Lee Camp: Leak’n’hack

lighteye (71)in #news • 7 years ago (edited)

What would be the best way of acting if you see your house is on fire? Just scream “Russia!” as loud as you can. That solves everything. Guaranteed. But in this episode, Lee has at least two more important things to explain. First, it is a clear distinction between the Leak and the Hack. Who knows why that knowledge would be useful… The other thing is something that you never can see on MSM: A precise geographical positioning of DNC and Russia!

But before you start watching this episode, you've got to ask yourself one question:

Do I trust MSM or my own eyes?

Two questions, that is:

Would I give up governance to the people who like to torture people for fun and profit?

OK, three questions:

Would I give a limb for a fat Burger?

Last year WikiLeaks showed Clinton’s campaign to be laughably corrupt, and suggested that the “D” in “DNC” was perhaps inserted ironically. The media promptly began focusing on the source of this information by equating WikiLeaks with “Russian hackers,” instead of analyzing the proven corruption and its implications. A group founded in 2003 to question the WMD narrative from which our consent was manufactured to attack Iraq, has re-emerged to question the Russian hacking narrative politicians and media pundits have hammered into our brains since the election. Hard science from these forensic investigators and intelligence analysts now demonstrates the Podesta emails came from a leak, not a hack. Corporate media, unsurprisingly, won’t touch this story, as it would indict them to a devastating degree. The most nefarious things about endless media repetition of the Russian hacking narrative is that it’s been sold to us as an “attack” and an “an act of war,” and that Democratic politicians don’t have to reflect on the neoliberal economic policies that caused so many to vote for Trump in the (false) hope that he’d represent a change. In sum, the military industrial complex wins, and the Democratic establishment successfully avoids all scrutiny of neglecting the people it claims to represent.

In the second half, correspondent Naomi Karavani speaks of the joys of — torture! Psychologists behind the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program have settled out of their court case with three torture victims defended by the ACLU. These “architects” were paid 81 million dollars for their techniques, yet this torture was largely ineffective. And the settlement is unsurprising, because if this went to court it would be overwhelmingly bad PR for the CIA.

NK - 2017-08-26_114432.jpg

Finally, correspondent Natalie McGill stops at Burger King. After discounting their heart-stopping Stacker Burger for one day, Burger King gave 50% of that day’s profits to a startup making 3D prosthetic arms. Burger King Argentina has been airing a commercial showing that you It’s ironic because fast food increases the chance of amputations.

NMG - 2017-08-26_114645.jpg