Most real scientists are offended by the pseudo-science that supports man made global warming.

Where to begin? The data used to support man made global warming is full of irregularities, measurement errors, unsupported projections, and some deliberate falsifications. I was greatly concerned by the coming Ice age in the 1970s. I was just beginning my life using science, and did not understand that data and analysis could be MADE to lie! I studied how we could survive such a catastrophic event! That scared the feces out of me!

Now they are using the exact same data, to project a Global catastrophe...from heating! But now I know that data manipulation is a tool for pseudo-scientists, who sell themselves for money! So these Scientific prostitutes need to be de-funded, and professionally punished, before they harm the reputations of honest scientists; and destroy our lives!

Here is a youtube video from an Honest scientist, commenting on this pseudo-science:

There is a cult growing around man made global warming. It is focussed on stopping all debate, because debate will show this scientific melon to be totally rotten! They make errors I would have been flunked for my freshman year; and since they know these errors are used to change the data.

The single most difficult thing to do in science, is to correctly analyze data, with out injecting personal bias.

Here is a good writeup from Princeton on this bad science:
https://www.libertyvideonews.com/princeton-physicist-theres-a-cult-forming-around-climate-scientists/

They call this a cult, and I think that is accurate, as cults believe by faith alone; and there is no truth here! These people have enough training not to make such simple mistakes, hence the pseudo-science, and the cult rating!

From the Scientific Laboratory I personally respect the most, Sandia Labs:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/25/lindzen-at-sandia-national-labs-climate-models-are-flawed/

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Richard Lindzen, a global warming skeptic, told about 70 Sandia researchers in June that too much is being made of climate change by researchers seeking government funding. He said their data and their methods did not support their claims.

This MAN is a Scientist, and is 100% correct! Just the basic problems with the data are damning!

Sandia Labs called NASA to task for their Kindergarten science. They were pretty brutal, and chastised NASA for their data collection methods (listed in #3 below).

They are:

1. The measurements are not normalized for solar changes. If you do not record and mathematically remove variations in the source of heat, in a thermal calculation; the results are garbage; using the GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out) Rule
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_in,_garbage_out

2. Measurement accuracy claims are freshman mistakes level. They make claims for accuracy from a hundred years ago of several decimal places; using glass thermometers. They were accurate to 1 degree, so claiming several decimal places is presumptive and bogus!

3. Modern measurement digital equipment environmental problems. Modern electronics use a reference junction temperature inside the unit as a comparative reference. For high accuracy measurements this junction is held in a internal over held to as tight temperature. The one I have contains an oven is set at 150 degrees. The data collected by NASA was collected in Antarctica using a non compensated temperature meter. NASA Knows this too, and they did this to get some more shuttle flights authorized. Then BHO retired all the shuttles in payment for this bad science, and ordered NASA to list the scientific contributions muslims made to science. NASA, hows that for a payoff for pseudo-science working for you?

4. They made a computer model for thermal projection that does not include the oceans, that cover 2/3rds of the planet; and are the best heat sink known to man. They claimed it was difficult to model....bad science!

5. The claim is that Carbon Dioxide is the bogeyman in global warming. This is called a control variable in a process, where you change that variable, and the output of the process changes directly. This control variable is identified by graphing the data. In something this complex the graph is a 3-D plot, and the closer the variable is to the plotted process line, the more control that variable has on this process! Enter the global temperature plot, and find CO2 on the plot. You will find CO2 far from the process line! This means it is an outlier, which means it has minimal effect on the process you want to control.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlier

6. A variable that is involved in a process that is in a feedback system, is a self correcting variable. CO2 is a feedback variable; since if it rises, plants will grow and consume the CO2. Then the CO2 will drop under the increased plant respiration. This problem is self limiting, by definition; and controls NOTHING!

7. The amount of CO2 they are projecting in this doomsday scenario is more CO2 than exists on this planet. We would need to import CO2 to hit these levels. BAD-SCIENCE offends me!

The only reason for this pseudo-science is someone figured out how to make money taxing CO2 emissions! It has NOTHING to do with fixing global temperatures, it is the biggest theft ever attempted!