Bid Bots are Killing Steem
Dear Steemians,
Today I read @jerrybanfield's article about bid bots (Upvoting vs Voting Bots on Steem!
), and I'd like to share my opinion about how bid bots are killing Steem community. (Below is the comment I wrote on his post.)
I'm a creator of Steemhunt, a daily ranking community for cool new products on top of Steem blockchain. I began this project two months ago, and honestly these are my thoughts/struggles about voting bot issues.
There are three types of abuse in Steemit - 100% self voting, Circulating votings on self accounts, and delegating SP to bid bots. Many people agree that the first and second one are abuse. But not many people agree that delegating SP on bid bots is abuse. There are two main problems with delegating SP on bid bots.
First, bid bots do not return any profit to the users who bid. Actually the return is -5 ~ -15% to their paid amount. It only returns commissions to bid bot operators and rewards for delegators. This means that delegation to bid bot is another type of SELF VOTING POOL.
Second, most of whale's SP are converged on bid bots nowadays. I can't find the exact amount, but top 10 bid bots' full voting amount is over 250 SBD now. However, upvoting from bid bots are not creating any value for our communities because IT IS JUST AN AD. The voting is not linked to the value of the content. Thus, most of whale's SP pools are just using for nothing.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmcVgEY2XcabE75QVmgUERxoizpDG4VW2ENrtDkn45EdKF/image.png)
(Delegating SP on bid bots are another way of self-voting mechanism - image from @tabris)
Honestly, we are quite stressful nowadays because we invested our money to have a DApp business based on Steem. I believe our project can create lots of values for Steem community - I explained our vision on our launching post here - Introducing Steemhunt: Daily ranking of effortlessly cool products fueled by STEEM blockchain.
We have a short-term plan to compete with Product Hunt, an original inspiration of Steemhunt to attract users from more than 8 mil MAU pools. We have also mid-term plan to make HUNT token economy based on SMT platform to create "Product Influencer's Crowd Funding Platform."
To do this, we are running an SP delegation program by giving 5% rewards to the delegators. The explanations of this program are here - Introducing Incentives for Steemhunt Sponsors. So far we gathered 22k SP on @steemhunt account from 14 delegators. We feel very thankful to them because they delegated their precious SP to us even though THEY COULD GAIN FAR HIGHER PROFITS IF THEY DELEGATED IT TO BID BOTS. They delegated to us because they believe that investing Steem DApp proejcts is crucial for Steem's long-term growth.
We really think this situation should be changed. The start-ups like us on Steem are struggling a lot to receive SP delegations from whales because of bid bots. And those bid bots are not creating ANY SINGLE VALUE FOR STEEM.
Look at the current trending taps on Steemit. Most of posts are using bid bots. Even the witnesses are using them. I'm surprised that no one thinks this is a critical issue. I strongly believe that being occupied by bid bots will definitely kill Steem community for three main reasons.
- It kills the opportunities for quality posts observed naturally.
- SP pools are wasting because of the self-voting mechanism by bid bots.
- It kills the opportunities for whales to invest in the hundreds of Steem DApp projects even though many of the projects will bring longterm benefits to the Steem blockchain.
Any opinions on this issue are totally welcome. Please let me know what think about this issue. I know @ned and Steemit Inc. are preparing to solve these issues by bringing several projects - HIVE and Oracles (Account-based voting and Good Person Token). However, we don't know when they will arrive on Steem. More than 70 mil SP on @steemit and 20 mil SP on @misterdelegation are just sleeping there without helping the Steem DApp projects. They are not trying to make other successful projects like @utopian-io, @dtube, or @dlive.
You've nailed it!
And although people mainly complain about bid bots because organic curation is disappearing, they're also responsible for the lack of delegations to worthwhile projects in the STEEM ecosystem.
As you say, when people can make a tangible return on their investment from selling votes, why would they bother supporting community projects through delegation.
Bid Bots aren't just killing curation, they're killing innovation.
There's a reason why @ned created @misterdelegation and funded it accordingly, but that system has failed the developers of this platform.
We'd like our backstory to include, Steemit INC as a supporter of innovation but right now it hasn't played any part in our journey so is unlikely to be worth a mention in our upcoming press releases.
Maybe we aren't worthy of delegation, or maybe we need to find a platform that thinks we are.
What people don't realise is apps like ours are like STEEM faucets, we help to distribute STEEM to people outside of this ecosystem.
Inward facing apps, just serve the existing market. We want to see STEEM grow to it's full potential and empower others to adopt the STEEM Blockchain.
Hi @blockdeals! I saw your project that was introduced in Steemhunt - https://steemhunt.com/@urbangladiator/blockdeals-earn-steem-for-finding-deals. It was so impressive!
Yes, I totally agree with that Steemit can support more projects like yours which attracts users from outside. Sometimes using bid bots to promote some post is helpful, but the problem happens when everyone needs to use bid bots. Most of SPs are gathering in bid bots. Many posts need to use bid bots to make people read them. Then, I guess Steemit is likely to be a ad-based community.
Agreed Steemit is becoming more ad-based than curation based. Even with some healthy votes from whales, we are no where near the trending page.
And since we're looking for visibility we have no option but to use the bots. I'm sure many others feel like this too.