOT SAY MAN OR WOMAN. Notice that only "persons" can commit these state legislature created crimes. A crime is by definition an offense committed against the "state." If you commit an offense against a human, it is called a tort. Examples of torts would be any personal injury, slander, or defamation of character.

Act of 1871

Here is an article on 1871. The Act of 1871 changed the name of our country and/or added a name for a new corporation.

Pictures of the U.S. Constitution

United States of America

The United States is a Corporation

I should probably write an article about this. In this article, it talks about how our country, the USA, became a corporation that is owned by the British Crown. It goes on to talk about how the American flag (click here to see another article about our flag) in courtrooms features a gold fringe which indicates the jurisdiction of commercial law, AKA British Maritime Law. We may see similar things in Roman, Babylon, and Sumerian law, thanks to people like the Illuminati, etc. Like I said, I need to do more research on these things.

State Citizens

While reading that one article, I saw that it mentioned, historically, how there was no such thing as citizens of the USA but rather citizens of individual states. I don't know anything about that, but that may be true.

United States Code (U.S.C.)

The Code of Laws of the United States of America | Official Website of U.S. code

Where is Our Country?

I remain skeptical and yet open-minded in life. So, what happened to our country? Are we totally owned by a U.S. CORPORATION that hides behind a name that appears to be the name of our country? Did our actual country, the United States, go away completely or partly? I need to do more research to find out more.

Core Values

04:18 PM - Steemit

The United States is founded on core values that the people, NOT THE PERSONS, agree upon. So, I want people that agree with those eternal principles to come into our country.

Transition

It might be argued that we simply need to transition to Open Borders. To some extent, many people are like babies. So, they need to learn how to walk on their own, independently, physically, socially, financially, and provide their own security, safety, to protect themselves without the need for police.

Prostitution

Opening up the borders is like easy love. It like having relationships with everybody. It's like having an open relationship. Imagine a woman or a man who has sex with every human he or she runs into. You might call a human like that to be a whore.

Defining Love

Tucker Carlson likes to put it this way. Imagine inviting ten guests over for dinner. That's awesome. Now imagine ten random folks showing up. And then imagine that they refuse to leave. And then imagine that they start stabbing you with a knife. The difference is that the latter lacks that choice. That is fundamental to the meaning of life, to freewill. That is what love is about. Too often, when we claim we are loving people by helping them, we are in fact spoiling them.

Creature From Jekyll Island

04:20 PM - Steemit

Yes, good idea. How do we stop the Not-Federal Federal Reserve?

Going Off-Grid

04:23 PM - Can we buy more solar power batteries, panels, etc, etc, and make some and distribute power creation devices, etc, etc?

1871

Bitcoin

04:29 PM - Same thing in the crypto market, when Bitcoin up to a high, like 10K USD, or maybe 20K, then many people sold their Bitcoin, perhaps, right? But then again, if you sell your Bitcoin, then somebody else will have that Bitcoin, right? So, why would the value decline in Bitcoin?

Too Quick to Judge

04:40 PM - Beautiful Deaf Girl - Drawing - Man

Perspective Finding

04:55 PM - Exactly. It is easy to forget who you are. Sometimes, you have to stop and smile. You have to get back to eternal principles.

Mother

04:56 PM - I love music too. You must be a great mother. Babies are cute. welcome.

Apple Video Game Console

04:59 PM - Had no idea Apple had this Pippin, not to be confused with Pippin Long Stocking and Scottie Pippen who played with Michael Jordan.

The Nintendo 64 was launching in 1996. I remember the commercials. So many people were looking forward to getting an N64 console for about $200 at a Fred Meyers near you for Christmas. So, we got one. So, that might have been another reason people didn't know about Apple as we were all in loved with the newest Nintendo console. Nintendo was like the Michael Jordan of game consoles in the 1980's. Over time, it could be argued that Sony and Xbox has been possibly doing better than Nintendo since after the 80's in some ways perhaps. I grew up with Nintendo and I generally prefer Nintendo. So, I'm very bias haha.

Parent Trump

05:23 PM - IWA

Supporting Trump is like supporting your parents. But if your parents were murdering or robbing a bank, what would you do? But they are your parents.

Free Flu Shots

07:04 PM - If it helps me keep my salvation, then why not, would be the thought.

Minimalism

08:14 PM - I'm not a minimalist either. But regardless, we do have something in common with minimalists: we don't want to be wasteful. It's valuable to be productive and responsible with what we have, regardless of how much or how little.

Red Letter Media

08:14 PM - Short Treks - re:View - t's more Star Trak discussion! This time, Mike and Rich talk about the current state of Star Trek: Discovery going into season 2, as well as the worthless short films that have been released to keep everyone...interseted? Excited?