Trump, Imperialist In Chief

in #informationwar5 years ago

Quick reality check: in the conflict between America and Iran, America is the aggressor, Iran the victim. Let's all be clear about the facts that won't be discussed in the mainstream media; Trump wants this conflict escalated. This is not a mistake, miscalculation or for the protection of the American people. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were no mistakes, not a waste of trillions of dollars, not for the instigators of these wars; for them they're a marvelous source of income.


Donald_Trump_small.jpg
source: Wikimedia Commons

It's all over the news and all over the internet, so you probably know by now that Trump ordered the assassination of Iran general Qassem Suleimani by drone-strike. The neocons who started the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the shadow government behind Bush consisting of hawkish warmongers like Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Kristol and Perle, have had Iran on their war-wish-list for years, and it seems they finally found a commander in chief who's stupid enough to grant them their ill-begotten wish. Trump said in reaction that this assassination was ordered for the protection of Americans. It's quite unbelievable, but I bet that there's actually still people around who believe him, even people who cheer him on; I used to pity those people, I still do, for this can only come from ignorance induced by loads of misinformation, but we're coming to a point that this ignorance is becoming dangerous. You need to wake up, really, it's almost a last chance to be on the right side of history.

I won't go on to describe the obvious danger here; starting yet another full-blown war in the Middle East that will cost innumerous innocent deaths on all sides of the conflict. You can watch the videos (please do) in this post; the first one is not directly related but shows a lot about the mindset behind all this warmongering. I just want to concentrate on the big lie behind all this, the lie by omission. Like I said in the opening paragraph, Iran is the victim here by any measure. Let's not forget history and remember that this conflict goes back to 1953 at the very least, and actually goes all the way back to right before the Great War, when the Middle East's oil-rich region was already divvied up between the great western powers of the time, mainly the United Kingdom and France, culminating in the Sykes–Picot Agreement. In this secret agreement the Middle East was simply cut up in pieces (just look at a map and see all the straight borders between those nations; literally lines drawn on a map instead of "natural" borders), like spoiled kids sharing their marbles saying "one for you, one for me, one for you..."


Chilling Video Shows Navy SEALs Describe Pardoned War Criminal


That's imperialism defined, right there. If that's not enough to convince you, in 1953 the United Kingdom and America got rid of Iran's democratically elected president Mohammad Mosaddegh and gave Iran the Ayatollah; if that's not imperialism I don't know what is. It's certainly not spreading freedom and democracy, the excuse still used for the other illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In the late 1970s and 1980s America once again was involved in imperialistic warmongering using Iran as one of its pieces on the chessboard in the Iran–Contra affair. I hope, dear reader, that if you've made it this far, it's becoming increasingly clear that Iran can not be seen as agressors in the current conflict, not by any stretch of the imagination.

Oil wasn't as important before the first world war, as every motor was still driven by coals. But the United Kingdom had the world's biggest fleet back then, needed to patrol their world empire, so they needed the oil badly when everything transitioned from coal to oil. You can look up the complete history of the region yourself but for now it's enough to understand that all countries in that region have been the theater of war over vital resources for over a century now. For more than 100 years we, the West, have controlled the region by installing puppet dictatorial regimes and removing all leaders who dared use their resources how they saw fit. Saddam Hussein was an evil dictator, for sure, but he was OUR evil dictator, especially when he helped us fight the war against Iran. As soon as he threatened to trade Iranian oil through European banks, using Euro's instead of Dollars, he became part of Bush's infamous Axis of Evil, comprising Iran, Iraq, and North Korea.


Iran Expert Trita Parsi: We may already be at war with Iran


In defense of Trump it has to be said that he's the first American president in modern history who occasionally openly admits that the wars are about the resources, the oil, gas and minerals. On the other hand there's no way to know if this is honesty or sheer foolishness; personally I think it's the latter. I mean, in 2011 or 2012 he tweeted repeatedly that he suspected that Obama would start a war with Iran in order to be re-elected. Trump even said that it was because of Obama's lack in negotiation-skills; just watch the below linked video for a vivid reminder of that. Now, at the very start of 2020 he's doing exactly what he thought Obama would do, start a war with Iran in order to increase his chances for re-election; history clearly shows that "war presidents" usually get high approval ratings. This is conjecture on my part, no way to prove it, so take that as you will. There's no arguing facts though, and the facts are that Trump's administration has done everything possible to get that war, starting with throwing away the nuclear non-proliferation deal that Obama reached with Iran, and which Iran has honored even after the U.S. broke that deal. Add this latest and shocking assassination, and we should expect nothing less than a further escalation in the quagmire that we created over there. I know for a fact that if I was a native of Iraq of Iran, I would be standing with the protesters that demand that American soldiers leave their country, and that they leave yesterday.

The future of the world is balancing on a knife's edge, and the knife is held by an unstable spoiled brat who wouldn't recognize a fatal mistake if it bit him in the ass. If you're one of those deeply misguided souls who still support this administrative mental asylum and is cheering on the clown at its head, I can only be sorry for you and for the world you help create. Trump has committed a terrorist act, a brutal public assassination, and he should expect nothing less in return. Please spare us the reactions that try an excuse this behavior by explaining how bad and inhumane the Iranian general was; he's the product of more than a century of brutal oppression by western forces, we created him like we created Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and all the other evil dictators that suppress their own people for us to get cheap resources; you reap what you sow.


Trump Risks War After Assassinating Top Iranian General


Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep steeming!


wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>Freedom From Choice
#BernieBlackout Ending?Cleaning Up War
It's Good To Be The KingHey Ya!
How Profits Make Us Less HumaneScreaming Vegetables

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!
Helpienaut_post_banner_02-01.png

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented.

wave-13 divider odrau steem

@helpie is a WITNESS now! So please help @helpie help you by voting for us here!Helpie_01.png

Sort:  

We knew this was coming and now it is unfolding. I am not so sure I believe people are asleep anymore, I am starting to believe the lack of needed change is purely fear based. The agenda is so obvious that I just cannot reconcile peoples inability to see..

We can collapse this tyrannical system so easily, so quickly.. but then.. We wouldn't be able to go to Walmart and pick up a chicken dinner anymore, no.. We might have to go out and collect firewood for heat, we might have to lose some luxuries for a while and rebuild..

Dependency, fear, and polarization are such effective methods for control of the masses.

We're literally getting ready to take a front row seat to the slaughter and we're too afraid to save ourselves. (Collectively speaking.)

People cannot be this blind, we need to dispel fear.

I'm not really sure what else to say regarding this deeply disturbing news.

Thank you as always for your publications my friend.

Yes, it is probably also the case that the people indirectly give their rulers justice by consuming heavily, proclaiming all rights for themselves, going on vacations diligently, wanting to have everything at all times, and assuming that the standard not only needs to be maintained but even further improved, whatever that may mean.

Going back to getting firewood and living in dependent communities or micro-societies is probably such a frightening idea that no one can really imagine it being feasible. Nevertheless, the tendencies are there: towards nationalism, back into the family, a return to paternalistic religion? In some parts, at least, this can be observed. No one really has an answer to it.

I hold the same view as the German economist Niko Paech: if possible, I'm adapting to a post-growth economy. Where I will have to do without a lot of things and luxuries without being shocked by it or being haunted by despair. I started my life about ten years ago to switch to an economy based on rather renunciation and I have not yet quite made the leap into the culture of exchange and repair, although I am learning a part of it. For example, I sew clothes and don't buy new clothes, but used ones.

It is difficult to accept a world that is global and yet create micro-societies that are local. I would agree with both, because otherwise how to avoid all this war? The drivers of innovation, for example, who develop a technology that is independent of oil and other earthly resources, are probably always somewhat in the minority, and again it is impossible to foresee how much even innovation requires raw materials. It really does seem to me that one viable way is to restrict oneself as much as possible voluntarily in terms of nutrition, mobility and other things. Insofar as this self-restriction is not practised by majorities, some voices fear that in future one would have to live under an eco-dictatorship.

As always, we do not know.

I agree, people really aren't blind to what is been seen as highly problematic. They just don't have easy answers.

That's what I keep saying to myself: people can't be this blind... But then I see some Fox News reports, and read an article by Ben Shapiro, and then I see: people CAN be this blind. What they're blinded by varies, but blinded they are; I believe you're right that it's mostly fear based...

I think you're also spot on when you speak of a collective fear of losing the comforts that have become part of our materialistic western identities. Your response, as well as the one from @erh.germany describe that beautifully :-)

Thanks so much @futuremind; I really appreciate your regular visits and valuable comments :-)

This article misses the entire embassy attack. (i.e. the stated spark for the assassination. ) It's sort of important. Unless that didn't really happen.

Unless that didn't really happen.

Well something happened. The question is, what is your version? In the USA it seems the fake news cabal mainstream is somehow programming folks that it was Iranians that stormed the embassy.

Is that what you think too? Because it was Iraqis that did that.

It didn't happen, at least not like it's been reported; I refer you to @oldoneeye's response. Also, the stated spark wasn't that, it was the supposed immediate threat of further terrorist actions against Americans that had to be stopped. When asked for proof of this, we get silence; there is no proof, just like there was no proof for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Lastly, and most importantly in my opinion, any military or other violent action against America should be seen as purely defensive action; they didn't invade America.

Hi @zyx066!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.896 which ranks you at #4553 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 80 contributions, your post is ranked at #41.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
  • The readers like your work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.026
BTC 58961.27
ETH 2500.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.45