Hi all. I want money.
Hi steemians!
I am a new user / man with free time / someone who's looking for some extra buck.
I will not go around it.
I didn't register because I want to write something of value. I registered because I want to earn some money.
I still don't know how though...
All I see here is a bunch of minnows writing tons of stuff, that gets forgotten almost immediately.
That sucks.
I also see some whales who automatically get huge upvotes 5 minutes after they post, because of the curration system.
If you don't know about it, the curration system means that one can get money for being the first person to upvote a post at 100% if that post wins money.
That means that people are making bots that autoupvote people based on their reputation.
It is also strange how SP is really hard to cash out, and yet people want it so much...
I don't know.
I prefer SBD, I guess.
After all - I might be gone from SteemIt tomorrow.
Anyway.
Good evening to you all.
It is evening in my side of the world.
Welcome to steemit, happy to have you here
I comment to your post to follow me. and I will follow you
I am@istiaq69 , my real name istiaq ahmed:)
Checkout my blog posts, Enjoy your time here and let's get this party started :)
Hello @extras. Welcome to Steemit. I am David. I wish you have a happy journey here.
Welcome to Steemit @extras :)
Make sure to participate in this weeks giveaway to get known in the community!
Here are some helpful tips to get you started:
@reggaemuffin, the creator of this bot is a witness. See what a witness is and consider voting for the ones you feel are good for steem.
Welcome to Steemit @Extras :) Glad to see more people like you - here joining Steemit! Nice post, i will follow your account, please follow me !
Hi there @Extras ,
Welcome to Steemit ! I am @minnowhelp, nice to meet you !
I do check the values of some offers here and hope so to help new steemians. I just started this project !
In my session 1 of testing the value of an @booster upvote I tracked the gains of different users by using this offer - so - for example @gktown got for an investment of $1.96 and Post Upvote worth $5.09 !
if you want to save money, follow me on follow me on my blog! :)
Extras - welcome to steemit. Hope you will enjoy ! All the best @digital-gypsy
Welcome bots. How nice! Not.
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥ ( ˘ ³˘)♥
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test jdjdjdjdktest Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test test test
Test test test test Test test test test Test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test test Test test test test Test test test test Test test testzhsjdhgd
Welcome to Steemit @extras!
I'm a bot-helper, and I'm created to help. Congratulations on the registration on Steem - you really like it here! If you like me, make an upvote of my comment and follow me. Your upvote will allow you to give more money to new users, such as you. Let's make Steem better together!
I follow you, and to get more upvote and resteem - follow me!
All the money I earn will be donated to charity.
Steem on!
Hello to Ladies and Gentlemen.
And You @extras Welcome to the path of success.
Let Also Introduce Myself.
My name is @joelsteem From Aceh, Indonesia.
I'm Also New At #eSteem and #STEEMIT.
I Choose Mr. @good-karma As #witnees.
You Must Also Choose It As Our Witnees.
Follow My Account @joelsteem
Welcome to Steemit @extras! :c)
I appreciate your honesty. I'd be lying if I said that it wasn't curiosity about the monetary aspect of this platform that got me curious.
However I have learnt that this is not going to be something that is assured to succeed - especially not overnight. As with other money-making processes there is work involved. Posting, commenting, voting.
And the first step is building your personal brand. Posting a masterwork post isn't going to net you much if you have few followers who genuinely wish to follow you. That takes time, thought - and action.
Since you're new here, a quick read through this post may prove helpful.
Your post is the only one not written by a bot so far.
I know what you mean... but I don't believe it will work.
Trying to be more interesting than thousands of people, without quitting my job is not possible.
So far it seems more profitable to write a bot that handles lottery, or some other shit like that.
I am currently researching the javascript library for steem.
It seems to work well.
Ah well there is some privilege in being an unofficial human envoy for Steemit. ^_^
The 'introduce' tags tend to be heavily patrolled by scripted bots, and yes some are less useful than others. You make a very fair point.
If scripting is your talent then it may very well be the case that using it will give you more mileage. :c) I would recommend checking in with far more experienced users than myself for feedback.
My only feedback on the matter is that bots that offer a valid service are less likely to be frowned upon than others that are soley intended to badger 'introductions' :c)
You have power. With power comes responsibility. And exercising them results in earned rights. ^_^
One more thing. I don't believe that Steem has future.
I will try to take as much as I can from it, while it exists.
Just think about it.
This is a fully automatable 'social' platform, that gives money.
Three things are bound to happen:
(as for the 1 account per user defense - it is naive)
On this matter I also do not feel fully qualified to contradict you but I will point out that it will require a very intelligent script to pass itself off as human in words and behaviour.
I also have faith that Steemit wil evolve to incorporate the improvements necessary to make a drastic increase in information flow perfectly managable.
It'll be interesting to see how things develop over time - and I hope that your prediction proves pessimistic. :c) I am warming up to the patform.