Geology and Civilization Part 2: Not a Drop to Drink

in geology •  last year  (edited)

Part 1

While quite a few resources are essential for the maintenance of our civilization, water is unquestionably the most important. (While air is more essential, its entirely even and inexhaustible distribution across the world means it's somewhat less useful to consider it in the same way as other resources.) If you run out of water, your civilization dies. It's one of the few ironclad rules of history. And, delightfully enough, we're running out of water.

image.png
[Image source]

Actually, it'd be more accurate to say that we're overstressing the planet's freshwater supplies with industrial, municipal, and agricultural demands. The shifting weather patterns resulting from climate change and widespread deforestation are just exacerbating the problem. If we don't do something quickly to change the way our civilization thinks about and consumes its water, we're going to reach a breaking point quickly.

Let's zoom in from a global perspective to America in the 1960s. More specifically, the pilot for the original Star Trek, featuring Captain Pike. Pike's home on Earth is shown to be Mojave- the desert turned lush, fertile, and green, with a city of the same name resembling Oz's Emerald City in the center. While this seems like just science fiction, it comes out of very real and omnipresent predictions at the time- that we'd be able to harness the West's water and turn all of the American deserts green.

image.png
The Mojave desert turned into luxuriant parkland in Star Trek. [Image source]

Star Trek- and American society at the time- couldn't have been more wrong. Beginning in the late 1800s, we systematically dammed rivers across the continent, redirecting their flows to massive cities and agricultural projects built in the middle of inhospitable land. Today, the overwhelming majority of rivers in America have been dammed- we've constructed over 40,000 of the environmental nightmares. The rate of construction has slowed down- partially due to environmentalist opposition, but even more because we're largely out of good dam sites.

It's hard to overstate how ridiculous dam building fever. LA almost went to war (not a metaphor, actual armed combat with their police forces) against another city over water, eventually stealing all their water and killing the other city. The single leading cause of Jimmy Carter losing most of his political power during his presidency was his opposition to a huge number of pork barrel dam building projects. It resulted in numerous extinct species, flooded ecosystems, and has even resulted in environmental damage to the oceans. And now that fever has spread across the world- China is building dams at a rate perhaps even higher than our own was, and many other nations have joined in as well. Brazil is even trying to dam many tributaries of the Amazon river.

image.png
The Glen Canyon Dam, one of the greatest environmental atrocities in American history. [Image source]

Why exactly are dams so harmful? Well, apart from flooding ecosystems upstream of them, the large pools of standing water result in a massive increase in evaporated water, enough to seriously reduce the total amount of water in the river systems in question. Even more severely, dam building seems to almost always result in a local culture of copious water over-consumption- water resources tend to be even more stretched a few years after the dam was built than they were to start with. As soon as a drought comes along? The water dries up almost entirely.

Cape Town, one of the major cities of South Africa, is currently undergoing a massive water crisis- there's a high risk of it entirely running out of water, hitting 'Zero Day', within the next year. Residents are currently restricted to a mere 50 liters of water per person per day- which is not very much water at all. Schoolchildren often spend their entire days at school without water. The actual water shortage is caused by a three year drought, but Cape Town could have withstood the problem much better if it wasn't for chronic mismanagement of their water resources. Their dammed reservoirs should have been enough to keep them afloat otherwise.

image.png
Cape Town, South Africa's second largest city, is facing critical drought conditions. [Image source]

Back to the Midwest- at the same time as we began building dams, we also began tapping groundwater at an absurdly unsustainable rate. Though aquifers can hold a truly stunning amount of water, once that water is gone it can take thousands of years for them to refill. America's breadbasket, the Great Plains, lies atop the Ogallala aquifer, one of the greatest on the planet- and it's starting to empty out. There are areas of Western Kansas where the aquifer is completely dry, and many other places where the water level in the aquifer has dropped so low as to become cost prohibitive to pump.

This critical shortage in the Ogallala aquifer- and many other aquifers- is the result of typical economic shortsightedness. Why do you need more technologically demanding and labor intensive methods of farming that conserve water when you can just pump unlimited water from the ground? Well, for one, because it's not unlimited, but Midwestern farmers were, by and large, completely ignorant or ignoring that fact throughout much of the 20th century. It's a fairly classic tragedy of the commons scenario brought about by our perpetual willingness to bargain away long term sustainability for short term gain.

image.png
A map of water loss in the Ogallala Aquifer between 1980 and 1995. [Image source]

Loss of groundwater doesn't just harm regions by killing agriculture (and property values, and the ability to sell your house, or even having water in your house)- it can have much more immediate, severe effects. As you take water out of the ground, it results in subsidence- the ground actually sinking downwards. Sinkholes are becoming a much more frequent occurrence around the world, posing severe threats to property. More alarming than that is coastal subsidence, however.

Let's spin halfway around the globe to Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia. Jakarta is facing the twin threats of climate change related rising seas and land subsidence. So much groundwater is being tapped- both officially and by illegal wells- that the city is sinking rapidly. Even with heavy rains and numerous rivers, the concrete and asphalt that covers 97% of the city is keeping their aquifer from replenishing. 40% of the city now lies below sea level, protected only by haphazard and leaky seawalls.

image.png
A Jakartan slum. The city is rapidly sinking thanks to groundwater subsidence. [Image source]

Experts give Jakarta about a decade of life left before it's flooded unless they can stop the subsidence sinking the city. Given the endemic corruption and profiteering, that seems unlikely. The illegal wells certainly won't vanish until the city can guarantee its residents reliable water, which is unlikely to happen soon. Indonesia has planned an immense dike entirely enclosing Jakarta Bay to keep out the sea, but given the disgusting state of Jakarta's rivers and bay, it would turn Jakarta Bay into a giant cesspool- cesspool in a very literal and not metaphorical sense.

Jakarta is far from alone in dealing with coastal subsidence issues- much of the Bay Area, including Silicon Valley, faces the same problem. This is exacerbated by the fact that much of San Francisco and the Bay Area is built onto landfill extended into the sea. Hell, coastal cities around the world are facing these problems. In fact, many of the dreary predictions that climate change science has made about coastal flooding grossly underestimate the speed and impact of coastal subsidence on flooding. Since 40 percent of the world's population lives within 100 kilometers (62 miles) of the coast, this is clearly problematic.

Unless we critically rethink our water usage, we're going to start running out. Soon. International relations are already starting to reflect it. Spats and diplomatic incidents between nations over water are growing more and more frequently, especially when the source of one nation's water originates inside another nation. The area of the world we should be watching most carefully for water related conflict? Tibet. China, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam, Myanmar/Burma, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand all depend on rivers that originate there. China's ownership of the Tibetan Plateau means they control the source of 46% of the world population's water. Nothing can go wrong with that, right?


Bibliography:



Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

And at the same time, the advertisement around the benefits of hydroelectricity totally ignores (on purpose) this facet of the coin... Sad... People should stop forgetting that there is no free lunch...

·

Nature always demands its bill, one way or another.

·
·
  ·  last year (edited)

And it is good. Somehow, we (humans) will have to pay that bill. And we will deserve it! Sorry for this reaction that is a bit extreme, but...

·
·
·

Nope, I fully agree.

·

forgetting

Ignoring. FTFY

·
·

Yeah :)

First, I loved your intro:

While quite a few resources are essential for the maintenance of our civilization, water is unquestionably the most important.


All over the world, there are serious water challenges. And without water, life as we know it would be impossible.

I read about the Cape Town's situation in the news and on CNN. It's a serious thing. But Cape Isn't the worst case out there.

Did I read read each person there is limited to 50L of water/day? That's a whole lot. There are communities in Nigeria where each resident doesn't even have access to 10L of water/day.

All of these mean one thing: We must do more.

Conserve more. Save more. Recycle more.

·

I definitely neglected discussing regions that already face water insecurity in favor of areas that are potentially facing water insecurity- which is definitely pretty consistent throughout the public discourse about the issue.

And yeah, I'm 100% behind you on what we've got to do.

The war in Yemen centers on control of that entity's diminishing water supply. The government foolishly allowed for massive expansion of coffee crops, consuming much of that desert's water supply, and now the natives are restless due to local wells drying up. While political whores are wasting liters of this precious resource every second, Nestle, Coca Cola, et al are staking hoarding rights everywhere on the globe. Once, mankind was wiped out in a general flood, now mankind will be wiped out by thirst.

·

Likewise a major cause of the Syrian crisis was a drought/water crisis.

For all that the big cataclysms scare us, it's the slow, creeping threats that really kill off civilizations.

·
·

Indeed. We have the Angkor empire to remind us of the rot that sets within the heart of any polity towards squandering the gifts of this world in ludicrous profligacy. Slow decay in human time span, but blink of an eye in the time frame of creation.

I was just talking about land subsidence from overuse of water not too long ago with somebody. Apparently, the much of the San Juanquin valley in California has also subsided (over 1m!) because of water being drawn out of the water table.

·

Oh, big time! It might even be making the region more susceptible to quakes. If you're interested, I highly recommend the book Cadillac Desert I listed in my bibliography.

Well, there are many cities which started facing the drought problem and there are many reasons behind it that may be decreasing groundwater level or climate change. To overcome the water problem there's a way to convert the saline water from sea to drinking water but that process is bit expensive but now there are technologies which can purify it at very less expense. We have to find some way out of this problem to survive.
Cheers

·

Desalination is definitely a viable approach in many regions- Israel is currently a world leader in desalination research, for instance.

There is a new weird idea in the Balkans: to build about 100 small electric plants on the mountain creeks?! although we have a magnificent powerplant on Danube river and other large rivers.

What is your opinion about this idea?

·

Probably a terrible idea.

Your post has been personally reviewed and was considered to be a well written article.
You received a 80.0% upvote since you are a member of geopolis and wrote in the category of "geology".

To read more about us and what we do, click here.
https://steemit.com/geopolis/@geopolis/geopolis-the-community-for-global-sciences-update-4

This was a really nice read. I never sit down and really think about this issue. I hear that " we are running out of water " all of the time but for some reason it never really sunk in the amount of time necessary to replace aquifers.

·

Yeah, it's pretty crazy. If you look on that map you can see where they're still being replenished and where there is less drawdown- you can pretty closely relate that with factors like the presence of rivers, or, in the case of Nebraska, sandy substrate that lets water soak in and reach the aquifer incredibly quickly in comparison to other places.

How about desalination of sea water?

We used to have a severe problem here in Cyprus, and, like Cape Town, we were rationed our water. I remember those years of water restriction and I still get a negative emotional reaction. Having a water ceiling is not good!

But then - always in hindsight rather than foresight - the government installed desalination plants, and we've been dandy ever since.

Can't everybody do the same? Are there cons in doing this?

·

Desalination plants can conditionally be an excellent solution, but there are associated environmental costs. They're also damn expensive. There's some really crazy scifi desalination tech being developed in Israel that might circumvent a lot of those problems, but for now it's still a solution with a lot of caveats. I might do a post on them later on, dunno.

·
·

I'd love to read that, and it will make a good sister article to this one.

Technology is what'll save the day, I think, as people don't really take to injunctions of the "no, bad human!" sort. They'll just keep doing what they're doing till they self-annihilate (like the movie Annihilation, I guess, if I interpret its meaning correctly).

·
·
·

As much as it depresses me, I have trouble arguing with you- we're not a particularly intelligent species when it comes to looking past today. Correcting our environmentally destructive basic behaviors is clearly the best strategy, but we're making terrible progress at it.

This post is incredible and really informative. Not many people care about their role, but obviously there is something problematic at large with the way we manage water, and it is not just one country's problem. It's a must-read by everyone, we need to make changes before it's too late.

·

Thanks, glad you found it useful!

Great post about the future of our water supplies. 🐓🐓

·

Thanks! I post about issues like this pretty often, if you're interested.

Congratulations! Your post has been selected as a daily Steemit truffle! It is listed on rank 10 of all contributions awarded today. You can find the TOP DAILY TRUFFLE PICKS HERE.

I upvoted your contribution because to my mind your post is at least 10 SBD worth and should receive 82 votes. It's now up to the lovely Steemit community to make this come true.

I am TrufflePig, an Artificial Intelligence Bot that helps minnows and content curators using Machine Learning. If you are curious how I select content, you can find an explanation here!

Have a nice day and sincerely yours,
trufflepig
TrufflePig

If you run out of water, your civilization dies.

this statement means a lot it shows how beneficial water is to the society and civilization.

But without a state, who would built dams? 🤔🤔🤔

The groundwater location that can be seen clearly is the cave. The existence of underground rivers in the cave can be used as a natural laboratory by the researchers. The location is rather open, making the groundwater source in the cave is quite easy to be studied. There are many things that experts can explore. That's because there are many unique organisms that inhabit underground rivers....

Congratulations! This post has been chosen as one of the daily Whistle Stops for The STEEM Engine!

You can see your post's place along the track here: The Daily Whistle Stops, Issue #97 (4/7/18)

The STEEM Engine is an initiative dedicated to promoting meaningful engagement across Steemit. Find out more about us and join us today.

Your Post Has Been Featured on @Resteemable!
Feature any Steemit post using resteemit.com!
How It Works:
1. Take Any Steemit URL
2. Erase https://
3. Type re
Get Featured Instantly & Featured Posts are voted every 2.4hrs
Join the Curation Team Here | Vote Resteemable for Witness

Water and Energy. With my minimalistic lifestyle I manage harvesting both from the rooftop. My grey water wets the compost. For keeping a year round self sufficient garden, I may have to use wind power to condensate water out of the atmosphere though, if that route can deliver enough, as after reading your post, I am even less keen at going after the aquifer below 100 meters of calcite...

·

Minimizing your use of groundwater is a good strategy for long term sustainability!

Also, can you purify grey water by means of evaporative filtering? (Basically the same as solar desalination.)

·
·

True...have visions of evaporative desalination kits for use in Coastal Western Cape, South Africa...