This article misses the entire embassy attack. (i.e. the stated spark for the assassination. ) It's sort of important. Unless that didn't really happen.
This article misses the entire embassy attack. (i.e. the stated spark for the assassination. ) It's sort of important. Unless that didn't really happen.
Well something happened. The question is, what is your version? In the USA it seems the fake news cabal mainstream is somehow programming folks that it was Iranians that stormed the embassy.
Is that what you think too? Because it was Iraqis that did that.
It didn't happen, at least not like it's been reported; I refer you to @oldoneeye's response. Also, the stated spark wasn't that, it was the supposed immediate threat of further terrorist actions against Americans that had to be stopped. When asked for proof of this, we get silence; there is no proof, just like there was no proof for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Lastly, and most importantly in my opinion, any military or other violent action against America should be seen as purely defensive action; they didn't invade America.