Game Theory 101 - Schelling point or "Why is important"

in steemit •  last year 

I intended to write this earlier but I wanted to make a more "idea dense" post. As it turns out, I discovered @cryptogee this evening (courtesy of @abh12345) and one of his recent posts in the series "What's the point of Steemfest"

In it he reckons steem is much more than but the latter is still the "focal point". Writes @cryptogee:

In a recent Reddit poll, whereby readers were asked to identify alt coins by their logos alone, as you'd probably expect Ethereum was the most recognised. However when it came to Steem, the readers almost universally identified the Steem logo as Steemit.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority of the State of New York [CC BY 2.0 (], via Wikimedia Commons

That happens to be important - the term "focal point" comes from Game Theory when the problem to solve is one of "coordination without communication". Think about it in a "lab context": look at the image below and silently pick one of the four squares. If we both pick the same square (without the possibility to communicate with one another), we win $20 each !...

If I have no idea whatsoever about who the other person is, I'll pick the red square

The classic academic experiment involves a class of students who are told that they'll meet a stranger tomorrow in New York but have no idea where, nor when. They are then asked to indicate where would they go and when. As it turns out, the vast majority indicates Grand Central Station (photo above) at 12:00

Now the steem blockchain being so versatile, it is host to numerous projects. While many were variations of the initial "content platform" of, such as, or, newer projects start using the blockchain in new and different ways, such as or the simple (yet very effective) wallet of @roelandp, Steemwallet (no content there, just simple, fast, free transfers!)

Moreover, even a casual observer will notice that does not try very hard to stay ahead of the competition - it has barely improved in more than a year and lacks the bells and whistles of newer, more competitive web applications. Whenever Steemit Inc. is asked the question, there appears (somewhat surprisingly) to be no love lost between @ned and what one would think is "his baby", namely the application...

Why that is so, it's secondary. Upon searching, the theories offered turn around three points:

  • encourages behaviors which are costly to sustain in the long term (content production is a lot more resource consuming than the simple transfers of a wallet)
  • distracts and obnubilates the users who forget how much more capable this blockchain is.
  • For content creation there are so many better dApps out there

Nevermind that the first is a bit at odds with the third, as those many dApps for content creation incentivise people to do precisely the "costly" activity.

More important is to stress what a pity neglecting is and what a "value destruction" risk it entails. To think of a timely analogy, it's a bit as if Ned and were like Roger Ver and the "Core" team of Bitcoin (don't take this literally and don't look too much into it, no insult intended) - as if Ned wanted to "fork" the minds and allegiances of the community and pry them from the original focal point,, in order to bring them to a new focal point.

And because I write this post not in 2017 at the time of the BCH fork but in 2018 during the "hash war" pitting BCH ABC versus BCH SV, one only has to watch that debacle to realize what stirring a community which has made into its "Grand Central Station at noon" could lead to in terms of value destruction.

I believe neglecting and letting it wither presents an almost existential risk for the community. was what brought the people together here in the first place and it still offers a competitive mix of functionalities and user experience despite under-investment. is to this blockchain what Bitcoin core is to the bitcoin blockchain. No matter how many "Gold" and "Diamond" and "Private" and other "forks" appear (read: dApps), newcomers, "normies" mostly come through and will likely do so for a long time. Moreover, while the 300 "hardcore steemians" who participated to Steemfest realize that steem is much more than, that might not necessarily be the case for the majority of the roughly 200 000 people active on this blockchain.

Making people "forget" about once the newly announced Destiny UI comes out is likely to be expensive and might produce unintended consequences.

What to do then?

Well, my mind sides with @cryptogee and @ned - we need to show the world how many other powerful applications can be powered by steem, beyond I am doing so myself in an institutional setting with the EFTG project.

But my heart aches when I see being neglected. As much as I would like to be only reasonable, I, and I believe many other "steemians", feel an emotional attachment to even when posting from (as is the case with this article). Let's hope we manage to "paint the square nb. 2 (above) back in white and paint another one in red".

If you know what witnesses are and agree that people commited to keeping this blockchain ticking play an important role ...

(by simply clicking on the picture - thanks to SteemConnect)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Steem is definitely so much more than Steemit and it is what most here seek when committing to its future. However, I agree with your assessment that leaving Steemit behind can have consequences. I have been actively experimenting with new DApps to engage on the platform but continue to find myself returning to Steemit for voting for witness or making transfers among other actions just because that it what I was oriented to do since beginning. Imagine others that are less vested here? What incentive do they have to move? I envision that Steem should have an interface similar to its ecosystem where everything is connected by one portal instead of the continuous gateways needed to access then today. I think a challenge for adoption is this user experience which is antiquated with its current interface.

The internal market too. Busy has not integrated it yet. Don't know whether any other interface has. Maybe steempeak?

thanks for sharing

I echo your sentiments my friend... but I'm slowly but surely moving away from them... I'm convinced is going to end up dying one day in the future and maybe, just maybe, that's for the best.

I wish it 'll turn out to be true ... Still, it hurts. Like having to throw away an old sweater that is warm and soft and you had and worn for many many years and now it's kinda' full of tiny moth-made holes ...

Hi @sorin.cristescu!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 5.783 which ranks you at #400 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 217 contributions, your post is ranked at #17.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Good user engagement!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

As a follower of @followforupvotes this post has been randomly selected and upvoted! Enjoy your upvote and have a great day!

Congratulations @sorin.cristescu! You received a personal award!

Thank you for your participation in the "Meet The Steemians" contest in Kraków. We hope you enjoyed it and made lots of new friends. See you at SteemFest4!

Click here to view your Board of Honor

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

Meet the Steemians Contest - The results, the winners and the prizes
Meet the Steemians Contest - Special attendees revealed
Meet the Steemians Contest - Intermediate results

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!