RE: 9/11 - The Only Post You Need to Read - 50 Questions They Can't Answer
Good stuff. I'll have to check out that documentary.
I'm still trying to think of what the most convincing evidence would be to a non-believer. What do you start with?
It seems to me that the squibs a dozen or more floors below the collapse is a dead give away. It simply cannot be explained without explosives.
I also think that the Government 9/11 report clearly misrepresents the eyewitnesses who heard explosions. It seems like obvious deception when they say only a few firefighters hear the explosion. Many many videos exist of people on that day testifying of explosions, as you well know.
Question: WTC - Can you explain why over than 100 eye-witnesses (mostly fire-fighters and policemen) all reported hearing and/or seeing explosions at the WTC?
Comparing the 9/11 Commission report with the footage should open anyone to the possibility that the government is lying about all of this. Do you think this is the best evidence? Or the tower 7 free fall perhaps? The squibs? I'd like to know your opinion.
Two of the best pieces of evidence from this video are:
Cell phone calls that were made from 30,000 feet in the air that did not drop for 30 minutes (back in 2001).
Plane that hit the pentagon flew close to 500 knots near ground level as it did a virtually impossible banking manoeuvre. The plane would have broken up. Even Boeing admit that the plane could not handle those speeds. Navy and commercial airline pilots state that they could not have flown that manoeuvre - let alone a guy that could not fly a 2-seat Cessna.
This video is without question the 9/11 video that I have seen. I strongly recommend that you watch it and share it with others.