You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Speak Truth to Create Change
When you don't speak the Truth you create a "false-self" by acting in one way with the mind knowing what should be the "true-self".
As the existentialists say you don't just act with a "false-self", you became that "false-self".
"Language is the house of the truth of Being."
Martin Heidegger
Yup, that's a core part of my main original work: truer self-realization, self-actualization by the removal of the falsity that we attach to our identity as a falser self. We can be and become falser, or we can be and become truer. Thanks for the feedback!
Pride prevents most people from facing the truth. Like you said, they are more worth to themselves than the truth and the effect there of.
Indeed, excellent point!
I'm just curious and I don't want to create confusion, but if two people have a lot of knowledge and speak about truth and false, how can another person know wich one is right and wich one is wrong?
I am sure many here will exemplify exactly how or why it's truth or not if you post a more specific example.
Thus,
Who/What/ is answered by Truth.
Who inherently divides from falsity?
What - - - -?
Where/when is answered by divides from falsity.
Where is truth?
When is truth? Divided from falsity.
Why/how?
How does truth divide from falsity, or why?
Because they are inherently opposite.
What is inherently opposite to falsity? Truth
Who is inherently opposite to truth? Falsity
Can you verify this with inquiry?
Is falsity truth, and is truth falsity?
A grammar of both words, is a prerequisite to forming the questions.
If person A says: 1+1=2 and a person B says: 1+1=3, according to that you don't know the answer, wich person you believe if they both are the best 2 people on the planet at math and why?
First you define what 1 is:
1, a singular unit, the lowest whole number.
Then you define what + is:
The function of addition, the sum.
Then you define what = is:
The function of equality, the quality of being the same
Then you define what 2 is:
The lowest even number.
Then you define what 3 is:
The lowest prime number.
Those are just the basics, of course you would need to define the system they function in and other pertinent respective functions/definitions.
From that you form the questions.
Who/What statement of the two is true: 1+1=2 or 1+1=3?
Evidently once you understand the grammar you can answer the question:
1 added to 1 is the same as 2, the first statement is true.
1 added to 1 is the same as 3, the second statement is false.
You believe nobody on statements of truth, you can validate truth yourself, belief is not a prerequisite to finding truth, a prerequisite is grammar, you need to understand the grammar or the definition/meaning of the terms used and the you can use critical thinking and logic to come to the conclusion.
You can verify and validate truth and you can invalidate falsity with inquiry.
Who, What, Where, When, and Why.
But, what then when you feel that they both are right?
Another question only for you: Why did you get flagged?
I get it thanks a lot for those great explanations and sorry that you get flagged all the way.