WikiLeaks Falsely Tied to Russian GRC and Hacking in Mueller Report

in #wikileaks5 years ago (edited)

The Mueller report proved something. It's not that there was evidence that Russia, Russian intelligence agents or Russian hackers passed emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign to WikiLeaks. Nor that Trump colluded in some imagined conspiracy with Russia to influence the elections. They do prove that the whole thing was a witch hunt that willfully ignored evidence and analysis that contradicted the false narrative the FBI and deep state was trying to weave.


Source

Take, for example, the forensic tests from the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), a group of former military and intelligence officials. They were the first with prior government backgrounds to question the hacking claims about how the DNC emails were obtained. Their conclusion was that the emails were leaked, not hacked.

Did the Mueller report mention this fact? No. They didn't bother to address it or debunk it. Instead the report stated the ananlysis can;t rule out the emails were hacked.

"The Office cannot rule out that stolen documents were transferred to WikiLeaks through intermediaries, who visited during the summer of 2016. For example, public reporting identified Andrew Müller-Maguhn as a WikiLeaks associate who may have assisted with the transfer of these stolen documents to WikiLeaks."

Müller-Maguhn denies this, as he states "How many of you wouldn’t be scared shitless by the head of the CIA declaring you the next target?" He further says these claims are a "lame attempt" to have the Wau Holland foundation (where he is on the board) get cut off tax-free donations to WikiLeaks in Europe.

The Mueller report even boldly lies to conclude that the emails were transfered to WikiLeaks from the Russian GRU. The reports states in a false "matter-of-fact" way that the GRU and WikiLeaks were in cahoots. And they redacted a portion of text that seems to indicate doubt about there statement of how "clear" the emails were stolen and given to WikiLeaks:

"“Although it is clear that the stolen DNC and Podesta documents were transferred from the GRU to WikiLeaks..."


Source

Assange was also willing to explain in greater detail and "provide technical evidence and discussion regarding who did not engage in the DNC releases". But instead of granting him a limit immunity in a deal with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, Democratic Senator Mark Warner asked Comey to kill the deal.

The Mueller investigation didn't look into questioning the VIPS forensic analysts about their analysis, which includes Bill Binney, former National Security Agency technical director for world geopolitical and military analysis and co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center. In a published memo addressed to Attorney General Bill Barr, VIPS stated:

"We have scrutinized publicly available physical data — the ‘trail’ that every cyber operation leaves behind. And we have had support from highly experienced independent forensic investigators who, like us, have no axes to grind. We can prove that the conventional-wisdom story about Russian-hacking-DNC-emails-for-WikiLeaks is false."

Real investigators, people who know what they are doing, who aren't biased in favor or against WikiLeaks, looked at the evidence honestly, and concluded he allegations set forth by the Mueller investigation were a complete fabrication. Yet, these experts were ignored in the investigation, with no mention of their findings.

This proves how one-sided, willfully ignorant and deceitful the Mueller investigation was from the get-go. They aren't the only liars in this affair. The mainstream media also willfully refused to cover the expert evidence that contradicted the official establishment narrative that tried to pin Trump, WikiLeaks and Russia in a grand conspiracy to rig the U.S. election.

The VIPS groups added:

"Drawing largely on the unique expertise of two VIPS scientists who worked for a combined total of 70 years at the National Security Agency and became Technical Directors there, we have regularly published our findings. But we have been deprived of a hearing in mainstream media — an experience painfully reminiscent of what we had to endure when we exposed the corruption of intelligence before the attack on Iraq 16 years ago."

The VIPS analysis concluded that the files were copied as to serve a leak, and not hacked over the internet:

"We have examined 500 DNC email files stored on the Wikileaks site,” the memo indicated. “All 500 files end in an even number—2, 4, 6, 8 or 0. If those files had been hacked over the Internet, there would be an equal probability of the timestamp ending in an odd number. The random probability that FAT was not used is one chance in two to the 500th power. Thus, these data show that the DNC emails posted by WikiLeaks went through a storage device, like a thumb drive, and were physically moved before Wikileaks posted the emails on the World Wide Web."

The Mueller investigation failed to back up the fraudulent claims of their Russiagate narrative. Yet they won't let it go. They still maintain a hack by Russia to give documents to WikiLeaks.

These agencies make wild claims now, as they have in the past. Such as, Iraq having weapons of mass destruction, and they claims to have the evidence to back up those claims. But, we the public, aren't allowed to read about it, for "national security" or whatever other bullshit reasons. So they cover up their "evidence" by redacting large portions.

Then years later we find out there was nothing there in the first place to merit the gravity of their claims. The Russiagate hype is more of the same.

VIPS member Bill Binney was falsely persecuted by the government in the past, fabrication allegations about him and 3 others being NSA leakers. But they could probe they didn't leak, and the government eventually backed down after years of harassment.

Again, this is what is happening here with WikiLeaks and Assange. The corrupted government officials want someone to be punished, and they are going after the publisher: WikiLeaks and Assange. Instead of looking at evidence, they ignore it in favor of the popularized false narrative that's peddled by powerful governments, intelligence agencies, media and elites around the world. They ignore, dismiss or discard anything that contradicts their fabled narrative.


References:


Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!


Like what I do? Then consider giving me a vote on the Witness page :) Thanks!

My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.


Posted from KURE

Sort:  

That's pretty incredible. I wonder if there is any chance Barr has the will to consider these facts? He and his wife are good friends with Mueller, so I doubt he will call into question the Mueller report. It seems like Fox or 60 Minutes could gain public favor for doing an investigative reporting on this?

Yeah, the favor of some in public, but I don't think to many are in favor of Assange, in public or at FOX...

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

Ways you can help the @informationwar!

  • Upvote this comment or Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP or Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 63956.04
ETH 3066.98
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.31