Sort:  

A magazine article which is 12 years old is one thing. Cool it shows how water molecules can be arranged into nano structures. Neat.

Now you've taken that and made the leap that some PVC device can arrange water in such a way. You made a further leap that an unknown device can "read" such arrangements at a distance without even describing a mechanism by which that could occur. Then there's the further leap that if the water is in such an arrangement it would have health benefits.

It's leap after leap after leap. It's not science. It's probably not true and if it's been in the "research" for 13 or more years where are the studies published in peer reviewed journals linking all of this to health benefits?

If anything you posted was compelling evidence to you you simply don't know how to science.

I don't know how to science... Well said:)

The article you referenced even calls out the fraudulent claims that abound:

"Charlatans have seized on the principles. Stephen Lower, a retired chemistry professor at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, maintains a Web site to catalog claims such as seven-sided water containing "mono-atomic minerals" to "clarify" the nervous system, structured water conducting "healing alpha-theta frequencies," and other quackery.6 Such claims distort what is a far more subtle and theoretical pursuit."

Yes, the article says "Charlatans" are making fraudulent claims about a very preliminary theoretical scientific finding calling it "quackery". You've made my case for me.

I still stand that a magazine article doesn't mean that much. Anyway if these structures occur in nature and are used by our bodies, guess what? Our cells will take unordered masses of water molecules and produce the structures themselves. Brilliant!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 57515.20
ETH 2438.35
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.34