You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Reward Pool Abuse - Supporting Evidence - @lexiconical

in #steemit7 years ago

you said it was a loved one behind @nikez452 account voting @lexiconical.

this is irrelavant.

bottom line,both are associated accounts using stake to abuse reward system.

your argument stating the posts hes made are helpful so he has privilege to do so is a big problem with steemit.
investors and witnesses who abuse the rewards system using work done as granting privileges over other users to spam and abuse the platform.

you realize content creators give value to steemit not investors.

investors give funds for the incentive system which should be distributed to content creators which would drive traffic increase new users and future investors.

have you ever heard of a company where investors take what they feel they deserve from the budget,

no because this will destroy potential of any growth.

Sort:  

Bah! You mischaracterize my statement. I did not say that @lexiconical should be privileged to rewards because he's a great guy.

"your argument stating the posts hes made are helpful so he has privilege to do so is a big problem with steemit."

I said he's posted great content. His rewards are derived BECAUSE he's a great guy, and that's why he posts great content.

"...the incentive system which should be distributed to content creators which would drive traffic increase new users and future investors."

And that is exactly what @lexiconical does.

I reckon I am done with this conversation. I doubt anyone will read further than this that hasn't already made up their mind.

Loading...

"bottom line,both are associated accounts using stake to abuse correctly reward"

FTFY.

"you realize content creators give value to steemit not investors."

Wrong, and irrelevant, because I'm both.

I pay the bills around here, so that you have a bridge to troll under. Slink away while you still can.

investors generally dont take pay from the budget of a company

content you create is minimal recent witness threads are transcribed details from witness threads not much value there and receive little views even though you take over top of witness section doing so with upvoting bots

There's a lot more than transcribing witness threads. I have to do a lot of different research on these threads, and I still miss details, are you are quick to point out.

"investors generally dont take pay from the budget of a company"

Have you heard of dividends?

i noticed, as in you had posted multiple times on dead witnesses

steemits dividends are automatically added to accounts not from content "reward" pool

here is one i setup and haven't used

"as in you had posted multiple times on dead witnesses"

I'm done fanning your flames. You are a maniac.

OF COURSE I POST ON DEAD WITNESSES. I POST ON EVERY WITNESS IN ORDER (mostly). THE MORE WITNESSES I POST ON, THE MORE TOOLS I USE TO TRACK THEM.

Since I post on EVERY WITNESS, I am going to post on DEAD WITNESSES. I try to point that out but SOMETIMES I FORGET.

I don't recall signing your witness-thread employment contract.

he gave me enuff comments to vote on i can logout for 3 days.

yes you damage voting system by making threads not stating such
example

https://steemit.com/witness-category/@lexiconical/steempty-meet-the-witnesses-44

also your recent
https://steemit.com/witness-category/@lexiconical/arhag-meet-the-witnesses-52

which i pointed out that was inactive then you edit and lied saying you had stated already

https://phist.steemdata.com/history?identifier=https%3A%2F%2Fsteemit.com%2Fwitness-category%2F%40lexiconical%2Farhag-meet-the-witnesses-52

also you seem to have some kind of issue with disabled people considering the amount of times you said i was autistic

you really are a piece of shit

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 62311.78
ETH 2418.00
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.67