RE: Soldiers Killed By ISIS DO NOT 'Know What They Signed Up For' Unless They've Listened To US Gov/Military Whistleblowers.
@ura-soul - I Find myself agreeing with everything mentioned in your post, which is unusual, I can barely agree with myself sometimes... I want to make a comment that's a little off topic but still very relevant to the overall conversation.
What our government is doing is nothing new - the argument could be made that the attack on Pearl Harbor falls into the "false flag" category. The Gulf of Tonkin / USS Maddox incident was directly responsible for the war in Viet Nam. The 1989 invasion of Panama (Operation Just Cause) was "supposedly" due to a single soldier being killed at a US Army checkpoint.(more plausible that Noriega cut off the CIA drug money faucet) I think it is almost universally agreed that 911 not necessarily an inside job, was allowed to happen - whether intentional or through incompetence is irrelevant to the argument.
The specific incident in Niger that led to the four soldiers deaths, is a perfect example of "Divide and Conquer", a practice in use (probably) since the advent of war.
This is part of a comment I made relating to the war in Syria - just as relevant here:
Most notably, the British empire would employ the tactic as a mechanism to control a colony, or to destabilize a country or region they wished to take control of - the British have since acknowledged it was used to crush opposition to their colonial rule in Kenya, in Malaysia, in Northern Ireland, and in the American colonies. The concept is for an artificial conflict to be constructed which turns factions within the targeted populations against each other, with agent provocateurs running both sides, leading to countless deaths, and destroying any capacity for a united fight against the actual enemy—the British Empire.
... sound at all familiar.
Soldiers "knowing what they signed up for" is in the literal sense true, but as you stated in the post it's ;
a huge misrepresentation of the truth
Trumps statement is just another example of just how inept our president is at understanding the broad range of duties required of him, consoling a greiving mother/wife being only one, and the complete ignorance of his statement displays that fact to the world.
Again I think I completely agree with you in echoing:
... The only way any of this is going to be correctly resolved and healed is if we choose to end our denials and deal with total reality
Occult Origins of the UNITED STATES INC. Banking,…:
Thanks, yes, Jordan Maxwell has a lot of good input into these matters. I don't agree with everything he says but I do appreciate his approach and direction in general.
Thanks for your comment and input here. Yes, the post I made from a few days ago with 53 admitted false flags in it really sets the scene. For me, 911 was very definitely an inside job and there are is a huge volume of evidence to back that up. I feel it really does matter whether or not the actions of the US agencies were through ignorance of maliciousness and from a legal perspective that is key - since, for one, it makes the difference between being prosecuted for malfeasance in office or being executed for treason.
I also think Pearl Harbor was a deliberate setup too. The US gov and mil have been involved in so many false flags that it can be hard to distinguish when there are ANY real conflicts occurring - I'm sure there are many 'organic' conflicts too - but typically they do arise out of actions started by US agencies overtly or covertly. :/
@ura-soul I've had the chance to look through some of your posts, and it's likely that you and I would probably but heads on many issues. That being said, the topics you write about are many of the same topics I believe should be highlighted and discussed - regardless if I agree or disagree. Keep up the good work and I look forward to checking out more of your posts...
Great thanks! Unfortunately, I just wrote you a long reply here and then Steemit failed and I lost it. :/
I was really saying that it's fine to disagree, the key is to learn to bring balance to discussions so that judgemental thoughts and habitual thinking don't cause us to try to attack or overpower each other.. It is exactly these kinds of patterns that are the origins of the problems within the topics we are discussing too (war/conflict etc.).
Disagreements need understanding and understanding needs patience, enquiry and exploration of the type which can be done in internet spaces like this.
I'm glad to meet you as one who also understands the importance of the topics I am covering. :)
I followed you here too.