Image source

Breaking News, Breaking News

Although this story broke out a few days ago whereby it was confirmed that Google and Youtube use a combination of AI Algorithm programming and outright selective censorship of non left-leaning voices, it is worthwhile noting that not a single peep has been uttered by the MSM (with the usual suspects of CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, Washington Post, Huffington Post). Only RT has carried the story from the major news outlets.

Of course, this comes as no surprise since the MSM are also highly complicit in such censorship efforts as well as for pushing left-leaning agendas and propaganda.

The highly revealing exposé, one of many over the last couple of years (including one on CNN, another on The New York Times, as well as Twitter), show the extent to which Google and YouTube tweak their algorithms to forego truth and fairness in favor of left-leaning political bias.

Moreover, it is being exposed that they are once again meddling in US Elections by playing favorites, or attacking undesirable such as Trump, as is revealed when one executive spills the beans as to how precisely what they are doing everything to prevent another "Trump situation".

The executive in question is Jen Gennai.

Google's highly left-leaning executive Jen Gennai, image source ZeroHedge

Although YouTube has memory-holed Project Veritas' video, it can still be viewed from the following sources:

• The official Project Veritas website: Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam
• via Bitchute
• via vimeo

Highlights from the Project Veritas video - focus on GOOGLE:

The 25-minute video rips apart Google from the inside - by both current exec Jen Gennai and a former executive turned whistleblower that gave frightening details as to the AI mechanics and secret internal policies used to effectively make them selective content pushers, propagandists, and left-leaning agenda supporters.

Here are selected highlights & screenshots from the video exposé:

• First, Google exec Jen Gennai who is 'Head of Responsible Innovation' shows her and Google's idea of "fairness" which is basically that whoever voted for Trump don't live up to their standard:
  

• Gennai goes on to explain how Google "trains" their algorithms as to not have a similar outcome to the 2016 election:
  

• At the 00:57 mark, the whistleblower reveals how Google is a HIGHLY BIASED POLITICAL MACHINE that is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump getting come to power again

• Gennai, at 01:03 then elaborating on how Google has been working hard since 2016 (over 2 years) to make sure that they get their desired outcome for 2020 (whoever that candidate may be, certainly not Trump):
  

(side note: it's incredible how the MSM has pushed the Russiagate election meddling fairy tale since 2016 whilst all along an American corporation has been actually doing a highly covert and extensive meddling campaign; it makes you wonder who is really in charge...)

• Right after that, Gennai brags about how even the US Congress cannot change their ways.

• Around the 2:00 mark, a segment commences regarding "Machine Learning Fairness" which is Google algorithmic way of defining hate speech, demoting content based on keywords and audio (of YouTube videos) along with pushing MSM news in lieu of other outlets and channels (especially conservative and right-leaning ones). This segment begins with a hint of how another whistleblower who has previously employed at Pinterest as he explains how they censor content related to "Pro-Life" and Christian contents. But the focus shits back to "getting rid" of hate speech through "unfairness"; the whistleblower revealingly states the following:

What they're really saying about fairness is that they have to manipulate their search results so that it gives them their political agenda that they want. And so, they have to re-bias their algorithms so that they can get their agendas across.

• At around 07:18, Project Veritas' founder and interviewer James O'Keefe put Google's AI "Machine Learning Fairness" to the test. He types in Google (to find out what it will suggest with its 'auto-complete' feature): "men can" and the results are quite obvious for all to see:

I tried the very [same search] today (June 26, 2019) which produced very similar results:

As per these suggested search phrases, it is not difficult to see what kind of left-leaning agendas they are intentionally (ad perhaps subliminally) trying to push on the masses.

The whistleblower suggests that these answers are integral to the Social Justice narrative rather than what people are actually searching for; in other words, the source of truth has been vandalized.

• At 08:34 Project Veritas explores some of Google's internal (confidential) documents beginning with one that covers the "algorithmic unfairness" guidelines.

• At 10:38 the whistleblower discusses an internal document with the O'Keefe whereby he clarifies the spirit of some of the text:

When they mean single point of truth, what they mean is alignment with the narrative. The narrative is manufactured by the establishment players; and what they're looking to do is to boost authoritative content.

This statement is confirmed by what Ms. Gennai stated in the undercover interview where she states that they choose who they define as "credible news sources":

It is worthy to note that such an affirmation places Google as a content publisher rather than a platform and thus puts them in clear violation of current US regulatory laws - specifically Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The whistleblower once again confirms that Google does indeed have an editorial agenda, a clear violation of US law.

To further confirm Google's political left-leaning bias (i.e., pro-Democrat) O'Keefe types the following text ("Hillary Clinton's emails are") into the search engine to see what happens:

and...nada! Nothing, not a single link appears as suggested search results. In other words, Google is suggesting that there is no relevant data. Yet we know that since 2016 many people have made such searches. And the whistleblower proves it with another of Google's very own products, namely Google Trends:

Et voila!

Note that further below in this email I've included a full video that exposes previous Hillary Clinton bias on the part of Google during the 2016 US Presidential Election.

Highlights from the Project Veritas video - focus on YOUTUBE:

At around the 19:42 mark into the video the focus shifts to YouTube which is owned by Google and is the largest and most influential video platform in the world.

The insider whistleblower confirms political bias is also present and censoring voices on YouTube. At a special meeting whereby YouTube personnel were talking about the future of the company, they described that they were going to have more content filtering. And right after that happened, a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, the insider asserts further specifying that they mostly target right-wing news commentators.

He goes on to state how they technically can do this (given the huge number of content creators), namely through AI, algorithms, voice translators, and punitive ranking systems.

YouTube is essentially deciding which contents users are allowed to see, is additionally confirmed by the insider.

When asked by O'Keefe what is scary to him about all this, the whistleblower answers:

What scary is Google is deciding what's important and what's not important. They are going through and effectively deleting conversations from the national narrative. It reminds me of a book called 1984.

And that should be a warning. 1984 should not be a user manual on how to run society. And Google is falling directly into that trap when they're deciding what gets read, what gets consumed, what we're able to click on, what appears...ah..you know, it reminds me a lot of facism. It's not just about burning books. When videos get pulled off of a platform, that's also a form of censorship.

Her Side of the Story...(to be fair, eh?)

Following the steaming exposé, Ms. Gennai (assuming that is her preferred pronoun) took to her medium.com account to [try] explain herself (alternatelink herein case this one also gets deleted).

Here are a few quotes from her rebuttal [Emphasis Added]:

Unfortunately, I now know that these people lied about their true identities, filmed me without my consent, selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my words and the actions of my employer, and published it widely online.

Well. Nice try. "Selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my own words and actions of my employer" is what she said, yet the evidence provided by Project Veritas as stated above as well as the words uttered from her own mouth indisputably confirms otherwise.

...they wanted someone who would give them juicy soundbites about tech’s alleged bias against conservatives.

Indirectly - when speaking of a Never Trump situation in 2020 - you certainly have appeared to have done so.

Project Veritas has edited the video to make it seem that I am a powerful executive who was confirming that Google is working to alter the 2020 election.

To be fair, that could be correct. But one has to wonder how many others (hundreds?, thousands?) of low-, mid-, and high-level executives at Google have left-leaning bias, are also working on 2020 election interference, and are helping to censor the voice of countless conservatives and right-wingers.

The video then goes on to stitch together a series of debunked conspiracy theories about our search results, and our other products. Google has repeatedly been clear that it works to be a trustworthy source of information, without regard to political viewpoint. In fact, Google has no notion of political ideology in its rankings.

Sorry. Lies, lies, and more lies. Everything in Project Veritas exposé (I love that word exposé, as it reveals the truth, or real situation about things) and what appears in this post (especially the video below) confirms otherwise, Ms. Gennai.

Although I didn't see any mention of Ms. Gennai having a Twitter account in any of the linked references from this post, I couldn't help but to wonder if she did and what juicy tweets would appear therein. Thus, I expressly decided to look it up directly on Twitter and also through a Google search. While the former didn't yield such a user, the latter confirmed that a Twitter account with the name gennai_jen did indeed exist (at least until a few days ago) on Twitter. Here is a screenshot of the Google search which confirms it (unless these are more "fabricated" results from the tech giant):

I am not sure whether she decided to promptly delete her Twitter account or was forced into doing so by her employer; but what remains clear is that what she revealed is not something Google and other tech giants such as Twitter want appearing in a non-Orwellian, uncontrolled, internet space.

It will be interesting to see if Google comes forward with an official statement regarding Ms. Gennai's comments and the other revelations leaked in the Veritas exposé.

My guess is that, like with the presstitute members of the MSM, they will keep it as hush as possible.

Google's previous track record...

It's worth noting that the company's motto use to be "Do no evil."; but this is officially no longer their maxim, and rightfully so, as the shit they've been up to in the past several years is nothing short of insidious.

Google does have an established track record of political meddling and favoritism.

During the 2016 US Presidential Elections they, along with Alphabet's (Google's parent company) and Bilderberg participant Eric Schmidt (the former CEO) was not only on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's team of advisors, but he made sure that the number one search engine in the world was rigged in her favor and against that of her main competitor Donald Trump.

If you haven't seem the June 2016 exposé by Matt Lieberman on this, you can watch it hereunder, as it is extremely revealing in and of itself:

I could go on with countless examples of Google and YouTube's nefarious activities over the past several years, but I will suffice it to include just a few which I have covered in my Steemit blog. Here they are:

• YouTube promoting and monetizing Child Porn while censoring those trying to fight against it...Pure Evil

• "Want To Freak Yourself Out?" Here Is All The Personal Data That Facebook/Google Collect (ZeroHedge)

• Google-Facebook-Twitter: Attack dogs of the Deep State Censoring Dissenters & Crushing Cryptos

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In conclusion, even apart from this Project Veritas exposé we have clearly seen that both Google and YouTube (not to mention peer giant tech firms Facebook and Twitter) have been extremely active in rigging content, pushing left-leaning narratives, censoring, voices, political meddling, breaking numerous laws, and acting as the arbiters of truth for society.

Given what we know, a few questions come to mind. First, to what extent will they [illegally] continue to interfere in the 2020 US Presidential election? Will they get caught yet again? Will other whistleblowers and leaks surface? Also, who exactly is behind these agendas swaying these tech giants to such extremes? Will anyone ever get punished or be held accountable? Will an incompetent and inept Congress do anything about it? (Personally, I wouldn't hold my breath...)

So what can we the little people do about it?

Stop using their products! There are much better alternatives. duckduckgo.com is a much better search engine which doesn't censor search results like Google does. Migrate from YouTube to Bitchute and other video sharing platforms.

Image source

These tech giants have sold their souls and decided to go in one direction - that with the evil and dark forces of the powers-that-shouldn't-be. We need to move in the opposite direction, one soul at a time...

Spread far and wide, please re-steem.

Peace all.

In Truth & Liberty,

@libertyacademy