Speak Truth to Create Change
What we say has the power to influence others. We can speak truth in order to create change.
There is a very short text to accompany the infographics for those who want shorter reading, with more in-depth information presented in the video at the bottom.
The word abracadabra means "I create as I say. This means that we honor our word and don't contradict what we say we will do. It also means that we are creating with the power of our voice by creating the truth into someone's environment for them to input and learn from.
We output, speak and project a frequency of vibration that is our voice, and then it reaches someone else as an input that they listen to and receive, that will then affect the frequency of their consciousness.
When we do this, there is an interference between frequencies that creates tension, but is also a catalyst for the possibility of change. Hearing an uncomfortable truth creates an interference in our understanding or worldview, which can be like a friction, tension, pressure or conflict that we must face when contradictory information is presented.
Truth inherently divides from falsity, and this interference and conflict is the friction and pressure for us to change into alignment with the truth in reality, or the truth of a better way. By learning the truth we can align our perception of reality with the actual reality that is demonstrably there. Falsity and errors in our way of thinking or in our behavior are corrected by truth being spoken into creation.
When we hear someone trying to tell us something false as if it was true, whether they are knowingly lying or not, this also creates tension because it contradicts the truth. When truth is spoken against falsity it cuts through falsity to shatter it, but this can also hurt people because they are attached to the falsity. Our sense of self that is based on our self view and worldview can have aspects of falsity that we are attached to and identify with. Truth that strikes that falsity will have us often defend it as if it is part of us, and we can't let go of it.
In speaking truth we create the environment for influence that will lead others towards the polarity of truth. Once someone receives contradictory information that is true compared to their falsity, this interference and disharmony is felt as cognitive dissonance with friction, tension, pressure, conflict, anger and possibly even guilt.
The way to resolve that internal conflict and opposition within from facing hard uncomfortable truths, is either to accept it, or reject it. We can either care for truth more than we care for our attachment to ourselves and our attachment to falsity we falsely identify with, or we can be apathetic to truth and continue to reject it in favor of what's false.
However, if there is no interference in the false frequencies are behaviors, this doesn't create a contrast for people to recognize their mistakes that they don't already see. There is no tension, discomfort and friction that will move them to face themselves and recognize the need to change.
Chaos will continue even if someone isn't realizing how they are creating chaos. The negative that people don't want to face will continue to grow as it manifests through individual or collective actions. Not paying attention to the negative prevents us from learning about the negative and correcting the negative.
We can't correct our errors and mistakes if we don't face them. The feedback between our actions and the consequences to our actions needs to be taken in as part of the information in our environment. Once we recognize the negative consequences to our actions, then we can choose to change.
We don't have to only talk to a wall, to only talk to those who don't even want to hear or listen. The point is to put the truth out there so that it has the potential to enter someone's life, influence them, affect them, and possibly change them for the better. Putting the truth out is what is required to get more people to understand an issue in order for us to change our overall understanding of how to act or live less wrongly.
Video (Longer Explanation ~20m)
Infographic timestamp:
- 1 @ 0m
- 2 @ 6m
- 3 @ 10:40
- 4 @ 12:48
- 5 @ 16:20
Speak Truth to Create Change
Thank you for your time and attention! I appreciate the knowledge reaching more people. Take care. Peace.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider:
Upvoting 
, Sharing 
or Reblogging 
below.
me for more content to come!
Looking to contact me? Find me on Discord or send me a message on SteemKURE.
Please also consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page; or just click on the upvote button if I am in the top 50:
2017-02-28, 5pm
When you don't speak the Truth you create a "false-self" by acting in one way with the mind knowing what should be the "true-self".
As the existentialists say you don't just act with a "false-self", you became that "false-self".
"Language is the house of the truth of Being."
Martin Heidegger
Yup, that's a core part of my main original work: truer self-realization, self-actualization by the removal of the falsity that we attach to our identity as a falser self. We can be and become falser, or we can be and become truer. Thanks for the feedback!
Pride prevents most people from facing the truth. Like you said, they are more worth to themselves than the truth and the effect there of.
Indeed, excellent point!
I'm just curious and I don't want to create confusion, but if two people have a lot of knowledge and speak about truth and false, how can another person know wich one is right and wich one is wrong?
I am sure many here will exemplify exactly how or why it's truth or not if you post a more specific example.
Thus,
Who/What/ is answered by Truth.
Who inherently divides from falsity?
What - - - -?
Where/when is answered by divides from falsity.
Where is truth?
When is truth? Divided from falsity.
Why/how?
How does truth divide from falsity, or why?
Because they are inherently opposite.
What is inherently opposite to falsity? Truth
Who is inherently opposite to truth? Falsity
Can you verify this with inquiry?
Is falsity truth, and is truth falsity?
A grammar of both words, is a prerequisite to forming the questions.
If person A says: 1+1=2 and a person B says: 1+1=3, according to that you don't know the answer, wich person you believe if they both are the best 2 people on the planet at math and why?
First you define what 1 is:
1, a singular unit, the lowest whole number.
Then you define what + is:
The function of addition, the sum.
Then you define what = is:
The function of equality, the quality of being the same
Then you define what 2 is:
The lowest even number.
Then you define what 3 is:
The lowest prime number.
Those are just the basics, of course you would need to define the system they function in and other pertinent respective functions/definitions.
From that you form the questions.
Who/What statement of the two is true: 1+1=2 or 1+1=3?
Evidently once you understand the grammar you can answer the question:
1 added to 1 is the same as 2, the first statement is true.
1 added to 1 is the same as 3, the second statement is false.
You believe nobody on statements of truth, you can validate truth yourself, belief is not a prerequisite to finding truth, a prerequisite is grammar, you need to understand the grammar or the definition/meaning of the terms used and the you can use critical thinking and logic to come to the conclusion.
You can verify and validate truth and you can invalidate falsity with inquiry.
Who, What, Where, When, and Why.
But, what then when you feel that they both are right?
Another question only for you: Why did you get flagged?
I get it thanks a lot for those great explanations and sorry that you get flagged all the way.
Excellent explanation. Speaking truth is an integral part to creating positive change. I might also add that it is necessary to say "NO" when given immoral orders. Disobedience is one of the most powerful actions that can be taken to defeat tyrants. Steem on!
Yes, I was blown away by the fact that it wasn't any ammount of support by the masses that stopped the Vietnam conflict, but only a few deserters/enlisted and a couple officers saying no.
Look it up, its far longer than the 48 minute cut up version they advertise as the actual movie, Sir, No Sir.
There are so many block-heads, who are stuck in the chain of obedience on Steemit. "Code = LAW" to them, it's ridiculous. They can't change... the code says its ok so they stop thinking properly. Thanks for the feedback.
Truth matters. Standing by one's truth no matter what can be a challenge. My wife worked as a profiler with law enforcement many moons ago, and she always asserts that it's almost impossible to discern an untruth told by a sociopath because the sociopath has told themselves that their falsity is "true" so many times it has becometrue, within their frame of reference.
As you have mentioned, here on Steemit, it seems like some are (or have) substituted "the law of code" for independent thinking. It worries me, because it leans towards that toxic paradigm of "human serves machine" rather than the original intention of "machine serves humans." In plain non-intellectualized English: All these damned flagging bots really bug me!
Thank you for continuing to share your insights... hopefully, Steemit can still be turned into a functioning community.
Yeah, watch out what witnesses you vote for, some fall into that brainwashing into AI and machine's are great, let the machines do the voting to reward posts lol
There is literally energy and power in words- this is one reason we must be mindful in what we say and how we say it because that is a means of transferring energy in either a positive or negative fashion. And then there'e the all powerful chant 'uhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm'
And then of course Tesla said......
On an side note to Krnel- originally I had promised and intended to use your generous donation to promote my posts for this event- I've expended about half of your gift promoting posts as well as repelling assaults against Iflagtrash- neither seem to be a very effective use of those precious funds- I'd like to see if you'd be ok with me either converting that to steem to hopefully give the posts a little more weight and make them a little more difficult to be hidden by Iflagtrash attacks or if I could send the remaining $25 back to you and you just make a $25 cash donation to the gofundmecampaign for the demonstration. I'll honor whichever you'd prefer. I spent $10 of that trying to repel the pedofascists attacks today and it didn't do squat unfortunately- please advise.
Do what you want. The promoted page isn't very helpful though, just so you know. It doesn't really affect reaching many people. And the way to get the flagger to not hide the post is if someone like me upvotes it with enough SP. So you can't do anything about it yourself except have more SP.
Roger that- I may just end of leaving this l platform- even if I convert the remaining $25 that won't leave me with enough steem to repel his assaults and frankly I can spend my time and energy spreading my message in forums that don't allow pedofascists to silence truthers- very disappointed that this sort of tyranny would be allowed in the first place. I can't imagine this platform is sustainable unless this sort of one man fascism is addressed and prevented in the future.
I talked to @fyrstikken to see if he can maybe do some bot counter-upvote for the flags. Hang in there a bit more. The flag system is broken indeed. It shouldn't be in the hands of any user, but certain rep# and post count.
Much appreciate it- and I agree- I'll hang in ether a bit longer and see if the powers that be are wise enough to see the flaw in the system and make changes before implosion. Seems like the age old struggle 'absolute power corrupts absolutely'- until the decision makers are willing to relinquish absolute control absolute tyranny will remain.
Don't leave I've upvoted some of your posts to help.
Thanks for sharing. I find philosophy both fascinating and headache inducing, lol - in a sense it is thinking about thinking. I think truth is one of the age old philosophical subjects.
https://twitter.com/Soul_Eater_43/status/836756960598962176
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
Indeed it is. I have done a lot of work on learning how to think and learn, and what truth is. I have shared my understandings on my site and now working on Steemit hehe. Thanks for the feedback and tweet.
You're welcome:)
Es verdad, buena vibra, gracias por compartir.
I agree with your written considerations (can't see the video now) but not with this terminology. I would swap the term truth with viewpoint... There is no Truth. Each individual have his truth. There is no real authority that can tell us what is Truth.
The more complex and distant the topic, the more difficult is to have a viewpoint that can be considered true as shared by most people. I think truth is what people say it's truth.
I completely agree with your writing. The truth should be spoken whatever happen to make things better. However, the fact shows that some people out there still hide to speak the truth and that something bad.