in #mlk5 years ago (edited)

I’m going to prove that MLK was a Communist, Sexual Pervert, Plagarist, Fraud and False Prophet!

Cover Martin Luther King Communist Sex SteemTruth.jpg

Don’t shoot the messenger before hearing the message. I know that this topic is dear to many people’s hearts but the truth is the truth.

Martin Luther King Jr (MLK) is universally praised as one of the greatest heroes of the 20th century. Every year on the 3rd Monday in January (today) a U.S. national holiday is celebrated in his honor.

What do you really know about MLK other than what you’ve been told in history books and via tell-a-vision? I’m going to share with you a side to Reverend Dr Martin Luther King Jr that you probably haven’t heard before.

My intention is not to offend but to share truth. I’m not touching the ‘great deeds’ that he did because hundreds of millions of other people are doing that right now and we should never do what the majority is doing because the majority are almost always invariably wrong! Warren Buffet would agree!

This post has nothing to do with race. I don’t have a racist bone in my body. I am not going to judge the Reverend Dr Martin Luther King Jr by the color of his skin but by the content of his character!

I have used a lot of quotes and I would encourage you to read them if you want to gain a much deeper understanding of the Communist Agent that masqueraded as Reverend Dr Martin Luther King Jr.

By way of background I’ll start at the very beginning and quickly point out some highlights before I move on to the more important and relevant events that the history books omitted.

Truth Fears No Investigation - Let’s Investigate!

Young Martin Luther King Boy SteemTruth.jpg

MLK Was Not Born Martin Luther King Jr.

MLK was born Michael King Jr. on January 15, 1929. In 1934, his father, a pastor at Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church, traveled to Germany and became inspired by Protestant Reformation leader Martin Luther. Upon his return to the USA, King Sr. changed his name as well as the name of his 5-year-old son. Source

Growing up in Atlanta, King attended Booker T. Washington High School. He became known for his public speaking ability and was part of the school's debate team. King became the youngest assistant manager of a newspaper delivery station for the Atlanta Journal in 1942 when he was 13. During his junior year, he won first prize in an oratorical contest sponsored by the Negro Elks Club in Dublin, Georgia. A precocious student, he skipped both the ninth and the twelfth grades of high school. At the age of 15, King passed his high school exit exam and entered Morehouse College.

The summer before his last year at Morehouse, in 1947, the 18-year-old King chose to enter the ministry. He had concluded that the church offered the most assuring way to answer "an inner urge to serve humanity."

King became a minster so as to serve humanity.

I thought one entered ministry to serve God?

In 1948, he graduated from Morehouse with a B.A. in sociology and enrolled in Crozer Theological Seminary in Chester, Pennsylvania, from which he graduated with a B.Div. degree in 1951.

King began doctoral studies in systematic theology at Boston University and received his Ph.D. on June 5, 1955, with a dissertation on A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman. Source: Wikipedia

MLK the Plagarist

An academic inquiry in October 1991 concluded that portions of his dissertation had been Plagiarized and he had acted improperly. However, despite its finding, the committee said that “no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree,” an action that the panel said would serve no purpose. The committee also found that the dissertation still "makes an intelligent contribution to scholarship." A letter is now attached to the copy of King's dissertation held in the university library, noting that numerous passages were included without the appropriate quotations and citations of sources. Source: Wikipedia

Martin Luther King Jr and Marxism/Communism

Think of Marxism as the theory and Communism as its practical implementation. Communism is a political system where everyone (except a select few) become one and the same.

Communism aims to establish a classless, egalitarian, stateless society founded on common ownership, and promoting equality and fairness.

Marxism is a philosophy, which bases itself on the materialist interpretation of history. It says that history was driven by the materialistic approach of the people, which means the life of a person was driven by what he needed to survive (neo-Darwinism). The Marxist ideology is to prepare the society for communism.

Marxism views that just as society transformed from feudalism to capitalism, it would transform itself to socialism and eventually to communism. Well, the method by which the transformation takes place is what differentiates the communists from Marxists. The Communists believe that the transformation will take place through revolutionary means.

It is hard to make out a difference between Communism and Marxism. These two are so closely related that it is hard to make a distinction between the two. Communism would not have born without Marxism. Last of all, it can be said that Marxism is the theory and communism is the actual practise. Source

MLK’s Communist Advisors

Bayard Rustin was King’s main advisor and mentor/handler in the late 1950’s. Rustin joined the Young Communist League in 1936 and continued working with the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) until the early 1940’s.

Following directions from the Soviet Union the CPUSA and its members were active in the civil rights movement for African-Americans. Following Stalin’s theory of nationalism the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) favored the creation of a separate nation for African-Americans to be located in the south of the United States. However, after 1941 when Germany invaded the Soviet Union, Stalin ordered the CPUSA to abandon civil rights work and focus on getting the USA into WW2 (that is a topic for another day).

Disillusioned, Rustin began working with members of the Socialist Party instead. Rustin was a homosexual and was arrested in Pasadena, California in 1953 for committing sodomy in a car with two other men. He pleaded guilty to the crime of sex perversion and served 60 days in jail.

Rustin, the Communist and sexual pervert (that was the charge that he plead guilty to in 1953) then becomes Martin Luther King Jr’s #1 mentor and adviser a few years later.

Another one of King’s most trusted advisors was a Jewish New York lawyer named Stanley Levison - he was another leader in the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) in the 1950’s. Yet another of King’s advisors and a director of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference was Jack O’Dell. During the 1950’s O’Dell was a member of the CPUSA.

Both Robert & John Kennedy tried to persuade MLK to separate himself from these communists that held powerful positions within his organization - MLK did not heed the warning.

FBI Wiretaps of Martin Luther King Jr.

On October 10, 1963 Attorney General Robert Kennedy authorized the FBI to begin wiretapping the telephones of the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. Kennedy believed that one of King’s closest advisors was a top-level member of the CPUSA. Robert Kennedy was not a right-wing conservative. The Kennedy brothers were both liberal yet even they decided that the FBI needed to wiretap MLK because of his close connections to known Communists.

What they found in the wiretaps was recordings of King in hotels rooms all over America engaging in orgies with women, many of them prostitutes - while his wife and kids were at home. The media kept portraying King as a Christian pastor, civil rights leader and a moral man when behind closed doors he was anything but.

The audios were labelled obscene rather than classified!

Julia Brown Communist Martin Luther King SteemTruth.jpg

Julia Brown, a Communist in Cleveland for 9 years said the following;

we were told to promote King to unite negroes and whites behind King and turn him into a national hero. We were told to look to King as the leader in this struggle because he was on our side. While I was in the party I learned that King attended a Communist Training School, that several of his aides were communists and that he was funded by Communists and took directions from them. King was one of their biggest heroes. Source:

King at Communist Training School

Communist Training School Donald Lee West Martin Luther King Steemtruth.jpg

King is sitting next to the co-founder of the Highlander School, Donald Lee West. According to information obtained by the FBI, West was the District Director of the Communist Party in North Carolina. In 1961, the state of Tennessee revoked Highlander's charter, and confiscated and auctioned the school's land and property. Source: Wikipeadia

1955 Montgomery Bus Boycott

In March 1955, Claudette Colvin, a black fifteen-year-old schoolgirl in Montgomery, refused to give up her bus seat to a white man in compliance with Jim Crow laws, which were local regulations in the Southern United States that enforced racial segregation.

King was on the committee from the Birmingham African-American community that looked into the case; because Colvin was pregnant and unmarried, E. D. Nixon and Clifford Durrdecided chose to wait for a better case to pursue.

King was Front and Center

On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to give up her seat on a city bus. The Montgomery bus boycott, urged and planned by Nixon and led by King, soon followed.

King Planned the Montgomery Bus Boycott

The boycott lasted for 385 days, and the situation became so tense that King's house was bombed. King was arrested during this campaign, which concluded with a United States District Court ruling in Browder v. Gayle that ended racial segregation on all Montgomery public buses. King's role in the bus boycott transformed him into a national figure and the best-known spokesman of the civil rights movement. Source:

Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)

Martin Luther King Best Friend Abernathy New York Times SteemTruth .jpg
Martin Luther King Best Friend Abernathy 2 New York Times SteemTruth .png

In 1957, King, Ralph Abernathy, Fred Shuttlesworth, Joseph Lowery, and other civil rights activists founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). The group was created to harness the moral authority and organizing power of black churches to conduct nonviolent protests in the service of civil rights reform. One of the group's inspirations was the crusades of evangelist Billy Graham, who befriended King after he attended a Graham crusade in New York City in 1957. King led the SCLC until his death.

In Abernathy’s autobiography And The Walls Came Down it states:

Mr. Abernathy's reasons for providing a detailed description of his friend's last evening and early morning - during which King had sexual encounters with two women and a confrontation with a third close woman companion - can be known only to him. It is sadly ironic that the disclosures will almost surely do more damage to Mr. Abernathy himself than to the reputation of King. Source: New York Times - Dr. King’s Best Friend

MLK Assassination

James Earl Ray SteemTruth.jpg

On April 4, 1963 MLK was allegedly assassinated by James Earl Ray. I say allegedly because James Earl Ray never received a jury trial. Even MLK’s own family believe that Ray was not the killer. MLK’s son went and visited Ray in prison and walked away believing that he was not the killer. King’s son can be seen on numerous tell-a-vision interviews, stating this to be the case and further talking about his meeting with Ray.

According to MLK Jr’s son, Ray pleaded guilty to the murder of MLK because his attorney told him that he had cut a deal with the District Attorney to avoid the death penalty. Unbeknownst to Ray he forfeited his right to a trial and as soon as Ray found out 3 days later he recanted his guilty plea and spent the rest of his life attempting to get a jury trial. He was unsuccessful and died in 1998. In fact, the family of MLK also fought (publicly and privately) for Ray to be given a trial.

If James Earl Ray didn’t kill MLK who did and why? King was a Communist and that made him friends and an asset of the secret cabal that controls the United States. So why did they call kill a friend?

Obama Martin Luther King Memorial Steemtruth.jpg

I believe that they wanted to turn MLK into a martyr, build statues in his honor and name a US National Holiday after him. If he was allowed to live he would have ruined the reputation that he had made for himself and an opportunity would have been missed. All it would have taken was for one prostitute to tell her story or one journalist to spill the beans and MLK’s reputation would have been destroyed.

Whoever took him out chose to take him out while he was at the top of his game, before he got busted or did something so stupid that they could not maintain a media blackout and cover up for him like they had been doing. They took him out so as to immortalize him and haven’t they been very successful at that.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan signed into a law a bill for the creation of Martin Luther King Jr Day. His signature killed two birds (and many more) with one stroke of the pen seeing that Reagan had a tattered civil rights image. Reagan signed the bill but he strongly and publicly opposed the bill yet Congress voted against him, making MLK’s birthday a national holiday.

During the Senate debates those that opposed the MLK holiday brought up the wiretaps of orgies and the fact that he was a Communist. The other side replied with “how dare you run this smear campaign” . Not surprisingly they just wanted to ignore the fact that MLK was a Communist Agent, a Sexual Pervert, a Fraud, a Liar, a Plagarist and a False Prophet!

Today, anyone that says that they don’t like Dr King, (people like me), are accused of being a racist - and by the way - if you don’t like Obama or Oprah you’re also a racist. I don’t have a racist bone in my body but I despise all of them for the damage that they have done in furthering Marxist agendas (knowingly or otherwise).

I do however respect King for the work that he did to end racial serration in the USA. Apartheid was a stain on America that needed to be removed and I’m glad that King and others helped the nation achieve that.

Remember, I’m not judging them on the color of their skin but on the content of their character. People that don’t have any facts want to turn this into a racial issue and divert attention from the evidence.

Martin Luther King Jr. was not a Christian

Martin Luther King, Jr. was a lot of things, but if we take him on the written word of his own testimony, he was not a Christian by biblical definition.

MLK Jr. wrote a large assortment of papers that have been recorded in the online archives of Stanford University. One of those papers is titled An Autobiography of Religious Development and it reveals a plethora of biographical information on King. Following are some direct quotes from that paper:

Martin Luther King Jr. was not Born Again

Conversion for me was never an abrupt something. I have never experienced the so called “crisis moment.” Religion has just been something that I grew up in. Conversion for me has been the gradual intaking of the noble {ideals} set forth in my family and my environment, and I must admit that this intaking has been largely unconscious.” Source: Volume I: Called to Serve

Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. John 3:3

Jesus said that if a man is not born again he cannot enter the kingdom of God. On this point alone MLK was not a Christian, but there’s more.

Martin Luther King Jr. Denied Jesus Rose from the Dead

At the age of 13 I shocked my Sunday School class by denying the bodily resurrection of Jesus. From the age of thirteen on doubts began to spring forth unrelentingly. At the age of fifteen I entered college and more and more could I see a gap between what I had learned in Sunday School and what I was learning in college. This conflict continued until I studied a course in Bible in which I came to see that behind the legends and myths of the Book were many profound truths which one could not escape.

The last doctrine in our discussion deals with the resurrection story. This doctrine, upon which the Easter Faith rests, symbolizes the ultimate Christian conviction: that Christ conquered death. From a literary, historical, and philosophical point of view this doctrine raises many questions.6 In fact the external evidence for the authenticity of this doctrine is found wanting. But here again the external evidence is not the most important thing, for it in itself fails to tell us precisely the thing we most want to know: What experiences of early Christians lead to the formulation of the doctrine? The root of our inquiry is found in the fact that the early Christians had lived with Jesus. They had been captivated by the magnetic power of his personality. This basic experience led to the faith that he could never die. Source

Martin Luther King Jr Denied the Virgin Birth

First we must admit that the evidence for the tenability of this doctrine is to shallow to convince any objective thinker. To begin with, the earliest written documents in the New Testament make no mention of the virgin birth. Moreover, the Gospel of Mark, the most primitive and authentic of the four, gives not the slightest suggestion of the virgin birth. The effort to justify this doctrine on the grounds that it was predicted by the prophet Isaiah is immediately eliminated, for all New Testament scholars agree that the word virgin is not found in the Hebrew original, but only in the Greek text which is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word for “young woman.” How then did this doctrine arise? A clue to this inquiry may be found in a sentence from St. Justin’s First Apology. Here Justin states that the birth of Jesus is quite similar to the birth of the sons of Zeus. It was believed in Greek thought that an extraordinary person could only be explained by saying that he had a father who was more than human. It is probable that this Greek idea influenced Christian thought.

Martin Luther King Jr. Call to Ministry was Not to Serve God

I had felt the urge to enter the the ministry from my latter high school days, but accumulated doubts had somewhat blocked the urge. Now it appeared again with an inescapable drive. My call to the ministry was not a miraculous or supernatural something, on the contrary it was an inner urge calling me to serve humanity.

Martin Luther King Jr. Denied a Literal Interpretation of the Bible

As stated above, my college training, especially the first two years, brought many doubts into my mind. It was at this period that the shackles of fundamentalism were removed from my body. This is why, when I came to Crozer, I could accept the liberal interpretation with relative ease.

Martin Luther King Jr. Denied the Deity of Jesus Christ

The first doctrine of our discussion which deals with the divine sonship of Jesus went through a great process of development. It seems quite evident that the early followers of Jesus in Palestine. We may find a partial clue to the actual rise of this doctrine in the spreading of Christianity into the Greco-Roman world. Through philosophical thinking the Greeks came to the point of subordinating, distrusting, and even minimizing anything physical. Anything that possessed flesh was always undermined in Greek thought. And so in order to receive inspiration from Jesus the Greeks had to apotheosize him. Source

The church found Jesus divine because they had found God in him. They could only identify him with the highest and best in the universe. It was this great experience with the historical Jesus that led the early christians to see him as the divine son of God. Source

That Christianity did copy and borrow from Mithraism cannot be denied, but it was generally a natural and unconscious process rather than a deliberate plan of action. It was subject to the same influences from the environment as were the other cults. Source: A Study of Mithraism - MLK

MLK called Christianity a cult. Then why call yourself a Baptist Pastor Dr. King?

MLK called himself a Christian to further his political and activist ambitions. It had nothing to do with Christianity and religion and everything to do with giving him a platform and soapbox to spread his message of equality in Christian dominated USA.

The bible calls people that deny the doctrine of Christ False Prophets and that is exactly what MLK was. People may argue that MLK was a great civil rights leader, great orator, a great man and that he fought for a lot of great causes.

Others may say, we didn’t look up to him as a spiritual leader or a pastor so who cares if he denied the bible and teachings of Jesus? We are just looking at him as a champion of political issues so what he believed about Jesus is not the issue. Well here’s the problem with that - Martin Luther King Jr was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and was a Baptist pastor who in the eyes of the world was a devout Christian.

MLK was a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing - A Ravening Wolf

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Matthew 7:15

This is what the Bible says about False Prophets and ain’t it true with MLK!

Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children: Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness; 2 Peter:2:14-15

FBI’s Poison Letter to Martin Luther King

Poison Letter Excerpt 2 Martin Luther King SteemTruth.png

Hoover and the Feds seem to have been genuinely shocked by King’s behavior. Here was a minister, the leader of a moral movement, acting like “a tom cat with obsessive degenerate sexual urges,” Hoover wrote on one memo. In response, F.B.I. officials began to peddle information about King’s hotel-room activities to friendly members of the press, hoping to discredit the civil rights leader. To their astonishment, the story went nowhere. If anything, as the F.B.I. learned more about his sexual adventures, King only seemed to be gaining in public stature. In 1964, the Civil Rights Act passed Congress, and just a few months later King became the youngest man ever to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Source: New York Times

Poison Letter FBI Martin Luther King SteemTruth.jpg

Media blackout about MLK’s sexual liaisons and soon after King receives the Nobel Peace Prize.

And some people still believe that media blackouts are a ‘conspiracy theory’ without precedence or evidence!

The media is controlled by outside influences, they are not independent in any way shape or form - they are propaganda publishing houses, period!

The media were given orders not to print stories about King’s sexual activities.

These are facts, not conspiracies. Martin Luther King was a Communist, an Adulterer, a Plagiarist, a Fraud, a Liar and a False Prophet - but other than that he was a great guy.

We must ask ourselves why does a man like MLK have a National Holiday named after him and a Nobel Peace Prize?

Do not blindly believe anything that you have ever been told.

To know the truth you must seek it and it is a journey worth taking.

Martin Luther King, Jr. did many good things. MLK stood against racism and intolerance, which I applaud. It absolutely disgusts me that any one race could ever think they were better than any other race based solely on skin color. MLK advocated, like Gandhi, non-violent protest and resistance to injustice. I applaud that as well. But sadly, MLK, though he is known as a Baptist preacher, was never Baptist in his doctrine and did not preach salvation by faith through grace alone in Jesus Christ which is the hallmark of any Christian preacher over the last 2,000 years. Source: PAPERS WRITTEN BY MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. REVEAL HE WAS NOT A CHRISTIAN


I know that this may be difficult to read and cognitive dissonance may have already set in. I would encourage to do the research for yourself and arrive at your own conclusions.

Thank you for reading my post on Marxist Lucifer King.

If you seek Truth you have found a home!

Enjoy what’s left of Marxist Lucifer King Day!

Till next time..

Yours in Freedom & Truth Health


Images: 1 2 3 4


Great research as always mate.
Everything most people believe is a false narrative such is the bang up job executed by the security services in the last 70 years.
I wonder how the world will view another Marxist, Barack Obama (Barry Soetoro) in the future? Another man controlled by the hidden hand, given a Nobel Peace prize and lauded by many as a hero. interesting parallel. I doubt there will ever be a BHO day though, unless of course they decide to whack him too!
The truth will be a bitter pill for many.
A brave post @steemtruth

Barack was actually in the National Socialist part of Illinois. It's crazy. No one wants to talk about such things though and the direct links to the Fascists.

yea Obama was groomed at a young age by the Fabian Society, who literally has the "wolf in sheeps clothing" as their logo

The Coefficients was a monthly dining club founded in 1902 by the Fabian campaigners Sidney and Beatrice Webb as a forum for British socialist reformers and imperialists of the Edwardian era.[1] The name of the dining club was a reflection of the group's focus on "efficiency".[2]

Wow, I hate these people. "Efficiency?" I'm better than you, and I know how to make the world more efficient... by force.

Sic semper tyrannis!

Yeah, while this is happening in the way of subtle, yet coercive, ways of shaping our agency by limiting our physical freedom they are doing the same with the mind. I have read many an article lately advocating for the limitations of free will and though, all for the great goal of "efficiency". Behaviourism for a supposed higher purpose . It's interesting because most ideology on the left and right push for that through private or public means. The idealism of "The Great Work" of the Masons as laid out in Morals and Dogma suggests an efficient allocation of force in order to great a harmonious society. The contradiction inevitably arises that if such in authority are not in harmony with themselves how can one be trusted to impose it on others. The very presence of authority, especially on a larger scale seems contradictory to the concept of harmony because force should not be present in the face of harmony. Then we are left with anarchy, which paradoxically, in its most beautiful form, as a response to and transcendant from authoritative society seems to be the dream going forward. But of course, I don't doubt paradox will inevitably reveal itself again.

Why Did Obama call his wife Michael a few times ?accident ? Or was it an accident

As I was writing it the parallels with Obama were obvious but as you say - he will never reach the lofty heights that MLK did. The world is a stage and almost everything that most people believe to be true is false.

Thanks @tremendospercy and a brave comment on your part!

@steemtruth - Very well put together article, I learned so much. I can't think of a more effective way to tackle a very difficult and controversial topic. Big ups for your bravery by attempting to bring this information to light. I know you were subtle about the cabal that serves as the shadow government, media, etc on this planet - we know who they are. It can be frustrating but one truth at a time..

Certainly evidence that official history only records one side of the story and from this perspective the world is a theater. Whilst reading this I'm also reminded of Nelson Mandela, a man that went on to achieve much good and turn the other cheek, but whom equally had many aspects of his life hidden from public consumption. Equally, despite his achievements King appears to have been used to create a wider narrative and cement avenues of thought & ideology that many people will be unaware of. Great research as always my friend.

Per usual, very well said @perceptualflaws. I agree with you - Mandela was another actor that was elevated to a status that he did not deserve. You can put Gandhi and Mother Teresa in the same basket. The darker sides of these people's past are ignored while the good deeds they did are blown out of proportion. I see this pattern repeating itself over and over. It's a shame that so many people fall for it.

Excellent article, if you've done your job. I already knew that MLK was a Marxist, but I did not know there was so much evidence about it. In the same way, before knowing that he was a Marxist, I also supported his cause, and like everyone else, I made quotes from him, then not anymore.

Well I can honestly say I have never heard this side to the story, not even close!! I've read before some pretty crazy stuff about Gandhi, and Mother Teresa, but never MLK jr...

When the world elevates a person like MLK (and others) to hero, iconic status and build statues and create national holidays, name libraries and other buildings after them it is usually a good signal that there is an agenda behind it. That is not necessarily a blanket rule but it's a hint that needs further investigating. I think the media blackouts, Nobel Peace Prize etc support the conclusion that powerful men inside the USA were behind the elevation of MLK to cult status. This is by design, not coincidence.

I believe that his links to communism cannot be disputed and we should all know who has controlled the Soviet Union and Communism since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. It is just another piece of the puzzle that is leading us towards living in a global communist regime at some future date. Cultural Marxism has a lot to answer for and King played a very important role in furthering this agenda.

To be fair how much he knew and what he actually believed re: marxism/communism I have not yet found out but I am yet to look.

Yeah, he's not the hero he's made out to be.

I know the FBI had done cointelpro on MLK. Great post!

Head blown. In fairness, it's not a subject I've ever really looked deeply into, other than seeing quotes here and there on line. As such, I'm definitely not qualified to comment. I always saw him as a force for human rights, from what little I knew, and if good came of it, then that is at least something. I'll be looking at this post again, when I've got a little more time to follow the links, but it's definitely piqued my interest. Things are never black and white, and I'm a great believer in the idea that no man is truly good or wholly evil.....more like the yin/Yang principal. Certainly food for thought though, thank you.

King certainly did a lot to improve the lives of African-Americans. That should not be forgotten. However his other deeds should also be remembered. That is the only way that we can try to get a more complete picture of the man. When we look at his good deeds we should also peel back the layers to see where his ideologies came from. I believe that they stem from Marxist ideology and that isn't good. How much King knew about the 'big picture' I am not sure. I haven't dived much deeper than what I shared in this post. Thanks for being open-minded.

You're right. I think it's a question of perspective. Dig deep enough and all idols have feet of clay, but it shouldn't change the good they do. None of the political models have proved to be effective whether socialism or capitalism, there will always be those hungry for power or control and history has proven all systems vulnerable to these. Until we evolve as a species we will continue to replace one flawed, corrupted ideology with another.

Yep, we are presented with different political and social models but they are all constructs that derive from the same group. They should all be scratched and we should start again.

Another great thought provoking post. Although I had read that MLK was a womaniser & not the saint he was made out to be, I had not considered the communist link. Is anything we believe real? I'm scared to read your future posts now in case you ruin Malcolm X for me too :-). Good work!!

Almost everything that we have been told is a lie to varying degrees. Some stories are outright lies while other stories are very one-sided, and/or omit elements of their lives that do not support the public persona that is being promoted.

This seems to the case with MLK. The media blackouts about his sexual shenanigans support the notion that powerful interests within, and/or controlling the US Gov't wanted him to reach cult, martyrdom status and it seems that they got what they wanted.

Personally, I don't believe anything that I haven't researched for myself. I choose to sit on the fence and admit that I don't know enough on the topic before I have personally checked for myself. Malcom X falls into that category for me so your safe for the time being ;)

Thanks @jimbobbill

Wow. Powerful article. I've always thought MLK was a phony communist and just a mascot for the liberals to parade around. Malcom X on the other hand, actually cared about his people and understood that liberals were the true enemy of blacks. My research on Malcolm X shows that he opposed liberalism, and his actual ideology was far more comparable to what has been dubbed the "Alt Right" in that he believed nationalism (black nationalism in his case) was the path forward.

I haven't researched Malcolm X but I like what he said in the video. Thanks for reading the article and commenting.

Your posts are amazing - I didn't like Barry Soetoro or Oprah
either and now I also don't like this guy - I'm thinking about joining the KKK because I'm racist :)

Thank you for writing us an informed article. I can't believe my school brainwashed me into thinking he was a hero. I got interested in MLK after the JFK files were released. So far this is the best article I've read.

Thank you for reading it and commenting @guernicamikan

None of this information is new or hidden by anyone. It's been around for a very long time....It was spread by the same people who wanted him dead....cointelpro whom you ask? The CIA....Are you a CIA agent?

I can't recall saying that it was hidden information. I did say that powerful people were successful in stopping most American citizens learning about the other King via e.g. a media blackout. If you were to survey the world, even just America I'm quite sure that only a relatively small number of people are aware of what I shared in the post.

How can it be disinformation when the papers that King himself published denied the deity of Jesus? These were his own words and what it seems he believed. If he didn't believe he was lying and if he did believe it he was also lying. There is no wriggle for King on this one. King pretended to be a Baptist pastor and introduce God into the narrative when it suited him. That makes him a liar, fraud, false prophet and hypocrite (that is the content of his character, at least on this issue). Do you believe that the CIA wrote those papers and published them under King's name?

Do you deny that King's mentors, closest advisors etc were not Communists?

Do you deny that King was an adulterer and sexual pervert?

If the CIA were really out to get King they would have exposed him as Hoover threatened to do - but they didn't and neither did the government or the media.

CIA agents don't normally expose people and psyops like Assange, Snowden, MLK, Putin, Trump, Clinton etc as controlled opposition but that is exactly what I have done in my posts. Just scroll down my page to see what I've written.

The ridiculously long reply, proves that you have been completely brainwashed by deep state bullshit....the source material you have used throughout your article is complete jibberish hogwash ranting from anti-communist, religious zealot bible bashing idiots, deep state agents who pose as 'journalists' and establishment figures who all wanted him dead. None of these disinfo agents source to ANYTHING but the garbage that the FBI and CIA published.

I am not defending the man himself, instead I am discrediting your article because it's horrible , falsified in so many ways and your sources are ridiculously laughable. Your sources come from the very people who killed him....Get that through your thick skull.

@Steemtruth Hey Pali, we meet again. Palikari123 is obviously some sort of Russian/Communist troll agent, sent to harass anti-Communists and deny Communism, etc. He does the same things to other Steemians. I was caught offguard, took me a few minutes to figure it out, never been harassed by such an aggressive Russian/Pro-Communist troll or really knew they infiltrated social media/Internet. My guess is is crawling/infested with them.

i never seen Such a leader like Martin Luther

He was a socialist, but not a communist. But to be fair, "capitalism" meant corporate collusion with government, and socialism is presented as the only alternative in the standard false dichotomy of popular economic understanding.

His sexual escapades have no relevance to the truth or falsehood of his arguments. Remember Romans 3:23? All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Sins should be called out, but it's a basic principle of rational discourse to avoid attacking the character of a speaker and instead directly address the argument presented.

If he was a false prophet, what did he prophesy? How specifically was the core principle that all men are equal before God a false teaching?

He wasn't a saint. He was misguided politically and economically. Government holidays are an absurdity in the first place. But I think your post fails to support its initial assertions.


Crazy world out there!
Everything seems like a lie and one big experiment
Lies when we are kids
All through school
TV -the news
"PROGRAMS" we watch
Drug thugs
Tooth fairy
Etc etc

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.07
JST 0.027
BTC 28439.32
ETH 1825.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.76