Advanced Steem Metrics Report for 14th October 2016
NEW: number of follow operations grouped by date. Making invisible visible: daily payouts, active users, new users, top posts, top comments and others.
Overview
This is a version 0.9 of my daily reports designed to be a comprehensive source of Steem metrics.
Changelog
- New network chart with a count of follows(blog subscriptions) made daily by Steem users
Translations
You're free to translate and publish this report in other languages on Steem and keep all rewards. Please notify me and I'll add a link to your post.
How to read
Every chart starts on 1st of June and extends to yesterday. The number on the label attached to the Y axis on the right is the yesterday's value for that chart. Historical charts have STEEM/USD volume weighted daily price(Vwap) on the Y axis on the left of the chart.
User acquisition
| Yesterday | Last 7 day Avg. | Last 30 day Avg. | Max since June 01 | Min since June 01 | |
| Vwap | $0.30 | $0.33 | $0.45 | $4.34 | $0.19 |
| New accounts | 72 | 86 | 135 | 1,752 | 11 |
A basic metric of any startup, user acquisition provides insights into the future trends of Steem platform. Chart is based on number of new accounts grouped by the created date. Only accounts that have performed any of these actions are included: post, comment, vote.
User engagement
| Yesterday | Last 7 day Avg. | Last 30 day Avg. | Max since June 01 | Min since June 01 | |
| Vwap | $0.30 | $0.33 | $0.45 | $4.34 | $0.19 |
| Active voters | 3,634 | 3,936 | 3,710 | 5,421 | 230 |
| Active commenters | 981 | 1,024 | 1,099 | 2,816 | 99 |
| Active authors | 838 | 851 | 874 | 1,789 | 64 |
A number of engaged accounts grouped by distinct activity. At least one action (vote, post or comment) is required.
Network
| Yesterday | Last 7 day Avg. | Last 30 day Avg. | Max since June 01 | Min since June 01 | |
| Vwap | $0.30 | $0.33 | $0.45 | $4.34 | $0.19 |
| Follows | 3,111 | 5,820 | 7,081 | 19,406 | 1 |
Number of follow operations made by Steem accounts grouped by date
Content
| Yesterday | Last 7 day Avg. | Last 30 day Avg. | Max since June 01 | Min since June 01 | |
| Vwap | $0.30 | $0.33 | $0.45 | $4.34 | $0.19 |
| Posts | 1,300 | 1,290 | 1,340 | 4,720 | 95.0 |
| Comments | 5,140 | 5,540 | 6,010 | 15,500 | 282 |
High quality content generation has a well positive feedback loop with traffic acquisition through short term viral promotion and long term SEO benefits. Only posts with >= 2 votes and comments with >= 0 votes are counted.
Payout metrics
| Yesterday | Last 7 day Avg. | Last 30 day Avg. | Max since June 01 | Min since June 01 | |
| Vwap | $0.30 | $0.33 | $0.45 | $4.34 | $0.19 |
| Payout | 11,400 | 12,400 | 19,000 | 220,000 | 7,700 |
Payout data is a sum of pending and past payouts for posts created on the given date.
Daily votes by marine fauna
Number of votes made yesterday by minnows, dolphins and whales by percentiles. Data demonstrates that most Steem users do not deplete their voting power and therefore do not maximize their curation rewards. Note: Voting power depletes completely by voting 200 times during 5 days therefore daily votes metric has some degree of imprecision. If you are interested in increasing your curation rewards, get in touch with me on steemit.chat
Distribution of post payouts for 14th October 2016
This is a breakdown of post payouts per percentile. Only top 25% of post payouts are visible on the chart.
Some examples from the distribution of post payouts
75% of post payouts (not visible on this chart) are less than 3.9 SBD
90% of post payouts are less than 21.2SBD
97% of post payouts are less than 47.7SBD
1% of post payouts are greater than 159.5SBD
Read more about Power law distribution
Top 25 post payout ranking for 14th October 2016
Top 25 Posts by Payout Ranking for 14th October 2016
Top 25 Posts by Net Votes with Rewards Less than 10 SBD for 14th October 2016
Top 15 Posts by Unique Comment Authors Ranking for 14th October 2016
Top 15 Comments by Payout for 14th October 2016
| Payout | Number of votes | First 40 comment symbols | Author |
| 22.946 | 236 | <center>http://i.imgsafe.org/12280849fd. | @steemsports |
| 3.07 | 31 | #Peerplays Project [![Follow Peerplays] | @peerplays |
| 1.013 | 4 | STEEMIT was never going to be an acceler | @stephenkendal |
| 0.641 | 53 | If someone went in as an Electrician, wh | @gikitiki |
| 0.617 | 54 | Fascinating, Charlie. I would probably | @ericvancewalton |
| 0.546 | 121 | <center>http://i.imgsafe.org/124d9eae72. | @steemsports |
| 0.338 | 3 | Looking good! Look forward to more infor | @jesta |
| 0.326 | 1 | Email verification is worthless: it's tr | @recursive |
| 0.271 | 3 | I literally laughed out loud several tim | @stellabelle |
| 0.258 | 4 | thanks for the comment - i agree with yo | @ntomaino |
| 0.248 | 1 | Thank you for posting. It is always a g | @bleujay |
| 0.175 | 1 | @jackkang copy pasting is not allowed bu | @englishtchrivy |
| 0.171 | 2 | Great post, Luke. It got me thinking: | @sean-king |
| 0.135 | 2 | @stellabelle Basically what happened in | @kyriacos |
| 0.132 | 2 | Great pics - you have a new follower - * | @gringalicious |
Disclaimer
The data and visualization in this post may contain errors and inaccuracies. Don't make important decisions without verifying data yourself. If you have any suggestions or found an error in the data, please get in touch with me on steemit.chat.
Another great report.
There's a few steemit users I'll checkout.
Awesome stuff.. Thanks!
Keep up these awesome reports @ontofractal!