AI Generated Content / 인공지능 생성 콘텐츠?
AI Generated Content? What the ...?
Everyone should stop everything and copy and paste the post you've written today, and you will find your results.
Personally, I do not believe this https://www.zerogpt.com/ website. It produces false claims.
(모든 분이 당장 지금 모든 일을 멈쳐 본인이 오늘 쓰신 글을 얼른 "복사/붙여 넣기"를 하시고 이 웹사이트 (https://www.zerogpt.com/ )에 들어가셔서 결과를 확인해보세요. 사실, 저는 이 웹사이트를 ->https://www.zerogpt.com/)믿지 않습니다.)
아니, 어떻게 "안녕하세요. 카일입니다"가 100% AI Generated내용이 될 수가 있어요?
This is ridiculous. 뭔소리죠?!
I have been called out on this platform for an absurd false claim and I'm sure many other people have, too.
Go ahead, copy and paste your writing in https://www.zerogpt.com/. You will be surprised how false it is.
We need to come together as one and submit this to the top Steem Witness here on Steemit to stop the "Abuse Detectors" and their mistakenly claimed accusations at once.
Even @dobartim is supposedly 100% plagarized according to the zerogpt website, and I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS FALSE ACCUSATION that this "detector" is and the "detector" should be banned for false accusations.
@etainclub님, @oldstone님, @successgr님, 그리고 @goodpost-kr님은 왜 100% ai이죠? 썰마!
I would appreciate it if my name were taken off the "blacklist" or wherever it is and remove the WARNING immediately. Because we are ALL innocent here. Every person on this list is INNOCENT.
@goodpost-kr and @jungjunghoon are innocent, too. They don't use AI, either.
여러분! 확인해 보세요. 놀라실 겁니다.
(100%란 얘기는 쓰신 글이 100% AI로 쓰셨다는 뜻입니다)
100% means that AI wrote all of your writing. How do you feel after looking at the results?
A little pissed or upset, right?
(by the way, this list is a random list of people. Basically, I closed my eyes and picked random writers here on Steemit to see the percentage rate the "detector" found.
Results: 22/28
그 멍청한 웹사이트 (zerogpt)에 따르면 28명 중에 22명이 ai를 쓰셨다는 겁니다. 말도 안 돼요.ㅋ
@dobartim 100%
@remnant39 100%
@peterchung 100%
@happyworkingmom 100%
@jungjunghoon 100%
@etainclub 100%
@oldstone 100.01%
@veronicalee 100%
@sungjumom 100%
@sonki999 100%
@banguri 100%
@pircoin 100%
@successgr 100%
@successgr.with 100%
@khaiyoui 100%
@goodpost-kr 100%
@ayogom 100%
@epitt925 100%
@happyberrysboy 94.57%
@raah 99.98%
@dorian-lee 100%
@powerego 100%
@alexpmorris 0%
@xpilar 5%
@stef1 0%
@kryptodenno 0%
@upvu 0%
@nainaztengra 15%
Yours Sincerely, @gungho
@fly-dragon, please read to clear your accusations.
https://steemit.com/hive-152587/@dobartim/why-it-is-best-to-learn-something-new-from-everyone
Who believes @dobartim used 100% AI? I don't believe the zerogpt site to be the best tool for trying to "detect" ai and plagarism. @dobartim is the best of the best on Steemit. He doesn't use AI.
Let's all respect each other and our writings. Let's remove the ridiculous accusations. All of us have been on Steemit for like 4 or 5+ years or something. Let's get real. None of us use AI to write our posts. Let's stop this nonsense at once. I hope I made my point clear.
Have a good day, and see you in the next post.
I don't necessarily agree that all of the accounts in that list are consistently posting human generated content or that there's no use of AI going at all - even among longstanding community members. But I do agree that a single report from a single site is not enough to be anywhere near certain.
I have, informally, adopted rules something like this when I curate in Popular STEM:
Also, I agree with this comment from @chriddi. The use of online translators makes it even more difficult to be sure, because they probably use the same sort of statistics that AI large language models use in order to perform the translation.
A final point that I have grappled with: if we can't tell, does it matter? The point of content creation is to bring human attention to the blockchain. It could be argued that rewards should go to the posts that do that best - perhaps without regard for whether they were created by humans or not. I'm not ready to make that argument. It just feels wrong. But I don't have a strong refutation, either.
It is!
Remember that with every user you attract with such opportunities, you also lose one who is simply disgusted by it.
How many users have we lost because of HRoI services? Many!!! They just couldn't stand this unbalance, these high rewards for spam (which immediately catches the eye of every newcomer, while their own painstakingly crafted posts are no longer seen)...
But no, how polemical - these are the best, most honest (daily) bloggers of the platform...
I should note that there's clearly an ethical argument against posting AI content under the pretense of being human-generated. I was thinking purely from a utilitarian perspective.
This is a good point.
I have seen a couple of posts on this lately. These people need to use their mind and just not go with the auto results. I believe that all posts which has majorly psychology related content gets picked up as AI content. So even if few words match, which will ideally be for 99% of the posts, it will show as AI content. Even my content shows 15% whereas the fact is that I am not even aware of what AI tools and links provide this type of information. The people who are monitoring this need to put time and effort in reading the posts and recognizing if it is a possible AI content or not. Content where personal references are made and experiences are shared will not be AI content.
Yes, it is a matter of respect for each one and at the same time mutually and cordially tackling this situation with the watchers.
|... and the "detector" should be banned for false accusations.... |
I mean the detector tool zerogpt.com should be banned, just to be clear (not the person)
Holy! who made this? i tested with my post, then it says 100% AI generated.
What do we do about this situation?
[참가신청 ~4/12(수), 그리고 후원 요청] STEEM FEST KOREA 2023 - 4/29(토) 오후 3시 서울 문래동 브루스카
https://steemit.com/hive-192912/@fly-dragon/plagiarism-and-ai-content-report-by-fly-dragon-date-11-04-2023
알고 보니까 @fly-dragon님이 그냥 '복사 붙어놓기'를 해서 확인한 것 같네요. 이 방법은 AI를 탐지하는 데 효과적이지 않다고 생각합니다.
Now the question is.... why is it that when I tagged all these people, no one received the MENTION in their notifications? Has it been turned off?
Apparently, there's a limit for how many mentions can be included in a post that determines whether or not the notifications get sent. See this post from @moecki.
I see. I did not know this. Thank you for the link and information.
You're welcome. Until that post, I didn't know it either. It was a lucky coincidence that he posted when he did.
Please go to our abuse watcher's discord server and say what you wanna say in appeal channel .
our discord server link - here
And you shouldn't be too much crazy . we may wrong about your case but NOT in most of .