Don’t falsely accuse me of being a misogynist
The pot calling the kettle black. How ironic and hypocritical when an accuser falsely accuses (or forms an unspoken opinion) asserting that someone else is or is doing something which that accuser subconsciously is or is doing.
Jesus warned about that sort of myopia, “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?”
@eeks wrote:
I have personally gotten into a confrontation with him for misogynistic hate posting, so yes, I am fully aware of his track record. This post should not have been flagged.
And by the way, who anointed you as the wise sage of ethics? For some reason I’m imagining you as a thinks-he-knows-it-all snotty brat who blows green snot all over everything while proclaiming the truth. The following is presented for your remedial edification.
Falsely accusing me of hating women is very unethical and can also be classified as hate speech (at least by those who want to limit what is free speech by classifying speech). That is propaganda and sensationalism. Many people might just assume you’re correct without taking the time to truly understand my side. I have not written any hate against women. I have admonished (c.f. also) the ideology and corrupt motivation of feminists who are destroying women, men, family, and society.
I’m all about freedom for everyone. But coercive theft is not freedom.
A person incapable of clear thinking would presume that hate for women equates with social commentary expressing analysis of society’s politically correct ideology. That sort of accusation is a ploy that propagandists employ to shut off the pre-frontal cortex so that people are incapable of clear thinking. Their minds get pushed into the primitive, post-paleozoic, hunter-gatherer fight-or-flight hindbrain mode of human nature. I debated someone recently who referred to this hindbrain as the “lizard brain”.
Do you really think by ignoring damned facts that you’re really looking out for the best interests of women. I posit that White Knighting is actually very harmful to women because it creates moral hazard and many other deleterious ramifications some of which have deleterious effects on the natural reproductive happiness of women. It is as if you do not understand that many women are not happy if they can’t find what they think is a “strong man”. When the State destroys all the strength of men, then even a devout liberal genius such as Eric Raymond explains that the females end up unhappy because they can’t find any males at their perceived status level. I am fully in agreement with allowing women the freedom to destroy themselves with their own hypergamy if they do wish (heck I may even partake as their hypergamous target of infatuation), as long as society doesn’t make me pay for it with taxes and the coercive collectivized power to steal from the man in divorce (because for one reason this enables the power vacuum that drags us into World Wars and megadeath). I have written damned facts about genders, hypergamy, feminism and such. These facts may be difficult for you to accept. Just as it may be difficult for those who support Socialism to admit that the Communists have killed 50–100 million people in the 20th century and admit that Socialism is just Communism in disguise.
I’m also in agreement with females achieving what they can achieve as long as it’s a meritocracy of the free market, not the government trampling on the free market causing the society to collapse by for example forcing companies to hire females for jobs they can’t do well. I do take notice of females who excel for example in STEM fields. I am not against those exceptional cases. I even work on decentralization technology which knows nothing about gender and provides a level meritorious playing field.
Even Jordan Peterson explained that the very high IQ female attorneys in the top law firms quit by their late 20s or early 30s to go make a family. This is just one of those damned facts of nature that women can’t even understand about their own plight even when women admit that females are inherently misogynist! (as they were programmed to be by evolution)
Laura Callaghan, for The New York Times
Fantasies about how everyone should be equal are just fantasies. Fantasies are not reality. Fantasies crash hard into reality. Every damn time in human history. Do you want some more megadeath with that fantasy? Or can I somehow convince you to wake up your pre-frontal cortex since I presume you’re a male then you should have the capability of overcoming hindbrain emotion and being rational.
click here to read some irrational propaganda from a feminist
The above linked irrational blog hasn’t cited any of the conflicting data. The reason that females consume more than males is because they’re hypergamous and they prioritize human relations, emotions, and feelings. These conclusions are supported by all the data. And is that even a bad thing that women are women? Would we prefer that women became men and men become women? Lunacy.
https://blog.jim.com/culture/on-punching-women/
White knights are evil men – a man who white knights another man’s woman is a man who will spread hateful lies about his friend behind his friend’s back to sow discord and anger between friends. A man who white knights another man’s woman also engages in every kind of depraved and cowardly evil. When you punch a woman, no matter how much she deserves it, you show weakness and loss of frame, and weakness attracts evil. Deal with a misbehaving woman with firmness and strength, you will have no problems. Deal with her from weakness, white knights will materialize like flies on rotting meat.
P.S. I of course agree with your admonishment of @chryspano for abusing the flagging feature. And we now see that my predictions of Steem’s failure are coming to fruition. In 2016 I had proposed decentralized curation to ameliorate that abuse.
Westerners wasting time on nonsense while Asians are busy-bees being very productive and marching ahead economically:
Great post! The points you have made are valid. There's no way men and women will ever be equal. We each have our own "super" powers. Bottom line is that there's some sort of advantage by creating division among men and women. Someone is winning and someone is loosing. :) Best wishes to you.
Inevitably somebody will quote something I wrote in the past and try to claim I am a racist even though I attended an elementary school in Baton Rouge in the 1970s in which my sister and I were the only non-negro students in the school. We were such peculiarities that the other students were always rubbing their hands on my fine blonde hair because they’d never felt non-negro hair before.
I think when “white folks” complain about immigrants in for example California, they’re really complaining about the fact that the laws aren’t enforced fairly:
They are complaining about the Democrats doing everything they can to bring as many immigrants as possible in and treating those immigrants better than the original citizens, in order to take the power away from the original citizens and put it in the hands of the elite beneficiaries of the political process (e.g. George Soros, the Clinton Foundation, and other various corruptions). We have an analogous sort of corruption on the other (currently orange colored) Republican head of the political beast. Politics is not a solution.
This is the political power vacuum I have been writing about in recent blogs. And my explanation that democracy doesn’t work for us and actually divides-and-conquers us.
So my point is I like immigrants. I like diversity. I was born in New Orleans and I like people of African lineage. I like people!
I dislike democracy because it is and will always be a corruption. I want a free market. I want for everyone to be free to go to, work, and invest in any country without a visa. But to have that, we must first destroy these governments and democracies that manipulate us as pawns on a chessboard against each other. This is a complex problem.
Let’s see what we can accomplish with decentralized social media.
I realize females would not typically be as interested in these grand civilization organization schemes. But I presume you are interested in a world where humans can love each other. Please try to understand that the propaganda we’re inundated with concerning compassion for immigrants (or any other “minority”) is really a corrupt way for them to destroy the political power of the law abiding citizens who were already here. There’s nothing compassionate in their true corrupt motivation to turn the people against each other by manufacturing conflict. The ancient history of who populated North America first (such as my ancestors who were marched in the Trail of Tears) is irrelevant. We need solutions, not war.
That is my way of saying that I’m also not a racist.
I think with a free market and without the government stomping on us, we can coexist all in the same society, because for example if a particular group wants to have a more strict neighborhood, then they can make their own subdivision with their own homeowners association and strict bylaws. I live in such a subdivision in the Philippines, because I got tired of living in the general community because of the habits of filipinos such as playing karaoke all night at full volume. I like filipinos, but it doesn’t mean all of their lifestyle habits are compatible with my current lifestyle. Yet in other times my lifestyle was more compatible with non-stop partying. The problem is right now the California government would for example overrule the homeowner’s association and force them to alter their rules to be egalitarian. This is why “white folks” are angry. They want to be able to maintain their way of life. And anyway, I am not even 100% “white”. I have Cherokee ancestry in addition to my European lineage.
"The ancient history of who populated North America first (such as my ancestors who were marched in the Trail of Tears) is irrelevant. We need solutions, not war"....enough said!
Really thank you so much Nora for having the courage and allocating the time+effort to comment. 😗 I agree wholeheartedly with your concise summary.
Indeed there’s a political power vacuum which divides-and-conquers we-the-people. But I don’t want us to waste our time getting ourselves worked up into a frenzy. The solution should be matter-of-fact, elegant, and natural.
I hope and believe we (collectively the developers and the users) can do something about this with decentralized ledger technology and for example social networking on decentralized ledgers.
P.S. “special powers” (also and one more!). 😀
I wrote a detailed comment today which can quickly get readers up-to-speed if they’re interested to delve a bit into the history of Steem and the alleged corruption of Steem that has to be fixed.
A new study in 27 countries shows that widespread political division is much worse than it was 10 years ago.
Inviting everyone to feedback on naming a necessary competitor to Steem.