Coronavirus: Censorship and Satanism
Censorship is a sure sign of totalitarianism. If you want to know what kind of totalitarianism it is, you need to pay attention to what type of content is being censored…
Censorship is – in its essence – gagging the whole society. Removing freedom of speech, freedom of movement and freedom of assembly from a society that has been accustomed to the fairy tale of democracy for 70 years, is in fact murder of a society, and must inevitably provoke an explosive reaction. Therefore, if you were to be a tyrant who wants to stifle the natural reaction of the people, you have to create a ‘new normal’ – completely unnatural situation in which resistance to your decision will be ‘justifiably’ outlawed. And there is no better unnatural situation than a ‘deadly virus pandemic’…
Free speech no more…
We’ll start this post with a video that should attract your attention. It is not the famous ‘Plandemic’ video by Dr. Judy Mikovits, but it is all about the censorship launched against that video. There is no better way to attract your attention than letting a beautiful and smart young woman to explain why ‘Plandemic’ was censored and removed, and why it should concern you:
Whom to believe? Dr. Judy Mikovits or those ‘benevolent’ censors who are trying to ‘protect your health’? Here is a simple instruction: Whenever there is a controversial topic, the best way to find the truth is – dialogue between the sides. That is called ‘free speech’. When one side evades dialogue using a brute force, censoring the other side, and use its centralized platforms for discreditation like this…
Wikipedia page BEFORE:
Wikipedia page AFTER:
…then you should know which side you can’t trust. And BTW, with his YouTube censorship, Google had made a favor to Dr. Judy Mikovits, causing a Streisand effect.
The monstrous idea that there are no experts outside the ‘official’ narrative must be squashed before it make an irreparable damage. There is not a single evidence that Covid-19 has caused on his own a single death:
And instead of someone who can challenge the story of Dr. Andrew Kaufman, we can only expect taking over his contents from the centralized media platforms. But that is only a starting point…
I guess it would be irrelevant to ask a few simple questions to the corporate media, because they would be easily dismissed as ‘conspiracy theories’. Thanks to this platform, we have a free speech, and we can discuss about some uncanny coincidences. Both sides – those who support ‘conspiracy theories’, and those who can debunk them with facts. For example, we can start with the questions posed by Joaquin Flores, editor at our @fortrussnews. First question, for all the readers:
And no, it is not a Photoshop, as you can see from the original interview video:
Don’t miss the comments below the video. Now, Flores himself tried to play a Devil’s Advocate (sic!) and gave 10 possible reasons:
She forgot to take it off – not likely though, seems this is a prominently displayed piece there for a reason, which is our real question
It’s the Cross of St. Peter – they claim to be Catholic after all, and this cross is said to be used historically this way, upside down. However, this is far from its contemporary usage or how audiences would react. And looking at all the circumstantial evidence, this claim will be used as one form of ‘plausible deniability’. The vast majority of Catholics, and we mean vast, would never think to wear this cross, for obvious reasons. But why go out of one’s way to create such a problematic confusion when your husband just had to have a Microsoft ad pulled because of the public’s reaction to Satanic witch, Marina Abramovic being featured in it? There’s more history to this though, pointing in another direction. The earliest reference from modern usage comes from Eugène Vintras.
Vintras was a French Gnostic revivalist from the around the middle of the 19th century (1807–1875). He preached the end of the world, and claimed he had received messages from the Archangel Michael and that he himself was a reincarnation of Elijah. Vintras was condemned by the Vatican, and after his condemnation he started using an upside down cross. The mention of this being satanic comes from Éliphas Lévi (an occultist himself) stating that Vintras’ inverted cross was “indicative of satanic influences“.
Most condemning is how Gates’ colleague Marina Abramovic explains symbols themselves: it is not the symbol used, but its intention. Intention, or rather will, is everything. And half the words out of Melinda Gates mouth are lies, meant to harm, enslave, cause pain, suffering, illness and oppression. That is how we know that this is not the Cross of St. Peter, but the anti-Christ cross of Satan. Just as holy water becomes holy when God knows it is to be used for something holy, any symbol, no matter how righteous its intention and use by many others, becomes an evil symbol used to wield evil powers when used by a person who is doing evil. It is really that simple, and final. This is why it is not the Cross of St. Peter.
She wants to tell us that she’s also a Satanic witch of some kind. Why should Hillary Clinton and Marina Abramovic get all the fame and scare all the children?
About scaring children, causing fear seems to be part of their belief system. We don’t even have to get into materialist/literal questions about adrenochrome, we know that as a belief system causing fear and ‘feeding the demons’ by creating more fear-based emotions in the world, is what demons live on.
They really want to troll half the American population hard, to cause more divisiveness. That would lead to articles like this being published. So let’s cut against that – If you look at the things she’s actually saying, half of it is not only not objectionable, it’s actually quite good. The scam part is not only the other half that’s fatal, but that if they were really serious about the decent half, they with all their money and power could have effected those changes already (legislation to support mothers, paid medical leave, etc.)
A big part of that trolling would be to cause hate against her, another emotion that feeds them. I know it’s a trick, that’s why we need militant love. Radical love. We should pity them and their souls, anger and hate only feeds their team. That doesn’t mean we don’t defend ourselves by any means necessary. But if attacked, we take aim and fire with thoughts of humility, pity, forgiveness, and love.
The public reaction makes her a victim – we saw how the NYT covered the public response to Abramovic. No one concerned about her connection to pizzagate and ritualized cannibalism was interviewed, it was Abramovic the victim. Is it Melinda Gates’ turn to be the victim? Will this be more ‘online hate from white supremacist nazi Trump supporters? Is this more ‘basket of deplorables’ provocation?
Also on divisiveness, this is about being so public about it that it causes secular liberals, those naive empiricists, those extreme Popperian positivists, to act like no single fact can ever be connected to other facts and extenuating circumstances. They will then mock the reaction from people whose eyes and hearts are a tad more open, or whose memories work, or who understand how to process information. That ridicule is also intended to divide, and lead towards a cycle of divide and conquer.
Because their Satanic belief system demands they be increasingly public about who they are and their aims. Contrary to popular belief, evil is a weak force in the world. There is more evil right now than at any other time because the satanists have been working to manifest and conjure it for some time. Children have been taught the ‘evil’ version of history, focusing on wars instead of the long periods of relative peace over centuries and centuries.
They need to normalize their satanism. Yes it starts with wanting us to think that the way things are, are how they’ve always been, we just now have more technology. This is part of their lie. Evil is such a weak force in the world that the primary effort of social media, mainstream journalism, pollutants and toxins in our air, food, water and medicines is to dumb us down, make us docile, sick, dependent and stuck in the matrix of their tyranny. The capitalist, consumerist marketing is 24 hours a day, it’s vibrating through the air. That’s how much effort it requires for evil to have an advantage. And yet we are still fighting it. That’s how weak evil is.
Can you do a better job defending this act?
Let’s go to another Flores’ question. On May 1st 2020, the 116th Convocation of the U.S. Congress at its 2nd session, has introduced a new bill, with the acronym TRACE:
While Americans are distracted with the mainstream media’s coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress still plugs ahead, creating legislation that they feel is critical during this health crisis. One of these proposed laws is H.R. 6666 COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone Act with the clever acronym of the TRACE Act (and let’s not forget the rather fascinating 6666 numbering). Please note that all text for the bill has not yet been released.
Two days earlier, Dr. Michael Ryan, Executive Director of the World Health Organization’s Health Emergency Program during the March 30, 2020 daily press briefing by the World Health Organization,
We have to put this paragraph in text:
“In some senses, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units. Now we need to go and look in families and to find those people who may be sick and remove them, and isolate them, in a safe and dignified manner.”
Since we do not have a complete text of the future Act, we may just guess what could be the interpretation of the text in the Section 2:
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, may award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts.”
Too wide, or intentionally written so it can be interpreted as a possibility of taking children from American families (should an adult test positive), through Child Protective Custody (CPS). And all of that under the House Resolution number 6666. That must be a coincidence. That was the next number in the line, right?
Unfortunately, not even Russia is spared from the censorship on the ‘coincidence questions’. On April 19th, Orthodox Easter Holiday, Rossiya 24 TV channel had a plan to air a new issue of ‘Besogon TV’, with the famous Oscar-winning film director Nikita Mikhalkov. The episode was dubbed ‘In whose pocket the state is?’ and should be aired 8 times, since Russia is a great country with 11 time zones. Instead, after two airings, it was quietly taken down from its schedule. Mikhalkov has taken this for an act of “censorship.” Why was it done?
Well, in that episode, Nikita Mikhalkov dared to ask some questions that implicate German Gref, the head of Russia’s state-owned bank Sberbank, a known proponent of the digitalization of society, and – Bill Gates. He dared to ask a following question:
“The 060606 part is somewhat alarming. You probably understand this, right? Is this a coincidence or an intentional selection of such a symbol, which in the Apocalypse of John is called the ‘number of the beast’ – the 666?”
Even more scandalous – at the “Russia Today” we have witnessed a vile attack on Mikhalkov in the text titled “‘Bill Gates seeks to microchip humanity!’ Russian Oscar-winning director pushes vaccine conspiracy… loosely-based on REAL patent” – which was not signed! You can see it on Hive as well.
In that text – which BTW was not signed – there were some statements I had to respond in the comments. I have to repeat them with the quotes from the unknown author, so you can follow this line easier:
* * *
It is interesting to see a text on RT without signature. That’s strange. Who wrote this one?
The director’s theory falls short of explaining how that system would solve the overpopulation problem, though
There is no ‘overpopulation problem’, that is the narrative disseminated by the corporate media with the obvious intention of justifying elimination of ‘unproductive population’.
Mikhalkov’s conclusions might be quite far-fetched, and the patent WO/2020/060606 is not directly linked to Gates, who has technically stepped down from Microsoft’s board to focus on running his and his wife’s Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Gates stepped down from Microsoft’s board by the beginning of this year, and the filing date of this patent is – 20 June 2019 (20.06.2019). That patent is not made in a day. Or without the knowledge of its boss. So, is it far-fetched?
Neither does it mention microchipping, instead describing “sensors” coupled with a “device” to register the body activity. One alleged purpose of such a technology described is to encourage healthy lifestyle with users awarded cryptocurrency for exercising.
Now here I have to simple questions for the mysterious author of this text:
- Did he/she really expected monstrous idea openly revealed in the patent? Seriously?
- ‘“sensors” coupled with a “device” to register the body activity…’ What is the difference? It does not describe precisely a method of implementation?
Here is a link to a text full of links at Gates’ interviews, and his pages where he describes his intentions: A vaccine against coronavirus or biological software? Let the author see him talking and writing about everything, and then explain to everybody how Nikita Mihalkov is a ‘conspiracy theorist’.
And those who fear being forcefully microchipped by an evil corporation, should probably first check their own pockets for a little “tracking device” called a smartphone, which they had purchased and carry around voluntarily.
Keyword is ‘voluntarily’. Bill Gates is talking about removing this voluntarism and make a vaccination with his vaccine mandatory. Did the author miss his interview? .
The last question to the author: Is it easier to accuse Russian Oscar-winning director as a ‘conspiracy theorist’ for stating the obvious, than it is to admit Bill Gates is a soulless monopolist whose openly revealed intentions are to control the World trough his ‘philanthropic’ work?
* * *
And then, Mikhalkov was – completely out of context – in a comment of RT correspondent Murad Gazdiev, ‘involved’ into 5G conspiracy theory…
…despite the fact that Nikita Mikhalkov never mentioned 5G in his show! Sorry that I don’t have English subtitles, but even with a generated subtitles you can see that 5G is not even mentioned:
I am in the group of people who knows that 5G radiation is less dangerous than 4G, and that far greater danger from a 5G technology lies in its ability to trace everyone in its range IN REAL TIME. How’s that for a totalitarian state? Oh, BTW, that state is feeding you so much GMO, chemicals in the food, poisons in ‘soft’ drinks, alcohol, tobacco, and prescribed drugs – which are going to kill you much faster than any electromagnetic radiation from 1G to 5G ever could.
Nikita Mikhalkov has proven himself as an artist and philosopher who has in every of his works searched for the truth and freedom. Banning him from publicaly posing a serious question, is a very good indicator of the freedom in a society.
At the very end I have a pair of questions: What’s wrong? Are there no other numbers or symbols except a satanic ones, for their ‘philanthropic’ ideas?
How many ‘coincidences’ does it take to make a ‘conspiracy theory’ a viable practice?
* * *
Related posts / Повезани текстови:
Check out ABRA and easily invest in 28 cryptocurrencies or BIT10, an index of the top cryptos. Use this link to sign up and get $25 in free bitcoin after your first Bank/Amex deposit, or 1.5% cash back when you exchange cryptos