RE: Steemit Crypto Academy Contest / S14W5 : Exploring STEEM/USDT Trading
Hi friend @artist1111, I have found many similarities in your work and the work @sahmie does and the structure is also similar.
I see that you mention the red arrows that @sahmie has in his graph, but I don't see them in yours.
Written by you:
The screenshot showcases the MACD indicator integrated into the chart, allowing me to spot crossovers between the MACD line and the signal line. It helps identify potential buy or sell signals for Steem.
In the subsequent image, red arrows pinpoint moments where the MACD line crosses below the Signal line, indicating potential sell opportunities. Conversely, green arrows highlight instances where the MACD line crosses above the Signal line, signaling potential buying chances.
The writing by @sahmie:
From the screenshot above, we have the Red arrows pointed at the points where the MACD line is crossing below the Signal line, indicating our potential sell points, while the Green arrows at the points where the MACD line is crossing above the Signal line indicting our potential buy points. We also have the histogram showing the peeks and throughs of the upward and downward trends respective.
Therefore it is an invalid entry and I encourage you to be original.
Invalid entry.
C.C. @steemcurator01 , @kouba01
I want to start by expressing my respect to both parties involved in the discussion. Then, they recognize that the intensity of the discussion, notably initiated by @artist1111, could have been more moderate, since in our academy, we evaluate the work of students rather than accusing them, and where the aim is not of thwarting your efforts.
Moving to the heart of the matter, i agree with my colleague's point of view, to the extent that the reference the article by sahmie was mentioned, suggesting some form of partial copying. However, i did not consider this to be a major issue and sees it as a learning opportunity for future competitions. i convey that the colleague's respect for @artist1111 remains intact, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect within the academy. Thank you!
Thank you, Professor, for providing a neutral perspective. I want to clarify that my intention isn't to engage in a heated debate. However, I feel compelled to address @pelon53's observation about my post. It raises doubts about my integrity on this platform. Additionally, mentioning SC01 seems inappropriate unless they have discussed this matter to confirm with you there on a social platform .
Now let me share my perspective on it regarding this vary matter ;
Yes, Professor, I agree. I admit that I referenced Sahmie's article, acknowledging the inspiration. Now, the question remains: how much, where, and in what way?
Respectfed professor , I have credited Sahmie's work because I did draw structural inspiration from it. I commend Sahmie for their excellent work, & for educational purposes, I derived ideas up to a certain extent. However, I implemented these ideas in my own manner, utilizing my own screenshots and my own approach. It's important to note that the aspect being highlighted seems to make up a small portion, about 1/8, of my post. Consequently, it feels very unfair that my entire content is receiving negative criticism based on this fractional aspect.
Next, this is very baseless that respected @pelon53 this accusing my content with only time and again "similar to ...." not adding ground proof to prove it or atleast clear it to me so that i can respond him appropriately .
Indeed its not a big issue, yet it raises a question mark regarding my integrity on this platform.
Respected professors, I really apologize if my language seemed intense. I truly respect both of you and value your perspectives. However, the matter concerning my integrity requires a response and necessary clarification. Thank you immensely, @kouba01 professor, for your support ❤️❤️❤️.
Well spoken sir, it's important to start by showing respect to both parties involved in the discussion. It's great that you recognize the intensity of the conversation and how it could have been more moderate. Diving into the main point, you don't see it as a major issue but rather as a chance to learn for future competitions. It's also good that you still maintain respect for @artist1111 and emphasize the importance of mutual respect within the academy. Thanks for sharing your perspective as even I was short of words and not knowing what to say not to offend any of the parties involved. Thank you once again.
Love you brother 💖💖💖💖🙏
Very loose observation by you, professor. I really apologize, but it seems you did not review the entire post thoroughly. I am unsure under what circumstances you are giving this credit solely based on following @ sahmie's structure. While I do follow @ sahmie, my content stems from my own ideas & practical implementation. I firmly believe that practical work is not a product of plagiarism but rather a demonstration of creativity, and that's precisely what I've aimed for in my content.
Regarding your assertion about the absence of the red arrows present in @ sahmie's graph within my work, I must admit that I omitted to include another screenshot. I inadvertently forgot to add it, but I have rectified this error now. I would appreciate it if you could verify and note that I have included the necessary elements.
Your claim of similarities in content prompts my response: while there might indeed be similarities in ideas, I take great care to provide proper attribution and post link of @ sahmie as the source. Despite these similarities, I ensure that credit is duly given where it's due. I acknowledge the ideas' origin & reference @ sahmie, so I am puzzled by your suggestion that my work lacks originality.
Let me know if there's any other aspect you'd like me to address or clarify regarding my content and its relation to @ sahmie's work.
C.c @kouba01
Could you please favor me by providing just one concrete reason why you believe my content is plagiarized? Is it due to following a similar structure or adhering to comparable ideas? I regretfully forgot to upload one screenshot that I had designed earlier, although it's still in my gallery, and I've now rectified that by uploading it.
Additionally for your rest do you think its not enough that I've properly credited @sahmie as the source. What further aspects remain in question and for your objection so for?
Dear friend i give proper reference to the post