On doing rhetoric arguments in the talking and the conviction; Are we stronger and better in communication when doing these things?
You know, you and I are as we are due to what we have learned of all the courses we have had in schools. And if we are the BEST, we should go and attend the BEST studies at the planet, where we can use our brains to develop ourselves properly in all ways with cognitions, emotions and actions.
So, when we are talking! What are we using of tactics of competing out the opposition independently and regardless of what is happening? We should have the best arguments in the communciation, and often we must use history and politics about how to frame the world, and understand what is coming from time to time. And being fresh in nature and being the best in schools at every level, that is the way we should perceive life when all things are happening as they occur!
What is really MIT and all the things that are happening there from time to time, and from place to place? The candidates are better than many other people, and we must understand many of the variants of theory, methods and data to be engaged in forming the environments, and using our human nature in the nature, and many things are about perception, and before, immediately and after the situtions were occurring we are trying to explain what the phenomenon really was. And at every time, we are there, even at Harvard! And professor Michael E. Porter was telling me in a mail that I should attend the doctoral studies at Harvard, and that was a nice message! Thank you!
We are really dwelling and thinking about what communication and messages and history are doing with us at any places in the world. And there should be a philosophy of what we are doing, and we should reveal what is going everywhere, and why things are as they are. And we should have visions, views, standpoints and stories, and the more we know, the less we know for sure. And that is the humble way of understanding sciences and all things that are coming from any angle. And understanding that we are choosing things in the ways that really is within when using the infinity in life, and when making the choices to explain the things we are trying to explain. And we should use the things with and without protection, and we need to think ourselves, and doing the behavior just as we can imagine, and we should think about which imginations that is possible for people from all the relevant reality that people have lived within, and which reality they have tried to live and to operate within.
So, what should we believe in the communciation? There are many things, and many variables and factors, and each of these elements can be changed from time to time. But the people being in the media channels, should choose their words and their perspectives and ways to understand the life. And maybe, MIT is not able to understand the talking and the writing good enough, and we should try to find the philosophy and the ways we are acting, when we are formulating when we are formulating. And we can find many words in the documents, and sometimes there is a story there, and we can find philosophy and not any reasons for why we are doing as we are doing. And Harvard is open giving our best to form our environments, and there are many variables and factors about understanding what we are doing, and that was always the mission and the message to professor Ragnar Frisch in Norway, and the received the Nobel Prize in Economics together with professor Jan Tinbergen from the Netherlands. So, what about using the books to emeritus professor Hal Varian? They are easy, and it is much about getting the utility, the profit and the wealth of nations.
Please do follow if you want to keep up with my next article. Any upvotes or resteems are hugely appreciated!
Latest article, check out :
On sowing and growing and harvesting the grain; How to develop products from the soil!
Sverre Larsen
Kristiansand, Norway
Latest content: Travel, Art, Food, Article, Poetry
