The Economist Cover for 2017: Start of an analysis

This is the translation of yesterdays post in German

Unfortunately there are only a few German articles about the new cover of the Economist. (This is not true for articles in English, there are quite a lot, still my interpretation and those to come are mostly not yet found) Usually a lot of things are written and thought about. Perhaps that is because the theme is (again) incredibly complex and there are enough other things to deal with. I will to try to summarize what I have found.

Some pre-thoughts for those, who read for the first time about the crazy theories concerning the Economist Cover:

The Economist is an English magazine of high finance, which is owned by the Rothschild family (at least 50%). The Rothschild family has more than one link with the occult, a little "googling" usually leads to massive stories, conspiracy theories, but also some clear facts.

Personally, I do not believe in predetermination or the possibility of predicting the future clearly, but I believe that there are people who firmly believe in these matters. I am also quite certain that the goal of the "evil" Satanists is to become "god-like", which is reached by making one's own prediction come true by their own actions.

I should be forgiven if, as a beginner in these matters, I sometimes will confuse the words "occult", "satanism" and alike. But I don´t want to dig deeper than I did so far, because I actually feel "stained" already.

The cover of the Economist may be such a medium: Prediction of planned things, warnings, assumptions by means of probability calculations, etc. For example: With little imagination on the cover of 2015 the terror attacks in Paris in autumn 2016 were"predicted".

The new cover is now available and I was very curious, what I will discover in it. I compared my findings with the things that others have discovered.

Let's take a look at what we see ...

There are eight cards from a tarot. Two of the cards are moved, the rest are "in order". Obviously it is about Trump and many associations around him. Destruction, protests, death, and later on, some more soothing cards like "the magician" using a 3D house printer and "the star". Overall, however, the mood is rather threatening. But what would be an Economist cover, if you could cover it with only one or two views. In addition, one has to take into account the satanic background and the fact that you´d have to optimize the interpretation to possible goals from their point of view.

So I began to dig into the subject of tarot. TinEye provided the first approaches, so I found out, that the tarotdeck of Rider-White was used as a basis. The next thing that was interesting for me were the countless different ways to lay the cards. However, there seems to be only one "classic" laying system using 8 cards. The so-called "Lemniskate". Four cards define a question and the remaining 4 provide the answer or approach. Actually, the lemniscate is about relationships, and in fact the system is placed in the form of an infinity loop with the third and seventh cards overlapping each other.

Let´s "re-read" now the laid cards:

Tower	Death

The cards 1 (tower) and 5 (death) show what is concealed or what separates the "asker" and the "asked about" from each other. Well, this gives somehow morbid meaning.

Judgement	Magician

The cards 2 (Trump / judgement) and 6 (Magician) shows the conscious motives of the questioners (in our case the Rothschilds). One might think the question is "will Trump make his announcements come true and thus create prosperity just like a magician?"

World	Wheel of fortune

The cards 3 (World) and 7 (Wheel of Fortune) show the conflict. A networked(internet), enlightened (sun) world in conflict with the "right-wing populists" Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen on the ascending branch and Merkel, hit by lightning, whois on the descending branch. This could be seen as quite clear logic.

Star	Hermit

Finally, the cards 8 (Star) and 4 (Hermit) which should show "The unconscious motives and unrecognized patterns in the behavior of the questioner and the other person". So, one of them will control a mass of protesters who can hardly be restrained wanting to show the "right way" and the other one only satisfies his greed for attention as a "star". I assume, in the self-understanding of the Rothschilds, this also makes sense: The dumb mass must be tamed and Trump is seen as merely an attention-seeking star, which will soon burn like a shooting star or a comet.

Seems simple, seems good, but in my opinion this reading pattern is quite wrong, respectively, only one possible way of reading. There is so much more trouble and work invested in the cover, so that it takes a much deeper and more accurate considerations.

But more of of this it in one of my next posts.
Until next time!

Yours, @pollux.one