in #knowledge2 years ago

Preamble: How old is our civilization? The answer to this question keeps changing over the last 2,000 years and will continue to change as we learn more and more about “our past”. One thing is clear – our “civilization” isn’t the first to have existed on this planet.

Just how many civilizations existed before us? The “oldest” civilization that is widely accepted at this time is the Sumerian which is believed to have existed around 4000 BC. Not everyone agrees though since several other pieces of “history” are not accounted for. The giants mentioned in the bible, the “fluvial” erosion in the body of the Sphinx in Egypt that could not have occurred before 10,000 BC, the Nephilim mentioned in Genesis (6:4) who took earthy women for wives who gave birth to the “giants”, the Anunnakis - believed to have created humans by altering ape’s DNA and ruled over earth for over 400,000 years plus the recent discovery of a 700,000-Year-Old Stone Tools found in the Philippines used to butcher a Rhino.

History as we know it is incomplete and convoluted with mythology. But advances in technology is allowing us to separate history from myths.

Who or what created us and for what purpose? I think this is the ultimate riddle that sentient beings like us should strive to get an answer for. Imagine that you woke up one day with no memory of who you are. Would you not spend the rest of your life finding out who you really are, who your parents were, whether you have a family etc.? In a way, this is what happened to us. We forgot. Or maybe something tricked us to forget our true nature and our rightful place in the universe.

It is clear that "higher knowledge" has been deliberately hidden from us for thousands of years. Therefore, you and me are beholden to uncover and bring this information out to enlighten the world. To end the battle between knowledge and ignorance. To free us from the obstruction caused by established dogmas and lies; for this knowledge could lead us to a greater understanding of our universe and of ourselves.

You've probably never heard of the Dacian civilization before. If so, I don't blame you. The suppressed knowledge about the Dacian civilization is one of the misgivings of our history. A history that needs re-writing.

Here's a brief background about the Dacian civilization:

Roman Dacia was a province of the Roman Empire from 106 to 275 AD. Its territory consisted of eastern and south-eastern Transylvania, the Banat and Oltenia.

The Dacian Wars (101–102, 105–106) were two military campaigns fought between the Roman Empire and Dacia during Roman Emperor Trajan's rule. The conflicts were triggered by the constant Dacian threat on the Danubian Roman Province of Moesia and also by the increasing need for resources of the economy of the Roman Empire.

Trajan turned his attention to Dacia, an area north of Macedon and Greece and east of the Danube that had been on the Roman agenda since before the days of Caesar when they defeated a Roman army at the Battle of Histria. In AD 85, the Dacians swarmed over the Danube and pillaged Moesia and initially defeated the army that Emperor Domitian sent against them. The Romans were defeated in the Battle of Tapae in 88 and a truce was established.

Emperor Trajan recommenced hostilities against Dacia and, following an uncertain number of battles, defeated the Dacian King Decebalus in the Second Battle of Tapae in 101 AD. With Trajan's troops pressing towards the Dacian capital Sarmizegetusa Regia, Decebalus once more sought terms. Decebalus rebuilt his power over the following years and attacked Roman garrisons again in 105. In response, Trajan again marched into Dacia, besieging the Dacian capital in the Siege of Sarmizegetusa, and razing it. With Dacia quelled, Trajan subsequently invaded the Parthian empire to the east, his conquests expanding the Roman Empire to its greatest extent. Rome's borders in the east were indirectly governed through a system of client states for some time, leading to less direct campaigning than in the west in this period. Source

Who Were the Dacians?

There is very little known about the Dacian race. Where they came from and how they possessed such high level of knowledge. The oral traditions of the locals tells of stories that they simply appeared out of nowhere.

The ancient Thraces civilization occupied Romania and Germany and stretches out to the Caspean sea. The Greeks referred to them as the Getae and the Romans as Daci.

The books of Herodotus and Plato offers phrases to the Dacians. The Dacians were allied to the Greeks during the siege of Troy and to Alexander the Great during his conquests.

Their artistry shows the level of accomplishment they have achieved which made the Greeks primitive in comparison.

Dacian Culture found in Greeks & Romans

We know that the Romans borrowed much of the Greeks culture, arts and even religion. And somehow, the Greeks just developed and invented their wealth of knowledge from scratch. But know, there are mounting evidence that the Greeks borrowed most of their knowledge from mathematics, geometry, architecture, religion just to name a few. The Greek gods for example, may have been borrowed from the Dacians:

Dacian emblem was the wolf – a symbol for liberty and insubordination.

The story of the Capitoline wolf mother and her two cubs were an endelic part of the Dacian race. Did the Romans adopted the story from the Dacians?

In Roman mythology, Romulus and Remus are twin brothers, whose story tells the events that led to the founding of the city of Rome and the Roman Kingdom by Romulus. The killing of Remus by his brother, and other tales from their story, have inspired artists throughout the ages. Since ancient times, the image of the twins being suckled by a she-wolf has been a symbol of the city of Rome and the Roman people. Although the tale takes place before the founding of Rome around 750 BC, the earliest known written account of the myth is from the late 3rd century BC. Possible historical basis for the story, as well as whether the twins' myth was an original part of Roman myth or a later development, is a subject of ongoing debate. Source

Is this a symbolic representation that the Dacians heavily influenced the Roman empire?

The Dacian Draco was the standard ensign of troops of the ancient Dacian people. The Dacians bearing the draco on Trajan's Column

Why suppress the knowledge about the Dacian Culture?

Throughout our known history, there is one prominent organization that suppressed ancient knowledge and destroyed, discredited and hid evidence of such knowledge - the religious organization.

But why?

The Romans may offer a clue.

Despite being victorious against the Dacians, the Roman Emperor Trajan erected monuments to honor these fierce warriors. For what purpose, we don't know. Some historians believe it was in recognition of the Dacian's might and prowess in battle. Other's say its to immortalize the superiority of the Roman army against a mighty enemy.

The one big question is why the statues erected for the Dacian warriors we up to 3 meters tall or about 9.5 feet tall? One theory is that the unusual height is that emperor Trajan admired the strength and courage of this fallen enemy.

However, if that is true, then why would other equally great Roman warriors not depicted in a similar way? This led to another theory that these statues are life size!

What other evidence supports the theory that the Dacians were up to 12 feet tall?

One less verifiable claim is the oral tradition telling of the towering might of Dacian warriors. The natural museum in Bucharest could however, hold a more convincing evidence. Several artifacts including jewelries were unearthed in the Dacian capital.

One these artifacts is the breastplate. It is 31.5 inches, almost twice the size of an ordinary man.

The average man in the United States is 5-foot 10-inches tal, and weighs 172 pounds. His shoulder width is 18-1/4 inches. Using that as a starting number, if your shoulder width is approximately 18-1/4 inches . . . then, your shoulder width is AVERAGE or NORMAL.

Another artifact is the golden bracelet. The dimension of this bracelet is just too big for an average man.

And a ring with a diameter of a little more than an inch.

In the same way that this golden crown and helmet. Both are too big for an ordinary head. The crown came from King Suits 3rd, excavated from this Tomb in Bulgaria.

More Evidence of the Giants Race

An episode in the Thracian history tells of a story of a Shepperd boy who became King. His name was Maximinus Thrax. He measured about 8 ft 3 inches. In 190 BCE, in Bulgaria, Roman soldiers encountered the Thracian shepherd who towered over them by several heads. He later joined the Roman army, and rose through the ranks and became emperor in 235 AD.

This Sinai tablet unearthed in a small Romanian village of the same name describes the scene where men came face to face with giants.

Argedava is believed to be the place where the Tracians retreated, regathered and made their last stand against the Romans.

Residents of this place have an oral tradition that giants used to live here. In fact, one of the residents accidentally excavated a skeleton of huge size. He confided in a national newspaper company that he participated in an excavation where skeletons of gigantic proportions were found. He reported the discovery of 80 sketelons unearth between 1946 and 1954.

Argedava had once of the most important citadel of the Dacians.

The trenches created by the excavations is now covered by thorny bushes. The artists who participated in the dig claims that military personnel came with trucks and hauled all the skeletons, never to be seen again.

Oral folklore also talks of giants who existed in the mountains of Ceahlau. Every year, a feast is celebrated on the morning of August 6. The devotees witness the perfect pyramid shadow created by the 2 mountains – Panaghia and Toaca – the pyramid of Ceahlau.

Legend has it that somewhere, the shadow points to the entrance of an unimaginable wealth of the giants.

Petrified Remains of a Giant?

In this small village of Corbii de Piatra, lies a monastery dug out of the giant rock and dates back to 1512 AD.

Not far from the Monastery is a sedimentary rock believes to hold the petrified body of a giant:

The legend goes that this giant fell on this face when the flood consumed the area.

Close to the village of Scaeni, bones of giants were discovered in 1965. Somewhere between Scaeni and Boziuro, the farmers while digging holes to plant apple trees, stumbled upon several giant bones about 13 ft in height. A media reporter who visited this village to gather more information about the dig, left empty-handed. Residents were afraid to talk about it for fear of serious consequences perhaps from the Orthodox Church.

Additional Sources:
Source 1; Source 2; Source 3; Note, above images, unless noted were from The Other Land of the Gods documentary.

Related posts:
Part 1: The SPHINX
Part 2: The GARDEN of EDEN Wasn't a PARADISE
Part 4: ADAMITE vs PRE-ADAMITE Bloodline
Part 5: The FLOOD Story
Part 7: GIANTS Who WALKED on EARTH Part 1
Part 8: GIANTS Who WALKED on EARTH Part 2
Part 9: The MAN BAG
Part 10: ATLANTIS The Beginning
Part 11: ANTARCTICA The TRUE Cradle of Civilization?
Part 12: The DOGON Tribe
Part 13: The CREATION Story of the DOGON Tribe


Regarding this topic, like many other topics, there are more questions than answers. "There were giants in the earth in those days". Genesis 6:4. (Public Domain)

Sorry I missed the other posts, will have to look them up. This and related subjects fascinate me as there is a concerted effort by the ptb to hide our history. The giants is one of the most suppressed, with governments around the world carting away the remains. This was not so in the 1800's and supposedly even Lincoln believed in them. I believe this is because the giants were the Nephilim, which were human / alien hybrids. And that is forbidden too by the ptb because that hits close to home for them, too close.

Various religious organizations are suppressing this knowledge for multiple reasons - a topic that is very "sticky". Despite the multiple archeological evidence about the ancient giants, not a single museum in the world displays such artifacts. I hope that will change soon but this change needs to be curated by the masses and not the elite nor the governments.

I agree, but there is also another reason. The giants were descendants of the Nefilum, what the Bible calls the Sons of Anak (Star Wars says Luke Skywalker's father was ANAKIM Skywalker -- Hollywood knows this game if you don't). And the Nfilum were the product of a marriage between the Annunaki "gods" and humans, producing these giants. That's what they are trying to hide. They are also trying to hide the fact that they still rule over us. This is what this "blue blood" shit is all about. It's also why they don't marry "commoners" unless they have to to replenish their gene pool. Humans are and have been slaves to these monsters for thousands of years, except today it is covert not overt. They also aren't giants today but it's the same "people." That is what they are so desperate to hide, because if humanity found out, they might do something about it, and then they couldn't engage in their human sacrifices and blood drinking which is also an ancient ritual. Another fact is that many of these giants actually ate humans. There are apparently some giants left in the Solomon Islands, most of whom no longer eat people. So these facts are what they don't want us to discover.

@sandalphon You have earned a random upvote from @botreporter because this post did not use any bidbots.

appreciate the random upvote @botreporter.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.03
JST 0.026
BTC 12764.63
ETH 394.51
USDT 1.00
SBD 1.01