A magazine article which is 12 years old is one thing. Cool it shows how water molecules can be arranged into nano structures. Neat.

Now you've taken that and made the leap that some PVC device can arrange water in such a way. You made a further leap that an unknown device can "read" such arrangements at a distance without even describing a mechanism by which that could occur. Then there's the further leap that if the water is in such an arrangement it would have health benefits.

It's leap after leap after leap. It's not science. It's probably not true and if it's been in the "research" for 13 or more years where are the studies published in peer reviewed journals linking all of this to health benefits?

If anything you posted was compelling evidence to you you simply don't know how to science.