Are we being manipulated into a war with Russia?
Introduction - A worrying trend in the media
Although I don't remember the end of the cold war very well (as I was very young) I do rememer some of the terrifying themes of nuclear apocalypse that used to pervade the culture of the late 1980s.
That sort of thing leaves a grave and inedible impression on a young mind and it used to be everywhere at the time.
People really believed that the world could end at any moment due to a nuclear war in the 1980s. - The Cuban Missile Crisis in the 1960s and a number of other "near misses" had illustrated how easily it could happen.
It was only after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 that the world was able to breathe a collective sigh of relief and move beyond that kind of thinking - or so it seemed.
Though I generally try to avoid the mass media these days I still encounter its' influence peripherally and I'm starting to notice a worrying trend.
It seems to me that we are seeing huge amounts of stories that are being engineered to create ill feeling and fear towards Russia. I am no fan of Putin's regime but it seems to me that a lot of what is happening has a very distinctive propagandising theme to it.
Our military and political overlords seem to be engineering a resumption of the cold war.
The Mechanism
Problem + Solution Marketing
Due to the way our minds work we are much more likely to focus on problems and negative issues than on those that are positive.
This leaves us open to the "Problem+Solution" form of marketing. Advertisers have used this for years.
The basic idea is first to create a new problem (Russian Aggression/Hacking) in the mind of the consumer (us) and then sell us the solution (further militarisation).
It is classic marketing strategy and it works.
It is good to recycle
It is even more ingenius to recycle an old problem and make it into a new one.
That way you can reuse a lot of the old material you have and also rekindle past fears that may still exist in people's unconscious minds.
You will see evidence of this in the type of language and imagery that the media will use to describe the situation including "classic" cold war imagery of Soviet Flags and the like being flashed up when discussing Russia.
The narrative - Russia = Bad Guy
Every day we seem to see a new story about Russian Hacks or "Putin said this" or "Putin said that".
You don't need to be a genius to see that a lot of these stories involve a mixture of speculation, innuendo and deliberate misquoting/willful misunderstanding.
You see articles in various publications asking what action will be taken and how this can be tolerated.
Further we have our politicians ratcheting up the rhetoric based on these half truths and speculation. I have inserted some examples of this below:
Some examples of this:
Incompetence + Manipulation = Plausible Deniablity
A more naive younger version of myself may have believed that this was pure incompetence.
Nowadays I believe that incompetence is often combined with actual willful manipulation as a means of shielding it and making it more believable.
It also helps with plausible deniability when you get dragged up in front of parliamentary watchdogs/public oversight bodies.
Why?
Supply and Demand - We are in the war business
The War on Terror seems to be petering out. There is only so long you can scare people with a nameless faceless bogeyman because people develop a tolerance to it. The military industrial complex needs a new "product" to sell us and sustain their growth.
Source: Wikipedia
Keep developing new products and stir up demand
No good business can rest on it's laurels - there must be constant evolution or you will get left behind and lose your market.
Great companies like Apple are always looking to the future. They didn't just develop the Ipod and leave it there. They created the Iphone, then the IPad and then the Apple Watch.
They are always thinking several steps ahead to ensure that they don't become irrelevant and lose market share.
Our militaries and the private corporations that depend on them are no different. They must ensure future demand for their services.
In the arms business too much peace can be very bad for business. It pays to stir up conflict.
Mirroring on the other side - business is business
Note - there may also be interests on the Russian side that favour such a war.
They are actually the second biggest arms dealer after the US.
I suspect there could even be collusion between business interests on both sides to push this agenda. I see both sides as being mirror images of each other and collusion would only make business sense.
Wars Are Good for Popularity
Wars have a tendency to make leaders more popular and can have benefits in terms of uniting the population against a single threat. If we take a look at some of our most well remembered leaders from history it is no coincidence that they are often war-time leaders.
May and Clinton : A win-win situation for the unpopular leaders
In the US it seems Hillary Clinton may well win the election despite not being very popular amongst voters (and even people in her own party).
On this side of the Atlantic we have a new (unelected) Prime Minister in the form of Theresa May.
Things are not going well for the economy here due to Brexit and coincidentally what is one of our biggest exports in the UK? It's actually weapons.
A new war, particularly a long term "cold war" lasting decades, would be a great way to sell more arms and create unity.
It would be excellent for UK/USA PLC (as people in the government sometimes refer to the economy).
It would also help to increase the popularity of these two leaders who are not really very well liked.
I think Theresa May and Hillary would love to emulate the effect the Falklands War had on the image of Margaret Thatcher.
So it makes perfect sense for them to position Russia as our new enemy. The "new bad guy" theme is just too perfect for our leaders to pass up.
A Two For One Deal
They can also package this up with terrorism and make it a "2 for 1 deal" in their marketing.
Get ready to see a gradual pushing of the idea that Russia is involved in international terrorism too. It is only a matter of time. We have seen this used before just prior to the Iraq war with the deliberate fabrication of links to terrorism.
I hope I am being overly cynical but past precedent just makes a lot of this stuff all the more obvious.
How can we fight this sort of thing? Technology = Hope
There is hope that we can overcome this kind of manipulation and I believe that hope comes from the ability of technology to connect people.
During the past Cold War there was no internet. People were isolated and could not easily communicate with each other.
This increases polarisation and misunderstandings between populations making it a lot easier to engage in dehumanisation.
This is the basis of tribalism.
Technology vs Tribalism
Today people in the UK/Europe and US can instantly communicate with those in Russia and any other part of the world. The internet, social networks and platforms like Steemit help us to see how similar we all are.
They also make a mockery of the "us vs them" black and white dualism that our leaders try to capitalise on.
Conclusions
I think you would have to be monumentally ignorant or naive to be blind to the anti-Russian rhetoric and scare-mongering that is going on in the media at the moment.
As long as we don't give in to fear and we continue communicating and building bridges with our fellow humans the impact of these kind of manipulations can be reduced.
We must use our brains and constantly look at the details and facts behind what is being said.
As the old saying goes "The price of liberty is eternal vigilance".
Thank you for Reading. Here is your reward for getting to the End:
If you like my work and aren't already, please follow me and check out my blog (I mainly discuss photography but I do other topics too) - @thecryptofiend
Photo Credits: Screenshots are personally taken by me with credit given where appropriate and all other photos are from my own personal Thinkstock Photography account.
(Verification for me here: http://www.aapicture.com/about-me)
Some of my other recent posts
- How to Use Blocktrades - the Fastest and Easiest Way to Buy and Sell STEEM/SD (and My Review of the Experience)
- A few shots from Grangetown Cemetery - photos for you to use in your Halloween and other posts
- Westgate Hill Cemetery - photos for you to use in your Halloween posts
- Return to the Sage (Concert Venue) in Gateshead - (feel free to use in your own posts)
- The Face 2015 Photography Competition - I received a nice surprise in the post!
Are You New to Steemit and Finding it Confusing?
These resources may help:
- For a Quick FAQ - Try this
- To learn about Markdown (to help you post) - Try this
- Need to know Steemit Etiquette? - Try this
- Need some free images for your posts? Try Steemit4free - make sure to check which images it applies to.
- Need to talk to a human for help? - Try the chat
- Need Mentorship? - Try Steemprentice - here is a link that explains it, and here is the chat channel.
- Need a Free Image Host that works with Steemit? - Try SteemImg - it automatically produces markdown and html links for you, as well creating thumbnails and more.
It is posts like yours that attracted me to Steemit. Aware of mass media bias, but also recognising that the fear mongering alternative news is just as bad, and the answer lies somewhere in the middle, most of the time. I hope!
I think the news these days is basically dramatic content for entertainment purposes only even if it doesn't have specific agenda. To get to the substance you have to do your own research. Glad you are liking and enjoying being on Steemit:)
As always, a freed slave seeks another master, not necessarily better
That would explain why I feel strangely adrift...
If Tramp wins the US elections.... the EU will sanction Russia. If Russia will start talking, we will introduce sanctions. If the US tax rate rises, we will sanction Russia. If pigeons dont stop shitting on monuments, we will sanction Putin personally ...
The above sentence would be funny if it wasn't sad
So true. I'm not fan of Putin or Russian policies but the thing is we are all equally bad in this situation. There are no good guys we are all bad guys. Blaming Russia for everything can help to deflect attention from the real problems we have at home.
Or maybe the public is being manipulated into believing America is being manipulated into a war with Russia?
If the objective is arms sales, actual war is not necessary at all.
And if nuclear weapons are also a total con job, the real aim is to create fear. Real destruction isn't actually necessary.
https://steemit.com/life/@sift666/atomic-bombs-are-a-complete-con-job-they-don-t-even-exist
Like Killary and Chump, the conflict is a con, and they both have the same puppet masters hands up their arses.
It is possible. I would just rather not test it!
This post has been linked to from another place on Steem.
Learn more about and upvote to support linkback bot v0.5. Flag this comment if you don't want the bot to continue posting linkbacks for your posts.
Built by @ontofractal
Thank you:)
Great article. But I'm a bit skeptical about the conclusion. The internet is a double-edged sword. On the one hand it has enabled us to be connected and see things from various perspectives. But on the other hand it has enabled the manipulation of public opinion on a massive scale. I guess the net effect is zero.
I think manipulation does occur on the internet but it does also empower people to find things out for themselves so I don't think net result is zero but who know's for sure? Even a few more people having open minds can make a difference.
Of course they are trying to get us into war... been that way for a century... longer in Europe.
However what it is doing is awakening the people (everywhere) and getting the US citizens to arm themselves and become more self sufficient as we used to be.
We will eventually pull back all troops and concentrate more on our own backyard.
Have hope.
Thanks. I always have hope:)
Just look at the difference:
In Mossul the official government attacks ISIS with the help of a foreign force. Civilians are happy about the incoming forces and promises of fights to be freed! FANTASTIC!!!
In Aleppo the official government attacks ISIS with the help of an allied force. Civilians are covering in bloody earth holes and complaining. BAD BAD BAD!!!!
Guess which one is attacked with help of Russia and which one with help of USA.
And don't forget it was Russia that offered peace in 2012, including the removal of Assad. But the West didn't wanted that. Said the UN official for the peace process.
I have written a German piece about that Putin get attacked a week back.
https://steemit.com/politics/@lennstar/putinversteher-und-putinversteher-nichtversteher
Thanks for your thoughtful answer. Would you consider doing an English version of your post? Please let me know if you do:)
Sorry, not the time before NaNoWriMo starts ;)
It also includes some German-only-understandable content on words. Like the headline ^^
The whole idea of Russian Hackers being responsible for everything is just a cover up of what adds up to an immense amount of governmental incompetence and disregard for basic cyber security principles (not to even mention the basics of handling classified information). The incompetence is what led to the problem in the first place, not the media cesspool of anti-Russia crap.
Your point about business collusion is excellent and needs more investigation. I bet you're really onto something there but it needs to be proven.
I don't think that the terrorism issue can be attributed to Russia because that would require the re-opening of public mentions of terrorism as being carried out by Muslims. It would be very difficult to push that kind of agenda through the media without mentioning Muslims at all and it would be quickly refuted since Moscow had as many attacks as France.
Your conclusion is right on. More dialogue amongst us peasants = less governmental manipulation. Those Cold War 'myths' about 'the other' are a thing of the past hopefully. Reminds me, some years ago this tard asked me, in all seriousness if babies in the Soviet Union were "assigned their future jobs when they are born". I called him a retard and he tried to fight me.
Thanks for your fantastic answer! I agree the terrorist thing is far fetched but they have previous form of trying to fabricate nonsensical links e.g Iraq and Al Qaeda. The could also use the technique of reframing what they define as terrorism - perhaps Russia is supplying arms to a State which they could then link to some activity they don't like. They have already tried that with Syria.
Hilliary and the Dhmikrats are trying to start a war.
I'd have thought that was obvious from what she did in Benghazi and Libya.
Yes these seem to be very pro-war!
I kind of hoped to read your thoughts about Abkazia, the war with Georgia, the annexion of Crimea and the war in Eastern Ukrain, Transnistria, the naval russian base in Tartus... You know... Facts. And not a word. Nice pictures though.
Like I said I am not a fan of what Russia is doing in its militaristic endeavours but it is no different from what we do in the West. We have been invading countries and changing regimes with impunity. It is equally bad. A cold war which could escalate into World War III is not the solution.