Determination or Genius? What Does it TAKE to Succeed as a Writer?

in #writing6 years ago

"What do I have to DO, to get anywhere with this?" is a question I've heard quite often from wannabe bloggers and writers, over the years.

As I look back over 40-odd years of writing somewhat "seriously," I also remember asking a similar question myself, when I was in college; I was taking creative writing courses.

"Quality Matters!"

Here on Steemit, a lot of people talk about "quality content" and so forth, and that discussion also exists — in variations — outside the Steemitsphere. 

Sunset
Fiery sunset

But what exactly do we mean by "quality?"

One of the things that became very clear to me — even 40 years ago — is that whereas it is nice to have some degree of talent and/or brilliance as a wordsmith, talent alone is seldom the deciding factor in whether or not someone becomes successful.

I remember one of my college creative writing professors inviting everyone in the class (as a tongue-in-cheek assignment) to take a trip to the nearest bookstore and see for ourselves just how many (or "few," as it were) books in print were actually of anything that even remotely resembled "literature quality."

His estimate — as a published author — was "less than 1%."

Not What We Want to Hear!

When you consider yourself a somewhat decent writer, it can be a little disheartening to be told that your skills — in what you might consider your "craft" — don't really matter all that much.

Flowers
Colorful flower garden

But I have run into that firsthand, years back, trying to sell articles to magazines as a freelancer... and being told that my pieces were "wonderful" but needed to be revised to "a 10th grade level" or something similar. OUT go any complex or esoteric words; IN come their simpler replacements.

Unhappymaking, when you've worked hard on a piece and think you created something good?

You bet!

Which brings us back to the whole issue of "quality content," and how we define it.

If you look around at the vast majority of blogs around the web, even the most popular ones out there are far from high quality, from a writing perspective. 

Connecting With Your Audience

Once we get past the initial idea that we have to be really good writers, the secondary definition of quality content is that it has an authentic "voice" and it connects with your target audience. 

Dandelion
Even weeds can be pretty

And this is where knowing "who you are" and what message you have to impart becomes essential.

From that perspective, we have many "quality content creators" here on Steemit. I won't list them by name because that's kinda spammy, but they are they ones you tend to return to, over and over, simply because their content is interesting.

They are the ones that pretty much make you forget whether or not their posts were "published for rewards," and you'll often notice that some of their posts are really well rewarded and some earn almost nothing... which is surprisingly often a hallmark of content created from a place of authenticity, rather than "to sell" or to "be popular.

There are exceptions, of course. There always are!

Consistency and Perseverance

There really are no magic "success pills" for bloggers and other writers. The biggest favor you can do yourself — once you're comfortable with your "voice" as a writer — is to be determined and consistent... and keep plugging away at it.

Honeysuckle
Honeysuckle

In this context, I will mention a couple of favorite Steemians, because they are excellent examples: @whatsup, who has written TWO recent posts — "They Laughed When We Said... $3 dollar Steem" and "I made 95 posts that didn't earn a thing" epitomize what it takes to succeed not only on Steemit, but in writing. The other example is @arbitrarykitten whose post "The Truth About Writing Time" underscores the importance of taking time to write every single day. 

I chose these two as examples because they are seasoned community members with thousands of posts to their credit; not "another newbie trying to cash in on giving advice to newbies."

I'll wrap it up by adding this: Focus on YOUR writing, and stop worrying about what others are doing. And stop getting butthurt every time someone else earned better rewards than you for an inferior post. Those are the breaks; move on and keep writing!

How about YOU? My first question would be whether or not you're "trying to succeed as a writer/blogger" here on Steemit? Or are you just "dabbling" in this, for fun? Are you consciously trying to use Steemit to build "Brand You?" Or are you "just here for the money?" What does "succeeding" LOOK like, to you — as a writer; as a social content creator? What determines success? Will you know success when it arrives — or do you already have it? Leave a comment-- share your experiences-- be part of the conversation!


created by @zord189

(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly for Steemit)
Created at 180503 15:49 PDT

Sort:  

Loved it! Thank you for the shoutout, but I think you would have received a full vote even without the mention.
I can handle many things, but the recent whining and focus on others is making me crazy!

Nice one denmarkguy!

Thanks for the support, and the extra boost!

I am sick to death of all the whining, as well... and I think it has its roots in a lot of misguided promotion of Steemit as a (sort of) "get rich quick scheme." Which it is not, and was never intending to be, as best I can decipher.

Most of my railing is against the "short term mindset." The finger pointing is getting a little tedious, too.

Very tedious! :) Cheers to you, I'm trying to keep myself out of the battle. :)

I used to use the words "quality content", but realized it's too vague. What I mean by "quality content" is QUALITY KNOWLEDGE or INFORMATION. The "quality writing" isn't much of a concern for me that much. The info, knowledge, being of a quality of importance in life, is what matters.

Agreed!

"Quality" is an amalgam of many things. As you suggest, there has to be a "takeaway" of some value. The best recipe ever for vegetarian curry has value. A new psychological insight has value. A great instructional on some topic has value. "Quality" is added if these also have a high level of usability; they read easily and intuitively.

Beyond that, I expect a certain amount of originality and insight. That's one of my issues with memes getting paid huge rewards... yes, a funny meme may have "value" (as a quick laugh) but I can only give it "quality" if it was your own idea and YOU created it. The 46th recycling of the exact same meme from the web has little value. At least to me. Lacks any kind of originality, and "involvement" by the poster.

Memes are very low on the quality spectrum, with little lasting value and usability. Steem has many issues, still, they seem to increase not decrease lol :P

the market is ALWAYS right.

A well informed market is always right.

the invisible hand.

Determination.

Being a genius doesn’t mean you’ll never fail, people like Stephen hawking, Einstein, Jordon, Ali are geniuses in their own realm, however they have coupled themselves with determination to reach where they are today.

Having both is definitely a plus. Genius tends to result in quantum leaps forward... people go "oh wow," and then they head back to the safety of their own mediocrity. A lot of success tends to come from taking things we already know and use, and making relatively minor improvements... that make all the difference.

Exactly, building upon what we already know. That's how the world we know it today was formed.

First off, 40 years of 'somewhat serious' writing is a pretty big accomplishment, regardless of the earnings. Just continuing to stick with it is amazing.

Second off, thanks for running through the tips. There is more to Steemit than just 'the money' and there is actually long term rewards and satisfaction in 'building the brand.'

Most people who are only here for the rewards and not for the eyes on their content or engagement with others probably shouldn't be blogging. They should find another niche to work in, or maybe even wait a while until some other industry appears. Not everyone is going to do well with writing or creating, but that doesn't mean there won't be opportunities with other things. Even getting good at curation and commenting is better than going nowhere posting until you can build that audience and hone that craft.

I agree with the consistency and perseverance part. Do you sometimes go through a phase when you feel that your writing is not good enough?

The crucial element is who you are writing for. I really don't think it makes a (decisive) difference whether a non-fictional book is written by a Kafka-like talent or just somebody who really knows how to cook/garden/lifecoach or whatever you are looking for. The difference between good and not so good is not the elegance of the wording, but the results derived from the book.

Real literary talent (or other artsy ones like taking photos) is only necessary in the sharply defined niche of fiction or art in general. There, you need talent to succeed and often artists don't even succeed if they have plenty of talent. But if you don't have talent at all, you won't go there in the first place - or leave it after trying and realizing you're not the one.

That's why: I really don't think the density of artistic talent is 1% or even less, on the contrary it must be quite high. At least over time, mediocrity is always filtered out. I agree on that with @everittdmickey. The market fixes that problem. This even counts for cheap throw away products of the popular culture. Those may be corporate artists, but they still have to bring a lot of talent and self-discipline to make it in the business.

Or are you just "dabbling" in this, for fun?

Aren't most users doing just that??

This post has received a 2.87 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @whatsup.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.15
TRX 0.12
JST 0.025
BTC 55011.75
ETH 2337.88
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.34