DECENTRALIZATION MEETS UNCERTAINTY

The 11 secrets of ALDI's success can be summed up in a single keyword: Simplicity. Simplicity at all levels and in all areas, not just in terms of product range and space. This external simplicity of the ALDI stores is not a sales psychology measure, as has often been assumed, but an expression of the corporate culture, which is also consistently implemented and lived internally. ALDI does not use staff positions, controlling departments, management consulting, annual planning, market analyses, customer surveys, advertising agencies, condition systems for suppliers, highly complicated technology and calculation methods. Even managers are selected according to character traits such as simplicity and modesty...

I have chosen this example from economy because I like the idea of simplicity also attached to the decentralization idea.

Now listen to my recording and reflections upon the topic of "Decentralization":

^{Technical information:
This is my very first video which I produced with an audio device. It took about three hours to upload it. As I am not familiar with the other apps like d-tube (from which I am not convinced performance wise) and I somehow worked myself through the software "Garageband" in converting an audio into a video through I-movie I am happy that the thing made it online. I'd have appreciated another solution as this is way too time consuming - my laptop almost got a fever from overheating and the fan barely was able to catch up and made a noise like an old ferry, but is actually brand new.}

^{I am most certain that I used the technology not in it's best way, so if someone has a recommendation for converting mp3 files into a video format, please let me know.}

^{The video still is actually also a motif of I-movie, it provides a small selection of background images, so I'm lucky to have found something suitable for the topic of decentralization. I was not able to drag and drop a photograph from my hard-drive resp. the Internet.}

^{Length:
Listen to 23 Minutes of reflection.}

---

Motivation for the recording:

To revive an older habit. I practice free speech. I train my English and what it is like to speak freely in a foreign language and let the mind run its course.
To do something other than writing.
To get used to other technologies.

---

Decentralization is big, especially here on Steemit,

but also outside in the world. Many people are working on it and thinking about how to meet the local needs of people in a global world.

At the moment a picture is opening up for me which I cannot overlook in its entirety ( but in which I have trust). As far as I can see, there is a large variation of decisions here.

Organic growth?

It remains to be seen how Steemit will change and whether the multitude of communities will be preserved or whether we will become a pure economy in this ecology. The fact that groups form in such a large space is not only natural but also good. It'll show how much diversity and opportunities for development there are for groups that found something of their own. Whether the many swarms will then fly to the largest butterfly gatherings, which care about complementarity and which even do not push their self-preservation so far that changes cannot flourish (make it rigid). Keeping a healthy balance in a virtual ecology is probably as difficult as it is in a world that we share with plants and animals and which is therefore much more complex.

Rules

One problem, I think, is definition. Every definition is by its very nature excluding.
Once words appear solid and immutable and a law is set, all other definitions fall down. Therefore, if I formulate rules that are rigid, I do not leave enough room for morphological modification of rules. Unwritten rules always work very well because they are unwritten. But if I have something lawful, there are two consequences: Punishment and Reward Mechanisms. The measuring instrument is always only as good or as bad as it is flexible and allows variations. So how many parameters does my measuring instrument have to contain in order to map as many variants as possible? How much energy is used (by what or whom) for punishment and how much for reward? What time periods do I include? At the end of the day I only ever come up with a quantitative result. Quality, on the other hand, is something that is experienced and determined on a more personal level.

Consequences of code

We can already see how the sheer number of rules and laws is crushing us. What is actually the consequence of this, if we oppose this numerological superiority with one that has no problem with both speed and numbers? Could it not also be that a further - even exponential - increase of rules and laws is promoted, since we then have the method via AI to meet any mass, no matter how far it still condenses? How capable are we of acting as humans, but above all do we trust ourselves as humans when we need reinsurance for every action?

In this way, what is supposed to liberate us can also become an even narrower prison. In fact, wanting to keep up is not necessarily the only motivation or wanted solution.

If decentralization is based on a group dynamic that relies also on changing - unwritten - laws that respond more flexibly to change, what technological means should a group use that functions by means of an AI or code? Where do we humans need real time?

Self-awareness and exchange in the groups is therefore important and would Steemit have first gone online, for example, with the announcement and functionality that certain preconceived rules exist for group building: wouldn't that simply have been a centralized method and we wouldn't be in the many dilemmas we have here on the blockchain? So having a dilemma and wanting to deal with it is something good, because revealing a process and making processes visible is sometimes very enriching.

In order to mature people have to be left to their own devices.

Beyond Steemit

But this is only one aspect of decentralisation. It becomes interesting to ask what the individual peer groups do, for example, when they reach a wider readership - and at the same time, as a result, more content producers? Where does the transfer to the tangible world take place?

Decentralization lab

However, I am interested in systems and how the respective systems make their decisions. As I see it, Steemit is an example - actually a laboratory - of how groups form and what dynamics they develop to reach consensus and decide on rules. It is like a field of experimentation that we seem to be considering for future scenarios. How much code do we want and use in relation to common sense the ethics each and every one of us carries already?

Experiencing along the road

I have seen some consensus-building efforts here and have been involved myself in debates. The methods and parameters that are devised and created along the way are often quite hot topics for discussion. This is basically the strength of decentralisation. People are realising very clearly - maybe even for the first time - how difficult it can be to reach agreement. The tenacious experiences and the struggle for consensus are very valuable and I think that those with more responsibility than others can perhaps imagine how one feels as a politician or as a leader team of a company. Sometimes I think that the tools which are so enthusiastically developed actually are not needed so much in the end, as the debate itself about the tools brought so much experience and knowledge.

It's like creating an elaborate a cheat aid that you don't even need after all.
In trial and error and making it not too complex there lays great strength.

---

Quotation sources of the recording:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization

Quote source from ALDI corporation:
http://www.weka.de/oldmediadb/000003621.pdf (translated from German)