9/11 - The Only Post You Need to Read - 50 Questions They Can't Answer

50 Questions That No-One Can Answer!

This is Not a 9/11 Conspiracy Theory - it's Game, Set & Match!

Truth Fears No Investigation – Let’s Investigate!

---

Preface

I am not going to ram my personal opinion/belief on the events surrounding 9/11 down your throat. I am going to present 50 Very Reasonable, Logical and Scientific Questions that ALL of us should be demanding answers to.

I searched the blockchain prior to writing this post (I honestly didn't want to write a post on 9/11 as I have was working on some other stories) but in searching the blockchain I soon realised that no-one had (yet) comprehensively addressed the key-points surrounding the events of 9/11 in a single post.

I think that it is safe to say that each of us awoke after experiencing our very own unique and personal aha moment at some point in time. We may have researched many other topics in the lead-up to our aha moment, but there can only be one aha moment (not dissimilar to your first kiss), for me it was 9/11.

I believe that the steemit blockchain is here to stay, and if it here to stay then steemit needs credible and unique content and that simply has to include a comprehensive post on 9/11 - so with that aim in mind, and in an attempt to spread truth, and play my role in trying to wake people up, I chose to write this post about 9/11 - and now that I have posted it - I respectfully request that you read it, watch it, evaluate it, question it, share it and support it.

If you know someone that still believes, or is satisfied with the Official NIST/Gov't Story - or isn't sure what happened on 9/11 - they need to read this post!

---

I have Provided the Full and Un-Edited Video Further Down the Page – For Now Please Enjoy the Trailer and Keep Reading!

Official Trailer - September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor - 50 Questions They Can't Answer

---

Popular Mechanics Magazine - Self Proclaimed Debunking of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories back in 2010

---

NIST (US Gov't / Official Story - 2005) - Final Report on 9/11

Final - Like End of Story?

Whoa, Whoa - Not So Fast - We Will Decide When It Is Final - Not You!

---

September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor

Massimo Mazzucco has created a 5 hour, 3 part, 9/11 Masterpiece of a documentary called September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor. - everyone needs to see this film. Massimo Mazzucco has released it free of charge so that everyone can view and share it. I have re-uploaded the film (in 3 parts) and re-named it 9/11 - 50 Questions They Can't Answer (whilst giving all credit back to Massimo Mazzucco).

Massimo has produced a number of other documentaries which you can view for free on his website.

---

9/11 - 50 Questions They Can't Answer (i.e. September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor)

This documentary is unique because it avoids falling into the trap of discussing some of the more controversial theories that have been raised by 9/11 truth-seekers and sticks to the evidence that NIST & Popular Mechanics provided in their own reports. The film then proceeds to ask 50 very reasonable questions, that the NIST Report (Official Gov't Story) and Popular Mechanics Magazine avoid, (and continue to avoid).

This film (in my mind at least) proves that the official story doesn’t stack up, and why the self-proclaimed debunkers have failed to make a credible case against the so-called conspiracy theorists. NIST, Popular Mechanics and your Gov't now has 50 questions to answer yet it is highly improbable that they will ever be able to credibly answer the vast majority of them (because they can't).

To use a tennis analogy - the ball is now in their court and I think Massimo has hit a winner!

---

Pearl Harbor & 9/11 - Introduction

Massimo Mazzucco starts out by listing 12 things that Pearl Harbor and 9/11 have in common. Then it quickly switches gears and begins to forensically examine the data that NIST and Popular Mechanics provided.

---

Part One - Air Defense, Black Boxes and Hijackers

Mazzucco covers the non-existent air defense systems of NORAD and the USAF, the parallel military drills, the non-existent military interception, reaction, intervention, as well as the 'Cheney stand-down orders' that took place on 9/11. Mazzucco also covers the hijackers, their backgrounds, their inability to fly 2-seater Cessna's (let alone commercial airliners), as well as the 'missing' black boxes and the total lack of any credible evidence to support the claim that the 'alleged' hijackers even boarded the planes.

Question: In relation to the dialogue between Cheney and the young man at The Pentagon on the morning of 9/11 - can you suggest anything other than a direct stand-down order from Cheney?

Question: The Secret Service knew of the incoming planes for at least 30 minutes prior to them hitting their targets (they were tracking them on radar), and had the capability to shoot them down - but they didn't shoot them down. Why?

---

Part Two - Pentagon, Shanksville (UA93), Silverstein, NIST and WTC Intro

Mazzucco asks questions relating to the lack of video surveillance at the Pentagon on 9/11. I mean seriously, the Pentagon has hundreds of CCTV cameras covering every inch of the perimeter of the building yet we only ever seen footage from one-angle and it has been doctored. The Pentagon also has missile defense systems that can shoot down approaching planes or missiles but they didn't work either?

Shanksville (UA93) - where is the wreckage?

Question: The Shanksville (UA93) plane reportedly crashed into the ground, intact - can you explain why debris was found 6-8 miles from the crash site on a day with little wind?

Question: How could the terrorists be preparing to take control of the plane at 9:45am when they had supposedly already been in the cockpit for 15+ minutes?

Question: Can you explain why the Shanksville (UA93) plane was buried deep underground in a hole that somehow closed in on itself?

Question: WTC - Can you produce evidence that the temperatures in the Twin Towers were high enough, for long enough, to weaken the steel trusses?

Question: WTC - Can you produce evidence that the fireproofing that insulated the steel trusses were dislodged by the planes, especially seeing that NIST has made it a necessary condition for the collapse of the twin towers?

Question: Pentagon - According to the Pentagon Building Performance Report, the aircraft disintegrated before it had travelled a distance that approximately equalled its length, and that it is highly improbable that any significant portion of the aircraft could have retained its structural integrity at this point in time - can you explain what caused the almost perfectly round exit hole in the outer wall of the C-Ring at The Pentagon seeing that the plane had already disintegrated?

---

Part Three - WTC Towers and WTC Building 7 Free-fall Collapse

Mazzucco looks closely at the WTC towers and WTC Building 7.

Question: WTC - Can you explain why over than 100 eye-witnesses (mostly fire-fighters and policemen) all reported hearing and/or seeing explosions at the WTC?

Question: WTC - Can you explain the huge explosion in the basement of the North Tower before the plane hit?

Question: WTC - Can you explain what caused the huge explosion that destroyed the lobby of the North Tower 1 hour after the plane hit?

Question: Building 7 (the smoking gun) - Can you explain what caused the huge explosion, as reported by Barry Jennings and Michael Hess on the 8th floor of Building 7 - before the twin towers had even collapsed?

Question: Can you explain what caused the numerous explosions that were televised by CNN and the BBC after the twin towers had already collapsed, and before the collapse of Building 7?

Question: WTC - Can you explain the cause of the squibs that we all saw below the level of collapse (between the 30th and 40th floors)?

Question: WTC - Can you explain how large sections of debris literally flew into the air and landed a significant distance away from the towers when the upper sections of the towers did not have the required energy to propel them upwards and outwards?

---

The Documentary (in 3 Parts) including Time-Stamps (for easy referencing)

---

Part One - 9/11 - 50 Questions They Can't Answer

INTRODUCTION

0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

AIR DEFENSE

0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

THE HIJACKERS

0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

THE AIRPLANES

1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cell phone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

Part Two - 9/11 - 50 Questions They Can't Answer

THE PENTAGON

0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

FLIGHT 93

0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field
0.37.20 - The shoot down hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

THE TWIN TOWERS

0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation 1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation 2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and free-fall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

Part Three - 9/11 - 50 Questions They Can't Answer

THE TWIN TOWERS (Continued)

0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete
0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

BUILDING 7

1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 – Pre-knowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Free-fall

EPILOGUE

1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word

---

Closing Thoughts on the Film

Following are a few of the very interesting points that Massimo Mazzucco raises in the film:

• NIST claimed that the collapse of Building 7 is based on data that remains classified and therefore cannot be independently verified.
• NIST models are inconsistent with the visual records of the collapse of Building 7.
• NIST's own data shows that the fires, that supposedly led to the collapse of Building 7, had for the most part burned out over an hour before Building 7 collapsed.
• No steel-framed building in history has ever collapsed due to fire, yet 3 steel-framed buildings collapsed on the same day - and one of them (Building 7) wasn't even hit by a plane.
• The first-time phenomena of steel-framed buildings collapsing due to fires, as claimed by NIST has not resulted in any regulatory changes relating to how steel-framed buildings should be constructed post- 9/11.
• The hat trusses that sit at the very top of each tower was not found in the rubble - even though there was nothing above them that could have crushed them - it seems that they simply disintegrated.
• By 9:03 a.m. the US Gov't knew that two aircraft had already flown into the twin towers and that two others were hijacked - yet no effort was made to recall the fighter jets that were being used (diverted) in exercises/drills on that day.
• Molten steel was still present 3 months after 9/11 and there is clear evidence of molten concrete - and that requires temperatures that cannot be explained by office fires.
• The damage to the Pentagon could not have been made by a 757, and the plane could not have been flown into the Pentagon by a pilot. Even Top-Gun pilots and many commercial pilots are the the on-record as saying - we could not have flown those manoeuvres, let alone a guy that could not fly a 2-seater Cessna.

---

Bonus Facts (not in the film):

• The Twin Towers were powered down on 9/11 - for the first time in 30 years.
• The elevators were undergoing renovations in the weeks leading-up to 9/11.
• Bomb sniffing dogs were removed in the lead-up to 9/11.
• Heavy equipment was moved on to empty floors of the twin towers in the lead-up to 9/11.

---

Benjamin Netanyahu (1996) - A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the "Clean Break" report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel. The report explained a new approach to solving Israel's security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on "Western values." It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting its possession of "weapons of mass destruction".

---

1 Year Later (1997) - Project for the New American Century

Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy. The passage suggested that the transformation of American armed forces through "new technologies and operational concepts" was likely to be a long one, "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.

---

8th President of Italy - Francesco Cossiga - CIA & Mossad Did 9/11

In 2007, Cossiga wrote (referring to the 2001 September 11 attacks): "all democratic circles in America and of Europe, especially those of the Italian centre-left, now know that the disastrous attack was planned and realized by the American CIA and Mossad with the help of the Zionist world, to place the blame on Arab countries and to persuade the Western powers to intervene in Iraq and Afghanistan".

In the same statement, Cossiga claimed that a video tape circulated by Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda and containing threats against Silvio Berlusconi was "produced in the studios of Mediaset in Milan" and forwarded to the "Islamist Al-Jazeera television network." The purpose of that video tape (which was actually an audio tape) was to raise "a wave of solidarity to Berlusconi" who was, at the time, facing political difficulties.

---

General Wesley Clarke - 4-Star US General, Supreme Allied Commander of NATO Forces said USA Planned to Invade 7 Countries Weeks after 9/11.

---

DUSTIFICATION of WTC on 9/11 - From Steel to Dust

I am yet to fully research 'dustification' but this video is worth watching so am I am including it so that you can do your own research into 'dustification' if you wish. This is Part 5 of Dr. Judy Wood's seminar into 9/11.

---

9/11 - Were We Pre-Progammed About 9/11 Decades in Advance?

---

If You Seek Truth You Have Found a Home - Join Me on a Journey of Discovery - I Haven't Even Begun to Warm-Up!

Follow Me - No Topic is Too Big, Controversial or Off-Limits!

Yours in Truth

@steemtruth

---

If this Post Resonated with You Please Considering Following Me and Sharing!

All Comments, Upvotes and Follow's are Greatly Appreciated - They will Allow Me to Keep Sharing Truth with You!

Visit My Blog to Read Earlier Posts.

---

Related Posts:

Education and Indoctrination - Is There a Difference?

Henry Kissinger's War Crimes, Body Count & Nobel Peace Prize - Truth Revealed!

Controlled Opposition - Your Friend Might Be Your Enemy

What do Einstein, Pink Floyd, Noam Chomsky and the Trilateral Commission have in Common?

---

Sources:

Massimo Mazzucco: September 11 - A New Pearl Harbor - CONSIDER DONATING

Benjamin Netanyahu - A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

Project for the New American Century

Francesco Cossiga - Italian President - Wikipedia

Popular Mechanics 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Final Reports from the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation

9/11 Film Reaches Beyond the Choir

---

Images:1 2 3 4 5