Dangerous Debate

in informationwar •  2 months ago 

Freedom of speech is a great good. But it's actually also weird to have to define it as a "right." It seems to me that freedom of speech just is. On the other hand there isn't. And that's how it should be. Confusing?

Image by Global X - source: Flickr

Yes, it is confusing indeed to think or talk about something so mundane, yet so controversial. I'm used to saying what I think but I also know that there are things I can not say; some speech is indefensible. Speech invokes thoughts and ideas, and those inform actions; as such speech can have an immediate and dramatic effect on how we function in society. A simple and clear example of indefensible speech is crying "FIRE!!" in a filled cinema or "BOMB!!" in the mall on Saturday afternoon, especially when people get hurt and trampled in the panic that's likely to ensue...

Generally though, freedom of speech is a good thing, except when you start to translate it as a "right to insult," which it is not. Sure, there's always a danger that someone gets insulted, in even the most polite of discussions; there has to be room for insult, for sure, or discussions between believers and non believers wouldn't be possible, humor would be boring and so on. But speech can harm individuals as well as groups and it's clearly not alright to deliberately use your freedom of speech with the aim of harming other people. In Trump's case there's no proving if he does something deliberately or not, you never know when a clown's joking or not, but he regularly says racist things and under his "reign" racists are becoming more open about their racism. Although they often still use scientific sounding terms like "race realism" when they try to explain why white people are smarter than dark skinned people. And then they say it's not white supremacy because they also say that Asian people are smarter than white people... See? It's all science, nothing racist at all...

Free speech is important; we need to be allowed to exchange as wide a variety of ideas as possible, share as much information from every viewpoint available on shared platforms. I deliberately use the term "shared platforms" as opposed to the much more popular "marketplace of ideas" because the latter is anti-democratic. Hold on. Let me explain. Markets are places where we compete. The marketplace of ideas is the idea that opinions are pitted against each other for one to eventually prevail. The click-bait sensationalist culture we witness online is the result of this philosophy, and all in line with the dogma of our era, which is capitalism. The currency in the marketplace of ideas is not "goodness" of "validity" or "truth"; the currency in this marketplace is "attention." Competing ideas fight over your and my attention and goodness, validity and truth are all subservient to the ultimate goal of gaining attention.

Debate is sometimes good, but discussions are better, they don't need a winner and allow all participating parties to incorporate all other opinions into their own world-view without having to concede a "loss." That's how democracy is supposed to work; for a large group of individuals to bundle their forces behind common goals, consensus should be what we aim for, not increased adversary. But, like I said at the start, some speech is intended to divide, to insult, to marginalize, and none more so than the rhetoric pouring over the lips of rising extreme right wing nationalists gaining popularity all over the western world. Debating them seems like a good idea and is done with the best of intentions, but it often isn't such a good idea. I mean, when someone says that race X is better or smarter than race Y, that person is ignorant, willingly or by accident, or that person is lying. Debating a willful lier has no purpose; they'll keep lying no matter what you say. And since their starting point is a lie, they won't be interested in hearing truths that contradict their misguided opinions, and you'll be giving them a platform to spread even more lies.

Also, debating racists and fascists creates the appearance of two equally valid opinions to be presented. Just like debates between creationists and people who consider the theory of evolution to be true, it says to the audience: "here's two ideas, you've heard the pros and cons, now go and form your own opinion." That kind of "fair and balanced" reporting is in itself unfair and unbalanced; slap the label of "expert" on two opposing guests and reap the sensationalist fruits from an engrossed audience. Debating can be good, but isn't always, and isn't necessary to point out the obvious untruths espoused by white nationalists, race-realists or creationists. Freedom of speech is like all other freedoms; it comes with a modicum of responsibility to use it wisely and to be informed. Freedom in itself is a concept we're thoroughly unfamiliar with and scares us at the same time it attracts us. Freedom can only be enjoyed together, unless you're talking about the kind of freedom of a hermit, away from the rest of humanity, and that's not freedom at all. Just some thoughts, do with them as you please, dear reader. I hope it'll make you think about what freedom of speech is to you...

Sam Harris, Race Science, and Nerd Logic (Podcast Teaser)

Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep steeming!

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>Police Debunked
The Life GiverGlobal Dilemma
Demonizing The ImmigrantLe Mans 1956
School DebunkedPerseverance Porn

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented. If you would like to be scouted for @helpie , please drop a comment on THIS POST or contact @paintingangels on discord at paintingangels(serena)#3668.

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:

Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO

wave-13 divider odrau steem

@helpie is a WITNESS now! So please help @helpie help you by voting for us here!Helpie_01.png

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations! I just stopped by to say that your post has been selected as a daily Featured Post of my personal curation project! You can find the daily Featured Post HERE.
I upvoted your contribution and I put it on the list because to my mind your post is what I call a quality content!
I am @miti, a manual curator that shall make available all his Steem Power to authors deserving of support. Let's make STEEM great again!
Have a nice day and keep up the good work!

Hi @zyx066!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.853 which ranks you at #4734 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 2 places in the last three days (old rank 4732).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 134 contributions, your post is ranked at #72.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • You have already shown user engagement, try to improve it further.

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server