Blockchain Bachelor’s Thesis – Information Overload and Methods of its Elimination in the Modern Information Society: Information Overload as an Issue - Brain

in #education6 years ago (edited)


Previously published


Introduction

Blockchainized Bachelor’s Thesis

Blockchainized Bachelor’s Thesis – Initial Brainstorm

Thesis


1.Abstract

2.Preface

3.Introduction

4.Definitions of terms and premises

4.1.Information

4.2.Information explosion

4.3.Information age

4.4. Information society

4.5. Information literacy

5.Information overload as an issue

5.1.1.Thought

5.1.2.Brain

Sources walkthrough


1.Battling Information Overload in the Information Age

2.1.The knowledge-attention-gap: Do we underestimate the problem of information overload in knowledge management? pt.1

2.2.The knowledge-attention-gap: Do we underestimate the problem of information overload in knowledge management? pt. 2

3.Database Research faces the Information Explosion

4.The experience of mobile information overload: struggling between needs and constraints

5.Longer online reviews are not necessarily better

6.An ant-colony based approach for real-time implicit collaborative information seeking

7.A psychological framework to enable effective cognitive processing in the design of emergency management information systems

Case study: Interview


1.First draft

5.1.2. Brain


From the point of view of system theory, we can understand human being as an information communication system in which the brain takes the central position. It has similar capabilities to any man-made information system: it collects, processes, stores and disseminates information [6]. On the basis of the term information that I already defined, it could be deduced that the human brain must receive billions of information bits per second thanks to its "exposure" to objective reality. If all this information really had to be processed knowingly, the brain would be overwhelmed by that information almost as soon as it begins to perceive it. It would have to have enormous amount of information about a very small part of the adjacent objective reality, therefore it would be much more difficult for us to survive. It is therefore highly probable that the defensive mechanism that the human body possesses is the result of some "smart planning" (or rather adapting) of genetic information. The defensive mechanism are our senses. Experts agree that this huge amount is unconsciously registered by the human body, and after reduction, at around 100 bits per second get to our consciousness through the defence barrier of our senses. The human brain, however, literally needs information to survive. It is likely, that we have a tendency to receive information and that even deprivation may occur when the information is not available to us. For the same reason, we also tend to look for and receive mostly new information or the information that can convince us that it is new for our endocept [6].

 

I will try to briefly summarize relevant scientific knowledge of current neurophysiology. As we all know very well, our understanding of human brain isn’t anything extraordinary as of yet. If we were to understand the brain more thoroughly, we could examine the issue more deeply. This is not the case, and therefore the issue must be examined rather empirically. We are currently aware the fact that neuronal interconnections are not solid, but closely tight instead. They are formed by special protrusions of neurons, called dendrites and axons. Their connection is called the synapse. Synapses may arise but they can also wear off. Connections between them are not hierarchical. An example of this is movement control. Neocortex neurons are linked to both the brain stem, where motor reflexes are born, and, in the same way, bypassing the brain stem, directly connected with the spine, when immediate action is needed without a lengthy evaluation. Basic neural processes take place in neurons and in-between neurons. Those lead into higher neural processes, including thinking for instance. Each neuron exhibits bioelectric activity. Its voltage is about 75 millivolts and in neutral state it has a negative voltage. Excitement of individual neurons or entire modules (or transmission of information if you wish) leads to a change in its electrical charge from 75 negative millivolts to 55 positive millivolts. Another crucial piece of information is that highest energy demand occurs when the neurons are being excited or when they return to a state of rest after they were excited. The resulting product of this process is knowledge. The active state is energetically passive [6] [9].

 

The brain in its development, like everything else in the human body, has been subjected to natural development. It is important to realize that natural development does not produce the resulting product from scratch according to the body’s needs (environment and other influences), but must always work with what is already in the body, and alter that through mutation or changes in genetic information. Unlike games, for instance, natural rules are not constant in objective reality, but are very variable in time. The current "information state" after the information explosion is something that biology couldn’t have possibly predicted, for evolution cannot be prepared for future influencers before they appear.[9]

 

It therefore follows that the human body is pre-determined to assess as quickly as possible the relevance of the enormous amount of information to which it is subjected. This is mainly due to the decentralized functioning of the neural network, where the information comes to the brain through different paths from different places (for example, first comes a visual perception, followed by audio and eventually an olfactory component), which allows us to make decisions more efficiently and quickly before the all the relevant information reaches the brain. Unfortunately, Moor's law does not apply to the human brain, and natural selection has to be tested with the ever more complex "information territory" [9]. We can only guess how many information bits are there in the perceived objective reality, how many of them are dropped straight away and how many get into our unconscious and are evaluated. However, from the point of view of information overload, information that is filtered is not relevant, but only information that our body must actively process is. That tiny fraction of the information that gets into our consciousness activates our neurons and the connections between them. Energy-intensive is the initiation phase (start of thinking) and the processing phase. In other words, the "in one ear and out the other" method almost does not use any energy, but we do not know what the information was about after few seconds. If we are actively and critically evaluating the sequence of information, we think about it (we form some sort of “walked through” passages of our neurons and their synapses, thus strengthening them) and after the evaluation of the previous batch of information is completed we start with new one, we "spend" a lot of energy, and in time we will sustain information overload. The brain (or rather the individual neurons and their paths) functions as muscles in the body. If it is used and trained, it improves its performance, if it is not, it tends to degrade.

Sources


6.CEJPEK, Jiří. Informace, komunikace, myšlení: Úvod do informační vědy. 1. vyd. Praha : Karolinum, 1998. 179 s. ISBN 80-7184-767- 4.

10.FULLER, Jack. What Is Happening to News: The Information Explosion and the Crisis in Journalism. Reprint edition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0226005027.

Posted from my blog with SteemPress : http://localhost/wordpress/2018/11/18/blockchain-bachelors-thesis-information-overload-and-methods-of-its-elimination-in-the-modern-information-society-information-overload-as-an-issue-brain/

Sort:  

thx for sharing and thx @chappertron for resteem.

is information realy comming into our system or is it genereted by our system? I think often signal transduction and information-transport are used synonymously. And after your way of modelling it, can knowledge be shared?

PS. I read the definitions and your ontology

Good questions!

Well depends on what you mean by coming into our system. When talking about information that forms objective reality around us (is not initially in our body) then it definitely does NOT come into our system "physically" - we only perceive it and, internally, we create a representation of such an information (that is most probably not the same as the original was). That’s why I said in the definition of information that "information is not consumed in the process, even if it is used by more people at a time." I thought that this would imply that the information itself doesn’t enter the body, cuz otherwise at that moment others wouldn’t be able to perceive it correct?

Knowledge can definitely be shared. The thing is it never is transmitted without any "information loss" for humans lack a channel that wouldn’t be affected by "information noise". We would need a tool that would enable us to fully comprehend how the other persons understands any given thing, all the emotions that are connected to it, all the past experience that influenced him etc. (as described in novel City...awesome book btw give it a read...its short too:P)

"I thought that this would imply that the information itself doesn’t enter the body, cuz otherwise at that moment others wouldn’t be able to perceive it correct?"

Yap same thought here. Cointoss=1bit but 6 observer... so we all must share the same bit. So called mutual information. But this does not describe how (informationtheoreticaly) knowlege about the external event is generated.

Mutarana and Varela for exsample came to conclusion, that we are structural couppled but no knowledge is transfered, so that there is no objektive/ inter-subjektiv knowlege --> only de-novo generation of subjective knowlegde, depending on your sense-making mechanism.

Simak is realy strong science inspired fiction. But I havent read City, sounds great. Thank you for your reply!

But this does not describe how (information theoreticaly) knowlege about the external event is generated.

It doesn’t even try to do that. As far as my recherché went, we don’t have data about that matter - we don’t know. We only perceive with our senses so we don’t even know how the original "truly" looks like, therefore we can’t really know how we generate knowledge about it...we only have to work with the representation of reality we have. If i had to guess i would say that when the senses are excited by outer events, they start to exhibit bioelectric activity. In other words the bit in the objective reality only started a reaction, our body somehow comprehended the information and from then on it’s only the body’s energy and information that travels. Am I understood?

So pretty much what Mutarana and Varela said. But why they incorporated the thought that no knowledge is transferred is strange - of course it is:D that’s how humanity improves. If we didnt have way how to transfer knowledge we would be like all other species that start from the scratch every single summer (again - City tackles that problem too:D). That doesn’t have to be part of that paragraph for it to make sense actually.

Pekna praca!
So is it possible that the "in one ear and out the other" informations that leads to an action potential doesn't reach the threshold-value at all? But how does consciousness decide which information should remain between the ears?
And my second question: Could it be predestination for diabetes, if consciousness allows unfiltered informations?

Diky:)
As far as I understood the matter, when the neuros are excited our body uses some energy and the neurons reach an active state. Maintaining this state doesn’t cost energy but then when we need to save the information we have to “stop the excitement” which costs energy again (this process is repeated many times possibly during a very short period of time).
I think that when the neuros are activated, we can enter this hibernation mode (we can often time feel this state after like an hour of an intense lecture – when we have repeated that process to many times and we are entering the state of information overload). The reason for that is that we lack imminent access to energy reserves – we simply don’t have enough anymore.

We therefore enter this "in one ear and out the other" state either because we don’t have enough energy to deactivate the neurons, or when we voluntarily decide that the information is irrelevant for us. And that is done through our endocept – described in previous chapter.

And about the second question. Could you elaborate a bit more? I don’t really see where you’re going so I don’t know what to answer:P.

Interesting.!

Where can we find the other chapters?

Regards

Posted using Partiko Android

good first half of the article are linked "Previously published" chapters:)

Amazing thesis topic, such an important issue in The nowadays society🌎!

Posted using Partiko iOS





This post has been voted on by the SteemSTEM curation team and voting trail in collaboration with @curie.

If you appreciate the work we are doing then consider voting both projects for witness by selecting stem.witness and curie!

For additional information please join us on the SteemSTEM discord and to get to know the rest of the community!

Hi @fingersik!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.733 which ranks you at #1455 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 23 places in the last three days (old rank 1478).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 253 contributions, your post is ranked at #109.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Some people are already following you, keep going!
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • You have already shown user engagement, try to improve it further.

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Congratulations @fingersik! You received a personal award!

Thank you for your participation in the "Meet The Steemians" contest in Kraków. We hope you enjoyed it and made lots of new friends. See you at SteemFest4!

Click here to view your Board of Honor

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

Meet the Steemians Contest - The results, the winners and the prizes
Meet the Steemians Contest - Special attendees revealed
Meet the Steemians Contest - Intermediate results

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63493.34
ETH 2578.53
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.79