Controlled Opposition - Your Friend Might Be Your Enemy - TruthsteemCreated with Sketch.

in life •  last year

The Best Way to Control the Opposition is to Lead it Ourselves ~ Vladimir Lenin

Lenin Controlled Opposition.jpg

Truth Fears No Investigation – Let’s Investigate!


Controlled Opposition - What Is it?

Controlled Opposition is a Protest Movement, Opposing or Dissenting Voice that is actually being led and controlled by the Government.

Throughout history almost all Governments have used this technique to trick, subdue and divert attention away from the actual opposition - aided and abetted by the same complicit mainstream media that funded the political campaign of the elected official whilst also managing and controlling his/her public perception - wake up!

It's primary goals are to dominate, lead and control the 'opposing narrative' and divert the publics attention away from the facts i.e. it is not opposition in any way, shape or form - it is manufactured opposition designed to look like real/true opposition.

The deeper that you dive down the rabbit hole the closer you will be to realising that you have been programmed since birth - it's a very harsh reality, but it is true!


COINTELPRO - COunter INTELigence PROgram

FBI COINTELPRO.png

COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert, and at times illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations.

Wikipedia COINTELPRO.png

Insights into Controlled Opposition

  • If a good number of people know it - they most likely want them want to know it.
  • They talk a lot of truth - if they didn't they would be easily identified.
  • They never tell the whole truth and there are some recurring topics that they will never touch - that is the easiest way to identify them.
  • The more awake that you are the easier it is to recognize one of them. It is an on-going process of awakening.

Morpheus.jpg

Examples of Controlled Opposition

I am going to go out on a limb here as some, or many of the names on this list are going to suprise, and challenge some people - nonetheless please allow me to add some context. I encourage you to do further research and to keep asking questions.

AgentReasons and Areas to Research
Communism & StalinWho funded Marx? Who was behind the Bolshevik Revolution? What groups did Stalin target and kill? What group did Stalin not touch? The West always needs a bogey-man and a threat. Once it was Communism, today it is terrorists of any kind.
China & MaoCommunism was funded by the West (see 1). Mao Zedong got his start as editor of the Yale China Association Student magazine re-focusing it on 'thought reorientation,' and operated a bookshop out of its medical college. (source: Wikipedia)
Al-Qaeda & ISISAl-Qaeda was created by the CIA to fight a US proxy war against the USSR in Afghanistan. The program went underground (black) after the war ended. ISIS is essentially Al-Qaeda re-branded.
Wikileaks & Assange"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." What about the Bilderberg conference? "That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their meeting notes." - Julian Assange, Belfast Telegraph (source below). Assange doesn't talk about western state sponsored terror and while he has talked about banks he hasn't attacked the central banks, BIS or World Bank.
Edward SnowdenHe told us that the NSA spies us - didn't we already know this? Snowden doesn't talk about, or release documents on western state sponsored terror, illegal wars and occupations, torture, 9/11 or even a corrupt politican or banker - if he did have top-level clearance he should have been able to find some evidence. The US Gov't even allowed his pole-dancing fiance to fly to Russia and marry him.
Donald TrumpConsistently and intentionally self-sabotages his presidential campaign so as to pave the way for Hillary Clinton to win office - and she will win office and there isn't anything that we can do it seems.
Bernie SandersHis campaign was sabotaged by the DNC and manipulated by the super delegates and Bernie didn't speak up about it and demand change. He played his role becasue his job was simply to ensure that Hillary won the nomination. He was also used to open up the debate about socialism which is where the US and world is headed (see point 1 about Communism).
Alex JonesAlex talks a lot of truth and he has woken a lot of people up but there are topics that he won't touch that I am not prepared to go into at this stage other than to suggest that you research who Stalin didn't target and kill (point 1). Alex often loses it, watch his rant with Piers Morgan on CNN. These rants are intended to make him come across as crazy and he saved it for CNN so that the masses that saw it will more easily dismiss him as a looney.
ALL Mainstream Media and HollywoodThey all spread lies, there is no such this as true investigative journalism. 90% of US citizens get their news from 6 media companies. Hollywood movies pre-program the masses.
Musicians, Actors & CelebritiesResearch Aleister Crowley and the role that the Illuminati and Occult plays in music and movies etc.
RT NewsRT lobbies for cultural Marxist progression, UN Agenda 21 and global warming propaganda. Larry King now works for RT after working for many years with CNN. Max Keiser also comes across as a little crazy at times, just like Alex Jones does. Watch the video below of Max Keiser doing an interview with Alex Jones in a car (under sources).
Almost All Alternative MediaRussell Brand, Jesse Ventura etcPaid actors and clowns. I can't even be bothered wasting energy on them, it's so obvious.
Almost All Alternative MediaThe bigger and more popular the alternative media organisation is the more it is controlled opposition. They speak a lot of truth but once again, there are some topics that just won't touch.

And so many more - most of we are told is a Big, Fat Fabricated Lie!


Don't Believe Me? I Encourage You to Do Your Own Research!

Communism by the Backdoor (Part 1 of 21) - Watch the Full Series


Hillary Clinton Admits that the US Gov't Created Al-Qaeda = Controlled Opposition


Obama Admits that the US Gov't Trained & Funded ISIL/ISIS = Controlled Opposition


Edward Snowden = Controlled Opposition


The Gov't Wants Us to Rise-up and Wake-Up - That Gives Them a Reason & Cause to Take Our Guns Away and Implement Martial Law - You Know This Because They Want You To Know It and They are Using their Controlled Opposition Agents to Do It!

john_f_hylan_international_bankers_real_menace.jpg


Woodrow Wilson Admits Passing Control Over To Bankers

Woodrow Wilson Unhappy Bankers.jpg


Elections - What Elections?

vladimir_lenin_about_the_oppressed controlled op.jpg


The Matrix

We literally live in the Matrix and most us of will live our entire lives never having realised it.

George Carlin American Dream.jpg


George Bush Admits that the US Gov't Creates the News That You See


CIA Media Control Program - Gov't Has Always Been Making the News


If You Seek Truth You Have Found a Home - Join Me on a Journey of Discovery!

I understand that I am pushing the boundaries with this post (this is possibly far too much information for some people to take) - but that does not mean that the information that I am (and will continue) to share is not true.

Very few people will ever share this information with you (I will) - many of those that claim to be Freedom Fighters and Truth Seekers are Controlled Opposition, DisInformation Agents & Paid Liars.

I challenge you to find fault in any of my research - I Aim to Only Share Truth - No Matter How Uncomfortable It May Be to Hear It!

It's Not all Bad News - I Intend to Share Solutions in Future Posts

Stick With Me - No Topic is Too Big, Controvsial or Off-Limits!

Yours in Truth, Peace, Love and Knowledge

@steemtruth


If this Post Resonated with You Please Considering Sharing!

All Comments, Upvotes and Follow's are Greatly Appreciated - They will Allow Me to Keep Sharing Truth with You!

Visit My Blog to Read Earlier Posts.


Related Posts:

Education and Indoctrination - Is There a Difference?

Henry Kissinger's War Crimes, Body Count & Nobel Peace Prize - Truth Revealed!

What do Einstein, Pink Floyd, Noam Chomsky and the Trilateral Commission have in Common?


Images: 1 2 3


Sources:

Assange - Belfast Telegraph 7/19/2010

Max Keiser & Alex Jones - Car Interview

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  trending

I felt this was related so, here is the Music Video I made for the Chris Geo Song "C.O.I.N.T.EL.P.R.O" :

·

that's a nice addition to the article and a really good video.

I've updated the post with some fresh content. Thanks for your contribution.

Russia being communist was propaganda all the way.... they were state capitalist and just pretended otherwise.

·

True - it's all an illusion.

·

Capitalism is used to build the armies and infrastructures for Communism to exist - this is why they've always been hand and hand. Once Those infrastructures and armies are built then it becomes Communism.

·
·

No capitalism is needed, prior infrastructure helps any system. Armies are not needed either, with no state you will have no army.

Hello, Your post does resonate with me and touches upon one of the most interesting questions regarding opposition - how can we know who is authentic freedom fighter and who is just a distractive puppet? And... is there any certain way of proving that one isn't? How would you yourself convince your audience that you are not an agent?

·

You've asked some great questions.

how can we know who is authentic freedom fighter and who is just a distractive puppet?

I gave some tips on how to identify an agent in the 'Insights' part of the post and if you take a look at my 'Reasons' in the 'Table of Agents' section that I compiled it should give you even more tips. Look at my comments on Stalin and Snowden for example. There is some subject matter that it taboo and I am yet to see a controlled opposition correctly identify and address them. They all defend the party line or at best avoiding these topics.

It is not always easy to spot them but the more awake and aware that one becomes the sooner that one can recognise them, it's a journey and it takes time. You are waiting for them to trip themselves up and therefore expose themselves. There are names that I considered including in the table as I have my suspicions but seeing that I am not sure I felt it was only fair not to include them. I am however keeping an eye on some of them to see if they slip up.

Stefan Molyneux, David Icke and Joe Rogan are names that I should have included in hindsight.

is there any certain way of proving that one isn't? How would you yourself convince your audience that you are not an agent?

If they have a large following and are still alive, talking openly and not in jail that is usually a good sign that they are agents but that alone is not proof enough.

I would encourage you to watch the 'Communism by the Back Door' video contained within my post. Some of the topics within these videos (each one is 15m long so you can work through them at your leisure) are the topics that an agent will not talk about.

I am not prepared to be any more specific at this stage (not enough people are sufficiently awake to receive the message but fortunately they are increasingly becoming so). But, I have pointed you in the right direction and a controlled agent would never do that.

In saying that, everyone should remain vigilant and sober and arrive at their own conclusions. Time tends to sift the agents from the truthers and if I haven't yet convinced you that I am not an agent then maybe I will in time.

I will add, and this is very important - don't trust what I am saying and don't trust anyone else. Not because I am lying or an agent but you should always do your own research and and arrive at your own conclusions - it's sound advise. I can make mistakes and while I am very confident that I have a lot of the answers it would be very arrogant and naive of me to think that have all of them and I don't profess to.

I know of people that have been tapped on the shoulder and told to quieten down, or else. Most people will quieten down and others will be recruited to become the next agent.

If I go silent I might have been tapped. I'd rather go silent than become an agent.

I have a question for you - how can I be sure that you are not a Gov't employee that is merely attempting to profile me?

·
·

Thank you for taking time to write very informative response. By the way, Steemit lacks critical functionality that is notification about responses...

So, the trust issue. It is something I've been thinking about since went on-line ages ago - entryism, subversion, provocation, astroturfing, etc, they are real things. Then I read two very interesting books about infiltration, one was about UK undercover police and the other about US trying to get Hells Angels jailed... There was a documentary movie about the latter too. What I found disturbing was that in both cases the infiltrators were the most active and extreme people, who wanted their targets to do something criminal, so they could be charged, and in both cases their targets were coerced into doing something they would not do otherwise. So, if there is an organization, say, anarchist, and someone joins in and proposes blowing some stuff up, most likely the person is an agent. Understanding that was kind of illuminating...

So, healthy dose of mutual distrust is certainly required, especially if consequences of actions taken together can be... undesired.

And, last but not least, there is no way I can convince you that I'm not an agent, and to be honest it is generally impossible, or at least that's how I see it - someone who is a sleeping agent can do a great job at pretending to be real opposition for years, until... he reveals himself. Or not. Or maybe just a fraction of time the agent spends on working is dedicated to harming the real opposition... There are endless possibilities. The only thing that I am sure of is I am not an agent, but it's not enough :) Aaand...

...there is one more thing. An agent is not necessarily someone who was recruited and formally trained. There are agents of influence and even unconscious agents of influence, who serve wrong purpose because of beliefs, Stalin's useful idiots. And someone who is a real opposition, genuine freedom fighter, but refuses to believe, for example, in chemtrails issue? I mean, is there a limit to conspiracy? We established that people can't be trusted generally, how about theories and ideas? How do we know what is and what isn't a false flag operation? Look at that flat earth thing, at first I thought it's not possible for someone to believe in it (flat earth, XXI century, come on!), and then I felt enlightened, because... if I wanted to find really crazy people, who will devote endless energy to most ridiculous theory, I would definitely want to give them something crazy to pursue, because they are dangerous and who knows what they will find if they are allowed to find their own goals. That's how I imagine partially awakened people are managed by the powers that be.

You see where I'm going with this? :) And my introductory post is still waiting to be written. What is above deserves to be described more formally and in a separate post I think... And there is at least one possible solution to all of this. Possibly...

·
·
·

Look at that flat earth thing, at first I thought it's not possible for someone to believe in it (flat earth, XXI century, come on!), and then I felt enlightened, because... if I wanted to find really crazy people, who will devote endless energy to most ridiculous theory, I would definitely want to give them something crazy to pursue, because they are dangerous and who knows what they will find if they are allowed to find their own goals.

You cut me deep brah.

·
·
·

Thank you for your detailed reply macius.

Steemit lacks critical functionality that is notification about responses

True , we have to check the replies tab on our blog pages at this stage.

in both cases the infiltrators were the most active and extreme people, who wanted their targets to do something criminal

The most militant elements of many organizations are typically the agents. The state wants to enslave the masses (literally), so they manufacture false flag, and real events with the goal of disarming the civil population and initiating martial law - then they can do whatever they want.

There are agents of influence and even unconscious agents of influence, who serve wrong purpose because of beliefs, Stalin's useful idiots.

Agreed.

How do we know what is and what isn't a false flag operation?

By looking closely at the evidence but that takes times. There are people out there that are dedicated to this task which can speed up the research process immeasurably. It always easy to spot them but I feel that I've developed quite a keen eye over the years and I intend to write about some them in a future post.

Look at that flat earth thing.

Flat Earth Society is controlled opposition. They present cases that can easily be debunked.

What makes you so certain that the earth isn't flat?

I am not a flat-earther - but before I totally dismiss any theory I would need to do a lot of research into that topic - nothing would surprise me anymore. I have some major sticking points with flat-earth theory (which is why I'm not a flat-earther) but I also have some major sticking points with NASA, Gov't lies and scientific fraud. I haven't tried to find the answers because at this stage I'm not that interested in the topic, but maybe one day I will be.

Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and walked on the moon...The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened. I said sure, I saw it on television. He disagreed; he said that he didn't believe it for a minute, that 'them television fellers' could make things look real that weren't. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn't ahead of his time - Bill Clinton in his 2004 autobiography, My Life

You've added value to this post, thank you.

·
·
·
·

I have some major sticking points with flat-earth theory

I'm curious to know what those are...

·
·
·
·
·

the main one I have is the long distance flights between e.g. Australia to South America. I've heard the argument that they don't actually fly but I've seen evidence to suggest that they do. Without taking the flight myself, or a friend taking it, or doing a lot more research I'm not sure how to answer that one?

Come to think of it I could ask around as I'm a traveller and so are many of my friends.

If you can shed some light into that I'd appreciate it.

·
·
·
·
·
·

First, I'd like to show respect for your thinking, steemtruth. There aren't many around like you. Some others of note are; Miles W Mathis, but he's not interested in questions about "God", because he "doesn't know anything about him." G Edward Griffin, but he's friends with Alex Jones, so there may be some intel connection there. I worked as a pilot, and flying instructor, for about 20 years, and I'm pretty damn sure flat earth is as you say - a psyop intended to disinform, divert attention, and discredit those who fall for it. Miles gave me that insight, and many of the tools I now use to research, deduce, and induce, effectively. Just looking at all heavenly bodies, which are spheres, it would be hard to conceive that the earth is different. The moon, on the other hand, could be different, but I don't know enough to be certain. I'm not sure where you're heading with this, so I'll simply ask why? Why would such great lengths be gone to, in order for us to experience this present reality? On a slightly different note, I'm finding this very hard to type atm, because my computer is very sluggish, with long delays, and screen whiteouts. Obviously, my computer is being monitored, or something because it does the same on Facebook.

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

I'm not sure where you're heading with this, so I'll simply ask why? Why would such great lengths be gone to, in order for us to experience this present reality?

That's a very big question. I'll be happy to discuss this with you on Discord.

Thank you for reading my blog and adding value to the discussion.

·
·
·
·
·

@steemtruth .. I can't reply to your comment due to max depth of 6 nesting, so I will post it here.

Not sure what you mean about the Australia to South America planes "not flying" but something that may help explain the topography of the earth is the following news article. It talks about an emergency landing in ALASKA by an airplane going from Taiwan to Los Angeles. This would make a lot of sense if the world is shaped accordingly to the map on the flag of the United Nations.

Also, I am well aware of John Todd, William Cooper and many other whistleblowers like the late Phil Scheider. Donald Marshall blows all of them out the water. Phil Schneider is second best.

Just looked at your page and I'm following you.

·
·
·
·

"What makes you so certain that the earth isn't flat?" Well. Two weeks ago on some nice beach I was watching ships go below horizon, slowly disappearing, as if the earth was really not flat :)
Also, I've a certain threshold of willingness to believe in theories. Body of knowledge I accumulated over years (and I'm not a teenager anymore, sadly) allows for certain... variations, so to speak. What I can see and understand with my limited brain power is my "logical base", and for example the content of your post - I can see, understand and agree with truth contained within it. You tell it how it is :) Then there are the reptilians, fake moon landing, flat earth and other interesting theories that I cannot prove to be false, but they are either not compatible with my view of the world (I'm happy to change it if evidence is strong enough), or I dismiss them with Occam's razor, or I don't really care if they are true or false because there is no way I could do anything about them. Politicians are lying pieces of... fertilizer and it doesn't make much difference if they are human or not. Not now anyway. And time spent on uncovering evidence of them being from Mars I would consider wasted and I would strongly suspect that it is to someone's advantage, that there are more useful things I could be doing to free humanity instead. In other words: fiat currency is false regardless of the shape of the earth.

·
·
·
·
·

Well. Two weeks ago on some nice beach I was watching ships go below horizon, slowly disappearing, as if the earth was really not flat

That is an illusion caused by light refracting. Bust out a telescope and you'll see your ship fully intact.

·
·
·
·
·

It seems to me that we have a fair bit in common. I can't prove that the earth is flat, or spherical, based on the evidence that I have seen, or the research that I have conducted and it's not that important to me right now either, so I believe that both possibilities are possible.

The long-distance flights is a question mark for me.

I have a friend that is a surveyor, but we don't catch up that often but next time that I do I intend to ask him about curvature allowance.

We are aligned on reptilians and moon-landings.

I made a very conscience decision some time ago to only take a pro or anti position when I was more than sure and it had to be based on evidence, reason, logic and critical thinking. When I say evidence, I am not talking about the highly questionable evidence that science rams down out throat. I think that we both know that there are a lot of lies, and at best theories in science.

If I don't have enough evidence (or haven't researched the topic deeply enough) then I chose to sit on the fence, as I do with FE.

·
·

Stefan Molyneux, David Icke and Joe Rogan are names that I should have included in hindsight.

I agree with you wholeheartedly! I would've been fooled by Joe Rogan and David Icke if whistleblower Donald Marshall had not ousted them. I even tried to convince Andreas Antonopolous on Twitter multiple times, when he was going to attend the JRE show, that Joe Rogan is a disinfo stooge. He got annoyed with me reminding him and ended up unfollowing me.

·
·
·

I hadn't heard of Donald Marshall before but he isn't the first Illuminati insider to blow the whistle. In saying that I have not researched his content. John Todd is one that springs to mind.

While they weren't Illuminati men like William Cooper and John Coleman did some great research.

Just looked at your page and I'm following you.

Well done article! So glad people are awake and on it when it comes to this stuff. I've upvoted and followed you. Keep it up!

·

Thank you for commenting, upvoting and following.

This post is brilliant. While some controlled opposition is pretty obvious, like Alex Jones, I have to admit I only just really woke up to Wikileaks very recently.

The one that really perplexed me is David Icke, because over 80% of what he says is bang on true, but he manages to make himself look like a nutter by spouting on about reptilians all the time. And even though he is now even doing presentations with Alex Jones about reptilians, it only just went click.... http://ageoftruth.dk/david-icke/

Meanwhile, for consistent accurate information I always rely on James Corbett - https://www.corbettreport.com/

·

Ah yes, that's another thing that looks suspicious, although I can't decide whether it's a proof of guilt or not - the first time I heard about him (David Icke) was something like "that crazy reptilian hunter". It was only much later when I actually listened to the guy and was surprised by how much sense he does make. But the reptilian thing? The three extremes are a) it is really the truth (I don't believe it), b) it is something he believes to be true, c) he is an agent and doing the trick of associating the 80% of truth with reptilians, making the truth unbelievable or ridiculous by association. I choose option B in this case, but it's my personal opinion :) Actually, one more thing to add is that options B and C can be simultaneously true, and he's using planted evidence without being aware of it.

·

Thanks for the kind comment sift666.

I'm with on James as I've been following him for a good while now and he has certainly contributed to my awakening on a number of topics. I did read somewhere recently where someone accused him of being CO but I can't recall the details which means that it mustn't have been very convincing. To be clear, I am not saying that James is, he hasn't given me any reason to believe so - he's one of the best out there but in saying that we should always remain vigilant.

·
·

I've been following James for more than five years now and used to email him with q's before he became bigtime - I really am convinced he knows his stuff. One of the people he has exposed is Noam Chompsky.

·
·
·

I didn't know that he had exposed Chomsky but I'm glad to hear that he he did. That's another name that I should have had on my list.

I now recall why Corbett was called out as controlled opposition and after taking a closer look it's hard to argue that he isn't. Look at this 1st video and watch them all skirt around the elephant in the room (the people pulling the strings) while they all lay blame at the USA and Soros.

View it on you tube and read the comments section if you aren't sure who they are avoiding/protecting.

In this 2nd video James again blames the US, ISIS and Soros for beheading a 12 year old boy. Problem is that I don't see the boy being beheaded but James (in this video, and Sibel in the 1st video) want us to believe that it is. It may look like a beheading but look closely at it - movies are more realistic and gruesome than what we see in this video.

Once you've seen enough of these fake terror attacks and fake killings the same pattern emerges e.g. camera pans away at critical moment, and/or grainy footage, and or granulation of the head so that we never actually see anything.

Try to find convincing raw footage of anyone getting killed by anyone, anytime this year or last. I've been unable to find it and I've looked pretty hard, maybe you will have more luck. Please let me know if you find something.

Faking a beheading is easy. Even Infowars ran a story on it.

Even these amateurs at home can do it - where you see the camera cut away you simply replace it with a mannequin of a 12 year old boy on the back of a truck who's head has been granulated out.

Before anyone accuses me of dishonoring the murder a young boy let me make it clear that I am not. If was murdered that is a tragedy. My point is that if we are to look at the evidence alone it is not enough proof (for me at least) that he was beheaded. Importantly, do not view these videos in isolation, go back and research all of beheadings, killings, terrorist attacks, police shootings over the last few years and you see the same patterns emerging in all of them.

I am yet to see one convincing video, but that doesn't mean that there isn't one (or a few) scattered amongst the dozens of clearly unconvincing ones that I have seen. Don't let your eyes (and mind) deceive you and don't let slick 'alternative media' distract you.

Good list of State Actors. Sounds about right. Respect.