Is the TIDE turning? - Legalising Cannabis in the UK could raise £1 billion a year according to new report
Introduction
As some of you will know already I have been a critic of current drugs policy and you can read some of my previous thoughts here. In summary some of my main thoughts on the current drugs policy are:
- It does not reduce drug use or minimise harm and criminalises people unnecessarily.
- It stifles research and restricts potential medical uses.
- It diverts potential tax revenues into crime and also wastes money in the criminal justice system which would be better used in treating addiction.
The Tide Effect - A report from the Adam Smith Institute
A think tank known as the Adam Smith Institute has released a report today called "The Tide Effect". If you are unfamiliar with the Adam Smith Institute here is a quick summary from Wikipedia:
The Adam Smith Institute (ASI) is a free market libertarian think tank and lobbying group based in the United Kingdom, named after Adam Smith, a Scottish moral philosopher and classical economist.[1][2][3] It advocates free market and classical liberal ideas, primarily via the formation of radical policy options with regard to Public Choice theory, which political decision makers seek to develop upon.
They are actually quite famous in the UK and I have generally found them to be quite sensible in what they do suggest. There also seems to be a growing body of politicians who are starting to listen to what they say:
Here is a short excerpt from the start of the Tide Effect to give you an idea of the kind of things they are saying:
- The government strategy is based around three main pillars: reducing demand, restricting supply and building recovery. All three are failing.
- Regulation is substantially more desirable than simple decrimi- nalisation or unregulated legalisation, because only regulation addresses all four key issues: ensuring that the product meets acceptable standards of quality and purity; removing criminal gangs from the equation as far as possible; raising revenue for the Treasury through point-of-sale taxation; and best protecting pub- lic health.
- The entire language used to address cannabis-related issues needs to change. Language poses a barrier every bit as formidable
as legislation does. The opponents of legalisation have long been able to reinforce their position by using the words of public fear – ‘illegal,’ ‘criminal’, ‘dangerous’, and so on. Only by using the language of public health, consumer rights and harm reduction, the same language used about alcohol and tobacco, can we move towards regulation.- The scale of a legalised industry will be huge. The US market is estimated to be worth $25bn by the time of the next election in 2020. A similarly regulated UK market could be worth around £7bn per annum.
Most of the points I have previously made are covered in the report and it makes a lot of sense. It also goes into detailed discussion of the current findings of legalisation/decriminalisation in the US states and other nations.
I want to keep this short as I have covered most of these points before so I wont go into any more detail. Please give it a read.
The report has cross-party backing - BBC Article
The report is also discussed in a BBC article today which provides a bit of a TLDR version of it. Of particular interest in the BBC report is the fact that former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and health minister Norman Lamb are supporting it as part of a cross party group of MPs.
Image of Nick Clegg: Source
Mr Clegg is quoted in the article:
"British politicians need to open their eyes to what is happening in the rest of the world.
Cannabis prohibition is being swept away on a tide of popular opinion and replaced with responsible legal regulation.
Now is the time for ministers to start writing the rules for this legal market, including age limits and health warnings, so that we can finally take back control from the criminal gangs."
For once I find myself wholeheartedly agreeing with a politician!
What do you think?
Are we really seeing the tide turning? Have you read the report - what do you think?
I know this is something that a lot of people feel very strongly about.
Are you in a US state or other nation where "the tide has already turned" with legalisation or decriminalisation? What has your experience been.
Have your say in the comments. Let's get a sensible discussion going on this.
If you like my work and aren't already, please follow me and check out my blog (I mainly discuss photography but I do other topics too) - @thecryptofiend
Photo Credits: All non-sourced photos are taken from my personal Thinkstock Photography account. More information can be provided on request.
(Verification for me here: http://www.aapicture.com/about-me)
Personally I put cannabis on the save level as alcohol, which in the US and UK has been quite legal (outside the short prohibition stint here.) You really can't overdose on cannabis (short of asphyxiation) and I really don't see people doing the 'stupid/dangerous' things they do when drunk while high. Imo it really doesn't make sense for it to be illegal between all the medicinal benefits and the preference for those recreational users. No one ever uses the excuse 'I only did that stupid act because I was high' yet all it's common for those who are drunk.
I should add I'm fine with it being regulated like alcohol, some age limit. But in all honesty, this ban on cannabis has been drawn out by the the industries that it competes with first as hemp, ropes and other materials, now the pharmaceutical industry. Every state it's been opened recreationally has seen the opiod overdoses drastically drop. They make more money off us incessantly popping pills, even though they are way more risky and addictive.
Anyway, just my two cents on the matter. lol
Very good points - I think I covered many of these in my old post. Nothing is risk free and I'm not saying cannabis is fine for everyone but it would be safer to license it as you say like alcohol.
I agree with legalising cannabis under certain guidelines. What exactly are the government trying to prove with banning a leaf anyways?
It never made any sense:)
Governments must be really out of money, as we see the waves of legalization everywhere happening. And this is good, but I think they are just doing this now, to get more tax revenue, as the global economy is collapsing they just look to squeeze every penny out of people.
Perhaps. I'm not going to complain though if it continues to get them to be more pragmatic.
Well at certain points even the government (as irrational as they are) has to recognize that they cant have power over everything. Sending people to jail for victimless crimes is very evil.
They can get their taxes, but at least dont ruin the lives of stupid teenagers whos parents didnt told them to stay away from drugs, by imprisoning them.
Drug addicts need therapy not prison. And people who do it for fun should not be sent to jail.
Exactly.
I'm torn on this one, I agree that criminalising it is stupid, but we are constantly bombarded with anti-smoking messages and restrictions, so we are going to back that message up by encouraging cannabis use. Maybe they just think we will all be to stoned to notice as they use brexit as an excuse to sell off the little we have left of the NHS, and continue to cull the disabled with cuts.
I can sympathise. Discouraging something is not the same thing as making it illegal. Also cannabis can be taken in safer ways than smoking so it doesn't need to be contrary to public health guidelines. It is safer than alcohol and tobacco.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Nov 21. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $4.64 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Nov 21 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.
Thank you:)
This post has been linked to from another place on Steem.
Learn more about and upvote to support linkback bot v0.5. Flag this comment if you don't want the bot to continue posting linkbacks for your posts.
Built by @ontofractal
Thanks:)
Everyone owns his own body, and nobody should own the body of others (no govs, no corps, no one).
Exactly.
As already said in the comments, when money is part of the incentives...
Yes.
The governments are trying way to hard to control every aspect of people's lives
For someone who has possession of a plant can be classified as a criminal is nothing less than absurd .
Yes. It is ridiculous.
excellent writing :)
thank you :D
Thank you:)