RE: A few questions
only curators can force authors to check their texts and improve the quality of publications
Curators and audiences who simply ignore the crap on offer...
Come on, let's keep fighting for it! You (sc team) and I (own stake) are sitting at the source and can keep moving the rudder a tiny little bit in the right direction. That alone will not change the course. But if many join our example, there is still a small chance...
an example [is the] small Ukrainian community
Yes, right. Exactly how it works there was the intention from the beginning. It was: "We will strengthen your community accounts so that you will eventually be able to "look after" yourselves. But instead of pushing this further, the focus was on opening up the communities through SEC. The communities were flooded by "outsiders" who didn't even keep half an eye on the actual community posts. This is the opposite of strengthening a community. This is breeding greedy egocentrics who don't care about community members. And so many play along with this destructive game...
a relatively powerful curator account
This is one reason. The other reason is that you have enough members who are satisfied with this kind of attention.
It is similar "with us" in DU. The community is so small that it has never been enough for great growth of the community account. But that doesn't matter. We are so small that I can oversee this role privately. And I can count on my members: Everyone supports everyone else (as long as they like the article). For most, that's enough; only a few hop from community to community for publications. I'm only talking about publications now, because extending your feed to other users and communities for reading should be a matter of course if you're genuinely interested.
Yes, I try to act like that. It is also important that we resteem good posts. For example, I like the authors @weisser-rabe finds.
The intention is clear and correct. Maybe in some cases it will still work, but there will always be parasites around the resources of the Steemit team.
This is a must! The naughtiness of the SEC (resteem as a condition of participation) is terrible! It distorts everything. Do you know @realrobinhood? Here @steemchiller (yes, that's his account - you're welcome to vote for him to thank the Chiller for the use of his SteemWorld...) has programmed a calculation for "really popular" articles. In addition to votes, comments and resteems are also included. Well, on the assumption that only good articles are resteemed... In the meantime, it is also the SEC calls. But I am proud that my fairy tale was number 1 in today's edition of his charts (without a call...).
Wherever there is something to get, there will be parasites. Experience lets us recognise them quickly. Experience. Not habit...
Yes, I read steemchiller's post in which he wrote that he does Power Down to create a new project. Then came @realrobinhood. Sometimes my posts make it to this list, but I've never been on top :)
I often forget to resteem posts that are interesting to me. I am trying to fight this :)
It will be an uphill fight if we don't manage to fight the "resteem obligation" of the SEC calls.... ;-)
TEAM 1
Congratulations! This comment has been upvoted through steemcurator04. We support quality posts , good comments anywhere and any tags.