Soldiers Killed By ISIS DO NOT 'Know What They Signed Up For' Unless They've Listened To US Gov/Military Whistleblowers.
Trump is in the news again for 'helping' a grieving widow whose husband was killed during active military service in Africa by Isis aligned fighters by telling her "he knew what he signed up for", which was jumped on as being a heartless way to talk to a widow. Not only does his conduct reveal a lack of sensitivity, but he is apparently also simply wrong.
To claim that members of the US military 'know what they signed up for' when it comes to ISIS is a huge misrepresentation of the truth, given the number of whistleblowers from within the US military and CIA who state openly that the CIA funds ISIS and that ISIS is a creation of the US Military and CIA. Even Hillary Clinton openly stated that the US created ISIS.
Dr. Scott Bennett is a whistlblower that appeared in my whistleblower series who states he was in a Psychological Warfare team and that he challenged the US Government's policies - which resulted in him being falsely imprisoned for 2 years. He states that during his time in prison he shared a cell with someone who has documentary proof that the CIA was (and probably still is) funding ISIS directly through swiss banks.
The motivation for the funding appears to be multi-faceted and may include:
- Covertly directing the ISIS proxy army to achieve goals of the US military which would otherwise be impossible due to existing treaties and public perception.
- Increasing sales of weapons to increase financial resources available to the weapons industrial complex which is just an extension of the CIA etc.
- Destabilisation of the Middle East, resulting in an increased ease of land grabbing and taking of oil reserves.
- Creating justifications for demonising Islam in general - continuing to attempt to back up and cover up the reality of the false flag attack that was 911.
I recently also covered another US Whistleblower - Kevin Shipp - who is a highly knowledgeable CIA Agent who has exposed in some detail the way that the CIA not only controls the entire US government system but also uses false flag attacks as a standard method of operation to achieve it's goals. False flag attacks are a military action whereby a military group 'wears the colours' of an opponent and carries out and attack, giving the false impression to observers that the attack was carried out by the opponent. In other words, innocent people are killed to attempt to 'frame' a different army and to then justify further military action that would otherwise be politically unacceptable.
For further reference with regards to false flags, I suggest reviewing the 53 admitted false flags that I also shared here recently.
Trump MUST Know
Give that Trump's popularity was gained to some extent by him supporting Alex Jones and others who exposed 911 and similar events as being examples of false flag terrorism, it is inconceivable that Trump is unaware of the evidence regarding the American involvement in creating the 'boogie man' of ISIS and so it can only mean that when he tells a grieving widow that her husband 'knew what he signed up for' that he is deliberately mis-representing the facts. Trump did not say "We'll get to the bottom of exactly how my predecessors caused these problems to make sure they don't occur again." - instead, he tried to lay the blame of the soldier who very well may NOT have understood the reality of the corruption and evil that runs through the American establishment, government and military that issues him his orders.
Let's end denial now
The only way any of this is going to be correctly resolved and healed is if we choose to end our denials and deal with total reality, instead of selectively filtering out some things in order to only look at the parts we like. Driving towards a cliff at high speed is not going to yield a better result if you close one eye and look up to the sky with the other.
Wishing you well,
Ura Soul
Thanks to @fortified for making my new heart signature :)
Buy My T-Shirts, Gifts & Other Clothing Here.
@ura-soul - I Find myself agreeing with everything mentioned in your post, which is unusual, I can barely agree with myself sometimes... I want to make a comment that's a little off topic but still very relevant to the overall conversation.
What our government is doing is nothing new - the argument could be made that the attack on Pearl Harbor falls into the "false flag" category. The Gulf of Tonkin / USS Maddox incident was directly responsible for the war in Viet Nam. The 1989 invasion of Panama (Operation Just Cause) was "supposedly" due to a single soldier being killed at a US Army checkpoint.(more plausible that Noriega cut off the CIA drug money faucet) I think it is almost universally agreed that 911 not necessarily an inside job, was allowed to happen - whether intentional or through incompetence is irrelevant to the argument.
The specific incident in Niger that led to the four soldiers deaths, is a perfect example of "Divide and Conquer", a practice in use (probably) since the advent of war.
This is part of a comment I made relating to the war in Syria - just as relevant here:
... sound at all familiar.
Soldiers "knowing what they signed up for" is in the literal sense true, but as you stated in the post it's ;
Trumps statement is just another example of just how inept our president is at understanding the broad range of duties required of him, consoling a greiving mother/wife being only one, and the complete ignorance of his statement displays that fact to the world.
Again I think I completely agree with you in echoing:
Occult Origins of the UNITED STATES INC. Banking,…:
Thanks, yes, Jordan Maxwell has a lot of good input into these matters. I don't agree with everything he says but I do appreciate his approach and direction in general.
Thanks for your comment and input here. Yes, the post I made from a few days ago with 53 admitted false flags in it really sets the scene. For me, 911 was very definitely an inside job and there are is a huge volume of evidence to back that up. I feel it really does matter whether or not the actions of the US agencies were through ignorance of maliciousness and from a legal perspective that is key - since, for one, it makes the difference between being prosecuted for malfeasance in office or being executed for treason.
I also think Pearl Harbor was a deliberate setup too. The US gov and mil have been involved in so many false flags that it can be hard to distinguish when there are ANY real conflicts occurring - I'm sure there are many 'organic' conflicts too - but typically they do arise out of actions started by US agencies overtly or covertly. :/
@ura-soul I've had the chance to look through some of your posts, and it's likely that you and I would probably but heads on many issues. That being said, the topics you write about are many of the same topics I believe should be highlighted and discussed - regardless if I agree or disagree. Keep up the good work and I look forward to checking out more of your posts...
Great thanks! Unfortunately, I just wrote you a long reply here and then Steemit failed and I lost it. :/
I was really saying that it's fine to disagree, the key is to learn to bring balance to discussions so that judgemental thoughts and habitual thinking don't cause us to try to attack or overpower each other.. It is exactly these kinds of patterns that are the origins of the problems within the topics we are discussing too (war/conflict etc.).
Disagreements need understanding and understanding needs patience, enquiry and exploration of the type which can be done in internet spaces like this.
I'm glad to meet you as one who also understands the importance of the topics I am covering. :)
I followed you here too.
Yes, we do need the truth on these matters. The only reason these stupid wars and funding isis or al qaeda happens is because of govt secrecy and not being held accountable.
If this info was publically available and the average everyday man knew about it we would have huge protests or vote people out.
In effect we are funding enemies so we can justify going there to fight them. This is part of the profitable military industrial complex. Since war is good for business they need to continuously invent wars, with the side benefit of having a military force who has actual combat exp(but we shouldnt do it this way).
So much logic and facts, and then you miss the mark by so much.
Lets just assume that ISIS was put together by the CIA, mossad, and Saudi Arabia. There is just too much evidence and supporting data.
If I was in the white house, it would have been the first order of business to have the CIA director in my office saying, you did this, explain yourself. Then, he would go sit in jail, while I question the 2nd, repeat (until the white house suddenly blew up)
But then, I am for the truth at almost any cost.
Chump knows these people. He is old friends with the Clintons...
He knows what power they wield. Hey, they have a private, evil army at their disposal.
Further, the order of business is to continue shifting the blame. "We have to uphold the social contract" (is why taxes are mandatory) same as "He knew what he signed up for"
If soldiers where actually told what they had done to them, from illegal medical research to political assassination, all the soldiers would march on washington and burn it to the ground. They thought they signed up for defending amercia. Not be used as guinea pigs or cannon fodder so a corp could get richer.
And since Chump is a narcissist, if not a psychopath, then it follows that he has no actual feelings for the fallen soldier. His position is to protect the govern-cement and say something that increases further soldier loyalty.
Which is pretty much what he did.
I'm not clear from your comment why you think I missed the mark - I didn't disagree with anything you wrote.
Ummm... you don't try to shame a narcissist into making a correct choice.
It doesn't work, and it will just come back to bite you.
I'm not trying to shame anyone - I am pointing out the obvious deceptions in use within the 'mainstream narrative' to nudge those who may be unaware to reconsider their perceptions of what they are seeing when they look at 'the news' and also the 'great leader of trumpistan'.
This post has received a 28.57 % upvote from @upgoater thanks to: @ura-soul.
Gladio B and the Battle for Eurasia:
Breaking! Gladio B Assassinates Journalist With C…: