You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 👨🏻💻 10001 Steemit Content Interface (SCI) Update: Communities & Enhancements
All right, you have blacklisted abusers that were abusing burnsteem tags, but has the site blacklisted or banned them too? What surprises me is that when you flag a user as a moderator, you get an upvote from 01, but the accused get neither a downvote nor are banned or even warned.
They are still posting and earning, or maybe they have found newer ways of abusing with a new user profile picture but using the same profile. I can give you at least five examples with proofs.
The blacklist on my interface is for various reasons, often just shitty spam rather than tag abuse. Only a handful have been picked up by steem watchers or are getting downvoted by them.
My views on it all are long, complicated and rather depressing. The most recent situation with zunqi1 is a good example. She was an obviously fake account (fake profile pic, plagiarised content), promoted by another user so received undue upvotes. Despite subsequently being highlighted as a plagiarist and liar (which I got an upvote for), the user has not rescinded the support and most of the votes remain (although some downvotes were distributed). I won’t go into additional detail, I made my feelings clear in the comments of her following post which you can read - I’ll send you a link if you’re not sure what I’m referring to.
As you know, I’ve wasted a lot of my life catching abusers. They don’t stop, they go again. The rewards don’t reflect the effort required, especially when they don’t get downvoted.
I’m on my phone so have kept my response relatively brief. Let me know if I’ve missed anything or you fancy a rant. I’m sure my feelings will at the very least echo yours.
I know what you mean! I have given up the mod's job just because no one was serious about my reports (when I say no one that means no one). I wasn't doing all the hard work for a random upvote coming from big voters so I thought it's better to see the drama from a distance.
Yes, I would love to see more drama so all links are welcome.
Well... this is probably a good comment to start from - you'll see the parent post and who was supported. You won't have seen the evidence that the supported user's profile picture is fake but it's pretty obvious when you go to her introduction post.
Rather than acknowledging her mistake (which she has yet to do), she pushed forward, prompting this reply. A reply which she appears to have completely misunderstood the point of 🤷
So sometimes, it's not just a case of finding a plagiarist, it's for users who promoted the plagiarist to acknowledge and rectify their mistake... which can be hard when their ego is greater than their SP.
Is it worth the effort? Hard to say. I'm not going to waste my time catching every abuser... but I'm going to point out when somebody's being promoted for (potentially) hundreds of dollars of rewards because they've not bothered to check them properly.
That's right! They know all the tricks of the trade. I have a similar case and if you see the end result, you will be even more surprised.
Check this post
https://ecency.com/relevant/@kazirahul12/a-zamindar-house-built-in
Then check this post
https://steemit.com/hive-185836/@mainuna/an-ancient-structure-built-in
Then check the comment section of this post
https://steemit.com/hive-179660/@mainuna/an-old-zamidar-house-in-my-area-or-or
And now check the mod of this post and he is now mod of two communities
https://steemit.com/hive-120861/@fajrulakmal99/the-diary-game-or-or-10-januari-2024-or-or-kesibukan-di-kebun-dan-bersama-keluarga#@steemcurator01/s77i9z
@dove11
We are not the same person. My ID and @rahulkazi are two different people. You can verify if you want. If you want to verify then you can tell me. Don't put others behind.
If you two are different persons then it is even more serious. You have copy pasted a post from hive blog and posted it here in WOX community and then reposted it in HWC. If you want more proof, I can give you more. So accept it and follow the rules.
Whenever you share a link, the username will trigger a notification to them so expect them to come and reply!
There are definitely shared photos across both posts, that cannot be denied. So "travel around together and take their own photos" appears to be dishonest when a photo like the below is used in both posts:
It would be impossible to claim that they both managed to take this photo.
It's a lot of effort, but highlighting indisputable details like this allows no room for argument. Although they will inevitably argue - they always do.
The content and look at this image
My thoughts are the same as my previous reply... personally, I wouldn't trust any of their accounts.