The Fascinating Fingerprint Technology

in #science2 years ago (edited)

In the world of security, there seemed to be no shortage of how to secure our asset. We have facial recognition devices that can recognise and grant access to only the pre-programmed face or faces. There is the iris recognition retinal scan like that found in Samsung S8 phones and other devices that can scan the irises of the user and thereby grant access to a device usage or access.

These are part of a biometric identification system which uses a part of the human body as a password to unlock or grant access. There are others which include palm, voice authentication system, and fingerprint recognition system. Out of these security/identification methods, the fingerprint is the most popular biometric system of choice.

It is the most popular for some reasons. The main one is its ability to remain the same (though there may be subtle changes) and unique for each user when compared to other processes such as voice, signature, etc. which often changes with time, hence the need for an update. Another is its low power consumption therefore easily deployed in portable devices such as phones, USB flash drives, laptops, etc.


A Little History of the Fingerprint Technology


The fingerprint technology dates back to the late 19th century. All through the 1800s, there were interests in the use of fingerprint. But the first person to observe and document (in a scientific basis) the use of a fingerprint as a means of identification was Sir Francis Galton in 1888. He later published a book in 1892, Fingerprints which made the first classification made for fingerprints which will be a significant resource for forensic science/investigation.

Fast forward to 1946, the F.B.I manually processed over 100 million fingerprint cards, a figure that jumped to twice the number in 1971. You can imagine the efforts that go into manually looking through the cards.


From Pixabay

By 1999, managing the large cache of about 33 million records of criminals becomes easier as the FBI now had a computerised system known as the Automated Fingerprint ID System (AFIS) technology. With the system you can get a match in minutes.

Today the AFIS system has up to 40 million records and handles 70,000 queries daily.


How a fingerprint scanner work


The fingers and thumbs are not smooth; there are some raised rough patterns (ridges) which enables a firm grip that runs all through it. Each person, has a unique pattern, as determined by the DNA, which encodes a unique design for each. Are there chances that two individuals could bear the same fingerprint? Well, theoretically there is, the fingerprint expert, Sir Francis Galton, put the probability of that happening to one in 64 bilion. That is eight times the number of people we currently have on earth. That is a very big odd which does not even favour identical twins as their fingerprints are just as unique as everyone else.

So, what a scanner does is similar to taking a photo of the finger's ridges and valleys. But this is no ordinary photograph; it works by shining a bright light, much as a photocopier does when taking a digital picture of the fingers.


Accessing a government building in Brazil, from Wikipedia Commons [CC BY-SA 3.0 ]

An array of LED bulbs creates a very bright light. The image sensor usually a charge coupled device (CCD) or CMOS captures the reflected image from the finger. The capture duration usually determines how sharp and clear the fingerprint will be. Other software determines if the image of the fingerprint is ok or to be discarded.
Oil, dirt, or skin damage determine if a particular scanner can capture a fingerprint.

There is another type of fingerprint capture technology that does not convert reflected light into electronic signals. This type requires the use of capacitive sensors. These are the types you see on mobile phones, etc.

In the capacitive sensors, the fingerprint raised surface (ridges) and grooves (valleys) produce different electric signals at different parts of the finger.

The scanner processor then builds a digital image of the different voltage output corresponding to both the ridge and valley of the finger.

It has an advantage of being more accurate than a fingerprint optical scanner in producing a fingerprint aside from being more compact and low energy consumption.


A Mobile Phone's Fingerprint Scanner, from Wikipedia Commons By Ilya Plekhanov [CC BY-SA 4.0]

The other day I mistakenly tried to unlock my phone using the left index finger, and it was unsuccessful. It only opened when I tried the right index finger. All the fingers have different unique, distinctive features, and the sophisticated scanner knows how to pick the differences.


Using a dead finger to unlock a device


Can I hack off a human finger and use it to unlock either a device, gain access to a secured location, etc.?

In the 1997 movie, Gattaca, Ethan Hawk was able to cheat a fingerprint and DNA scan when he concealed a drop of blood behind a cut off finger skin.

But in reality, the truth is that such an attempt is likely to fail.

On March 23, 2018, a 30-year-old Linus Phillip was shot and killed by police in Largo Florida in the USA outside of a store for refusal to stop for a search while attempting to flee from police.

He uses an iPhone which after 48-hour last access requires a password, but the police were able to get to the body before the time elapsed. But it was already too late; his finger was unable to unlock his phone to aid the police in their investigation.

But, fingerprints are not supposed to change. Or do they vary in death?


Ghoulish science


A research shows that even though fingerprints is something we see as unchangeable, that over time that the ridges in a person's fingers, experience little changes after some time. That is what makes identification less reliable after many years.

A dead finger on the other hand experiences degradation as a result of either desiccation or deterioration.


From Pixabay

But the medical examiners can remove the finger and apply the technique of thanatopractical processing. This process involves taking bodily fluid from another part of the body to restore volume in the fingers to improve the ridge and valley prominence to get a higher quality print from the deceased.

But that can only help in identifying a Jane or John Doe, and it may not work in unlocking a capacitive sensor fingerprint scanner.

The reason is simple; the body has some small electrical charges running through it. That is why, unless you are using a special capacitive stylus pen, the capacitive touchscreen of your phone won't respond to other devices that touch it.

The iPhone's Touch ID ensures only a finger that is alive can unlock the fingerprint-locked phone. This information, I think, is excellent news, at least iPhone users will have one less thing to worry about- nobody will go around hacking off their fingers to access their phone.

REFERENCES

  1. History of Fingerprint
  2. AFIS Technology
  3. How Fingerprint Scanner Work
  4. Capacitive Sensing
  5. Do a Person’s Fingerprints Change After Death?
Sort:  

Thank you for your contribution. Dont forget to link references and sources when applicable!

=======================================================================================
This post was upvoted and resteemed by Steemgridcoin with the aim of promoting discussions surrounding Gridcoin and science.

This service is free. You can learn more on how to help here.

Have a nice day. :)

Thanks a lot for the upvote and resteem.

I didn't know that about Francis Galton. Interesting.

About 2 weeks ago I was out with a girl and she tried to unlock her phone using her fingerprint 5 times and then had to wait for a countdown of ~ 3 min because of all the wrong trials.

I use pattern recognition because of such reasons. A pattern is a pattern. A number is a number. A fingerprint can give a wrong signal.

But I think the best tool we have is the social one. All these passwords can be beaten out of you with a hammer. But 'social security' can simply say "this value transfer was illegal...funds returned" or something. I'm talking of course about money, but I guess it could be applied more broadly.

I really liked the last two sections cos I was thinking about that while I was reading the article, and then not only you mentioned it but you answered it using science!

I find the finger print unlock pretty a fast way to unlock a device. Though it has a downside, you are stuck when your finger is wet or you are putting on a glove. I think a should surfer may spy your pattern and unlock your phone later. That sort of thing can't work on fingerprint. I use both password and fingerprint to lock my device. If the fingerprint is acting up, I just type in the 4-digit password.

This is rally fascinating

there are some raised rough patterns (ridges) which enables a firm grip that runs all through it. Each person, has a unique pattern, as determined by the DNA, which encodes a unique design for each.

DNA..... Can it be hacked with a relatives print

Thanks for the info

DNA is not something one can copy or hack. You can only alter it.

So you can manipulate.... Pretty cool

No, you can't manipulate DNA in the sense that you can't change your DNA. It is unique only to you. Thank you.

Any suggestions for people in the process of aging... Their finger print changes all the time.. So fingerprint technology isn't that easy for them..

There is no suggestion but to tell people to take more good care of themselves. The changes on the fingerprint are as a result of wear and tear due to age and use. It is not a significant change per se, just some slight difference. How are you? I have been offline since today due to the poor network from my internet service providers. But I'm happy to be back.

Thanx... Check my funny post today.. :) btw my father in law fingerprint is problematic everytime... It really drastically changes n doesn't gets authentified.. I think this is drawback of fingerprint technology.

That may be as a result of oil, dirt, or wet on fingers/scanner surface. Some may due to wear too, the ridges and valleys may no longer be as prominent as they used to, giving the scanner a harder time to make a match. I will check your post now.

Haha oil or dirt😋😂

Yeah, they are the usual suspect when this happens. It somehow makes it hard for the scanner to get a good digital image of the fingerprint. A dry clean hand works best. Other times it may just be the fingers have worn so much with use/age that it is not as it was before.

This is nicely explained, I also think the ability of the fingerprint scanner not to accept a hacked off or dead finger is a good security installed.

Haha, for the sake of future fingers, I'm glad that this work.

I've considered cutting off people's fingers, but at the last chance I've always reconsidered. Now I know I didn't go ahead with my plans, it wouldn't have worked anyways :)
Fascinating piece of info. Kudos.

Haha. Please just don't cut off any fingers. Thanks for your anticipated cooperation.

Hi @bitfairy!

Your post was upvoted by utopian.io in cooperation with steemstem - supporting knowledge, innovation and technological advancement on the Steem Blockchain.

Contribute to Open Source with utopian.io

Learn how to contribute on our website and join the new open source economy.

Want to chat? Join the Utopian Community on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV

Congratulations @bitfairy! You have received a personal award!

1 Year on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard!


Participate to the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @lukestockes


Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @bitfairy! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!