Weekly overview of the development category - Week 43, 2018
2018-10-19 15:42:05 UTC to 2018-10-26 15:42:05 UTCThis is a weekly, semi-automated post where I will show some statistics and graphs of the development category. It will also serve as a showcase for the staff picks and task requests that were made in the current week. If you have any suggestions or things you'd like to see in this post, then please let me know!
Category summary
- There were 34 contributions of which 31 were, or will be, rewarded.
- The average score was 63.3 with an average reward of 39.6 STU from Utopian.
- The total reward from Utopian for development contributions this week (so far) is 316.5 STU.
- There were a total of 25 unique contributors in the category.
Score distribution in the development category
Average score, reward (STU) and time before review (hours) per week
Time before review is the number of hours between the creation of the post and the time it is reviewed by a moderator.
The average score of contributions has gone up from 58.1 to 63.3 this week, which is a good indication that the quality of contributions has also gone up! Despite the average score going up, the average reward has unfortunately gone down from 55.5 STU to 39.6 STU. Finally, the number of hours it takes for us to get to a contribution and review it (on average) has gone down a lot from 20.0 to 14.0.
Number of contributions reviewed per week
As you can see the weekly number of reviews has stayed the same this week (32)! The number of reviews these last two weeks have been a bit less than usual, and so this means that the number of contributions over the last two weeks (64) are also down compared to the number of reviews in the two weeks prior to that (93).
Contributors
Number of unique contributors per week
With the number of reviews going up this week, it's pretty surprising to see the number of unique contributors down slightly from 31 to 25.
Most contribution(s)
@steem-plus
@miniature-tiger
@sambillingham
@holger80
- steemmonsters, a new command line tool for battling opponents with your cards
- python steemmonsters 0.0.13 released - several improvements
@magicmonk
- Steemit Account Creation History - A new SteemFriends feature requested by @teamsteem!
- SteemFriends.org New Feature - Distinguish between Written/Voted Articles from Main Panel/Navbar, Excluding Comments checkbox
Moderators
- @amosbastian reviewed 5 contributions with an average score of 59.25.
- @codingdefined reviewed 14 contributions with an average score of 58.0.
- @emrebeyler reviewed 13 contributions with an average score of 62.7.
- @helo reviewed 1 contribution with an average score of 64.0.
Amount of contributions reviewed per moderator
Average score given per moderator
Task request(s)
[Development Task-Request ] Help build knacksteem front-end. (800 Steem bounty!) by @knowledges
@knowledges is looking for React developers and has created a task request with multiple tasks that each have their own bounty - for a total of 800 STEEM! If you are interested in bringing Knacksteem - a project that aims to reward creative talents and abilities of individuals on the blockchain - to life, then go check it out!
- React
Also, if you think there is anything that can be worded more clearly, then please let me know!
Congratulations! Your post has been selected as a daily Steemit truffle! It is listed on rank 8 of all contributions awarded today. You can find the TOP DAILY TRUFFLE PICKS HERE.
I upvoted your contribution because to my mind your post is at least 12 SBD worth and should receive 75 votes. It's now up to the lovely Steemit community to make this come true.
I am
TrufflePig, an Artificial Intelligence Bot that helps minnows and content curators using Machine Learning. If you are curious how I select content, you can find an explanation here!Have a nice day and sincerely yours,
TrufflePigThis post has been upvoted for free by @millibot with 0.1%!
Get better upvotes by bidding on me.
More profits? 100% Payout! Delegate some SteemPower to @millibot: 1 SP, 5 SP, 10 SP, custom amount
You like to bet and win 20x your bid? Have a look at @gtw and this description!
Hi, @amosbastian!
You just got a 0.35% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
Although the graphs are full of valuable information, it looks like there are some errors in displaying your data.
However, one can see that the numbers are different in the last two weeks and the number does not correspond to the y-axis. Perhaps you omitted some items.
You mention several times that there were 25 unique contributors. Though, the bar crossed the value of 25 in your graph. Unfortunately, it appears that the comparison with previous week is inaccurately displayed as well.
The summary of the data shows that you (amosbastian) reviewed 5 contributions. Yet, the graph has a value of 2. Furthermore, codingdefined's and emrebeyler's numbers are different in the text and the chart too.
The idea of these posts is great, and it has been missing for a long time. Though, try to verify the numbers in graphs and text so that they are not different.
Hi @amosbastian!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your post is eligible for our upvote, thanks to our collaboration with @utopian-io!
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Congratulations @amosbastian! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click here to view your Board of Honor
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last post from @steemitboard: