Imagine America if Trump declared himself King forever! Now think about Britain...
People in the 'ahem' united kingdom (Britain) often laugh at Donald Trump and make jokes about the people who 'must' have elected him. Setting aside the reality that the democracies are entirely fake - have you all looked at your own situation lately?
What exactly is the difference between such a disturbing image as someone like Donald Trump letting his megalomania and massive ego tripping, self denial take him way off the edge of the cliff and declaring himself 'King forever' and what has ACTUALLY happened in Britain and other monarch based systems? Not much!
We are sold the lie that the monarchs are 'just figureheads' and are 'good for tourism', but this absolutely is not the truth. Firstly, they actually have final veto on all acts of parliament, meaning that no laws can be made if the monarch objects to them. Secondly, the rate of return for tourism cannot be accurately assessed without taking into consideration the negative affect that they have on the psychology of millions of people due to them being brainwashed into thinking that they are subordinates in a hierarchy that they cannot change.
Why would anyone think that being born into a pecking order that has nothing to do with merit or skill is a good thing? They generally wouldn't unless they were near the top somehow or they simply didn't think enough - at all.
I could talk about the way that the alleged Royal family is not even the 'real' one because of some switcheroos that took place about 200 years ago - but it would be pointless because THERE IS NOT A VALID, REAL MONARCHY, PERIOD!
Hierarchy of this kind is basically evil and has held humanity back long enough. The level of suffering that it causes is immense and cannot be sustained now. Do you think that these people actually care about 'the people'? They don't even care at all. Do they visit the same hospitals as 'their' people? No. At every opportunity, they are held in a vacuum away from 'their' people.
Notice anything unusual about the nurse's belt badge?
But things will change.. It's 2018...
Erm, well, yes things change constantly - but that doesn't mean they are going in the way we need.
What do you think this hand gesture means? Is it just a matter of photographic timing?
This is the well known 'hidden hand' gesture that can be seen in numerous portraits of people in such positions throughout hundreds of years of history. As far as I am aware, it literally means 'hidden hand' - in the sense that it is a power symbol to those 'in the know' - informing them that this person is operating in secret to alter the destiny of the world. This is not a 'hey guys, let's work together to improve the planet' - this is a 'fuck you all, I'm the boss and have armies to stop you from stopping me'.
The average human has a huge weight of trauma and denied emotions held in their unconsciousness. The held charges of rage and terror are the causes of 'unexplained' murders and violence. Imagine how much the alleged royals carry, given their background in military and similar environments. This does not bode well for us. Change is needed.
Who is the joke really on?
The reality here is that when we mock the absurdity and unconsciousness of 'other people's "leaders", as long as we ourselves are also stuck with alleged "leaders", we are also mocking ourselves. We don't get anywhere by just mocking things, we actually have to DO things to improve our reality. Do you want to just sit and laugh at billionaire zombies? Or do you want (NEED) to actually take steps to improve life?
We must wrestle our destiny back from the hands of the least qualified to hold it.
Wishing you well,
Ura Soul
Vote @ura-soul for Steem Witness!
(Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Steem Blockchain.
Without witnesses there is no Steem, Steemit, DTube, Utopian or
Busy... You can really help Steem by making your 30 witness votes count!)
My recent favourite quote is "If voting made any difference, it would be illegal."
By nature, we are hierarchical animals. In small groups this was never a real issue, but as we've evolved and our groups have amalgamated into big country sized groups and this tendency to want to be near the top of the hierarchy has gotten all out of proportion and created tyranny.
In theory we should be able to change this and evolve in an enlightened way, because the masses outnumber the controllers enormously. Unfortunately, most of the masses can't seem to escape their evolutionary programming to see this, so those that could make a difference are outnumbered by the ones who fear breaking the mould.
I like to say "If politics was intended to solve problems, the problems would already be solved".
We all have our own nature and my nature is to change and evolve - so I am neither hierarchical or non hierarchical by nature - I am simply change itself. At this point I have changed to understand that hierarchy is counterproductive for the individual and since we are all individuals before we are part of a group, hierarchy is also counter productive for groups.
We can change the conditioning and programming, absolutely - it has already been done by many of us - but not by the majority. We need to be ok with disconnecting from the activities of the majority now.
How very true!
I think we are okay doing this, unfortunately the majority isn't okay with people disconnecting.
Oh for heaven's sake dude, now I'm going to waste the rest of my weekend looking up hand gestures. I just did a quick google, and it's going to be a long night down this rabbit hole 😭😭
hehe - well, it's better to know than not know.. just don't forget that nearly everyone has hands and sometimes a bogie pick is just a bogie pick.
Man you know I thought you were one of them, one of the drink the cool aid, suck it up buttercup crew, then I read this, and I am like wow, this guy is deep, and really one of us.
No sarcasm intended, I am just like wow, that was a superb article.
Thanks! I'm not sure why thought that but if I were to show you the list of the things people have claimed that I am in the past you would see the mis-characterisation is not a problem.. lol
:-) No offense intended bro. You keep doing what you do, likes ya style is all.
This made me laugh shepz!
I'm starting to realise no-one approaches this in quite the same way and coming from different viewpoints and directions is a real eye opener. There are guaranteed to be things that people disagree on, even if the direction they're heading in is the same.
Posted using Partiko Android
Agreeing about everything, got us where we are now, debate, different points of view are essential, I would hope, so everyone can get along, without, them - they - the few. that ruin this world, thanks for liking my comment. :-)
Awesome post, totally agree. Just for the record most people I know in the Midlands, England actually cheered and where hopeful of change when trump got elected. The people protesting him here in the UK are from the msm or people that reside in London, who as can be seen from the Brexit regional voting results have a totally different view of things.
Personally, I would be protesting Trump if I thought it made any difference, but since the system is entirely fake - there is no point!
I stopped voting a while back, like you say being partisan and focussing on blue or red / irrelevant things is pointless.
I agree that Britain, as well as all other monarchies, should be a republic. And psychologically, it may help a bit to have the technically highest office in the land elected, no doubt about it.
Where I think you're wrong though, is that the Queen still has real power because she "can veto bills". Sure, the protocol says a bill is only law when the Queen signed it. But when was the last time she or any other monarch actually used that power?
Something similar happened in Denmark in 1920, where the king dismissed the government because he didn't like their foreign policy. Even though the Danish Constitution of 1866, at that point it was 54 years old, explicitely gave him that power, because of tradition, that became very clear around 1900, the parliament was to be in full control of the country.
After that, there was a Constitutional crisis, which resulted in the king backing down in fear of the entire monarchy being overthrown, and from that point on the king of Denmark never took political action without the full support of parliament again
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Crisis_of_1920
So if the Queen only does what parliament says, like sign the bills parliament wants etc, then that means she doesn't have real power. If she went against them, parliament would likely overthrow her within a week, like in Denmark.
Easter Crisis of 1920
The Easter Crisis of 1920 was a constitutional crisis and a significant event in the development of constitutional monarchy in Denmark during the Easter in March–April that year. It began with the dismissal of the elected government by the reigning monarch, King Christian X, a reserve power which was granted to him by the Danish constitution.
There are a variety of examples of leaked documents from the alleged royals in recent years showing examples of where they have adamantly stepped in behind the scenes to prevent things happening in parliament. The people are not informed of this usually.
Examples? And how do you know if "the people aren't informed usually"?
I'd say any influence they have is similar to the influence that celebrities have, which is just PR. But royals don't even campaign politically, so what else, aside from talking privately, can they do?
The constitutional documents make abundantly clear (as I recall) that the monarch has the ability to be more than a figurehead. One example, from memory, of the alleged royals being very involved with affecting policy is here.
My Great Uncle was a Lord while he was alive and a personal friend of 'the queen' - while I don't pretend to know all the details of that, I do know that what gets viewed on paper publicly and what actually occurs behind the scenes are wildly different.
The parliament is the Monarch's parliament - this is not hidden. They don't need to campaign because they literally control it all! Social hierarchy and the associated greed and stupidity that go along with it mean that most people would rather try to benefit from it all than question it - once they get closer.
Ok, it is a fair point that royals shouldn't have top-secret informstion just because they're royals. That would be yet another good reason to finally make Britain a Constitutional republic. As I said, I entirely agree with that goal, but they don't secretely control pokicy or something. If they did, why then do the Tories still do Tory policies while Labour does Labour policies? Wouldn't the UK have had the same policies for the last 70 years or so, over the Queen's life?
The general direction of politics hardly ever changes - this is well known. Regardless of which team gets to be the puppets for the present duration, the outcomes rarely really change much - only the slogans and surface direction of some policies. Plans and policies change regardless of who is running things. I am not saying that this family/group has ultimate control over everything - but they have massively more than most people have been led to believe.
Even if you don't think the alleged royals have much involvement, there is still the house of lords who prevent legislation passing and they are basically the close friends of the monarch.
You make a good point, by saying that the politics of both Tories and Labour PMs have barely differed from each other over the last few decades. I'd say the reason for that is that corporations have immense influence in the world, even without directly bribing politicians. When a corporation tells a Tory or Labour MP "I'll move such and such many jobs to yoir constituency if you vote for that bill I want", then that will be a factor the MP will have to deal with. And on the national level, corporations can do tons of stuff to extort the government, as well of course
How do I know that? It's not much different in countries that don't have a monarch. In Germany, the two major "opposing people's parties" actually regularly form coalitions together, that's how close they are politicy-wise. In the US Democrats and Republicans repeatedly come together for "bipartisan" legislation to boost military spending, start wars, give corporations tax breaks, give wall street bailouts and then allow them to gamble even more.
That's all things that corporations and other powerful economic players want. And in the current version of capitalism in those countries, they have enormeous influence over politicians, and thus over policy
These systems have been designed virtually since the beginning to be entirely fake - it's amazing how many observers haven't realised yet. I strongly suggest checking out the post i linked to in the first paragraph of the OP.
@politikhos
The blue and red teams are just a distraction to keep everyone in place, they don't actually have different policies, they both push through laws in the same overall direction, albeit with perhaps a few slight differences. It's a facade.
The real power lies elsewhere...
I disagree as to what these common goals Democrats and Republicans have in common, but agree that they're basically controlled by the same people. And that is powerful billionaires and corporations
They give politicians money for their campaigns, which means if a politician goes against them, he loses the necessary money to get reelected. Once the politician is out of office, he is "employed" by those corporation, for which he gets millions of dollars a year. Both of that is quite literally just bribes. And whethter a particular politician is in it for the money or only for the power: Either way he can basically only stay or get in power with the help of those powerful individuals and corporations.
The only way for a politician to circumvent this, and stay independent, is to not take money from corporations or billionaires, and instead only take donations from the people.
What I want to do is to get an Amendent to the Constitution, banning politicians from taking money from corporations or get more than 200$ from anyone, for example billionaires (ban PACs and Super-PACs and lower donation threshold). Additionally, we could introduce a program matching individual donations, so that for every dollar a candidate receives, he gets another one from the state
What do you think about that?
I think that's a good start regarding donations, however we already have something like that( public declaration of political party monies received) in England and it hasn't solved the fact that the entire world is being pushed in the general direction of what I said below.
I think we need to start asking questions of our politicians of long term strategies, not bickering over shit that doesn't really matter.
Rothschilds and other wealthy families probably think about stuff on long time frames, perhaps 100 years into the future, so why don't our politicians?
For example the current direction both teams are pushing on us is....
More government
More taxes
More imigration
Gay empowerment
Trans enpowerment
Female empowerment
Destruction of tribal people worldwide
Forgot a couple. ..
More debt
More gambling
More alcohol
More surveillance
Freemasons
Posted using Partiko Android
Shh... They'll hear you ;)
Here in NZ we worship royalty AND have a zionist puppet "prime minister" who may even be a tranny like the freak they have in Canada - so we are fully sorted!
I think Theresa may the UK pm is also a tranny, her? Awkard man dancing, big hands, big feet are a giveaway for me. It seems to be all the rage these days! I don't have anything against tranny's I think everyone should be able to do what they want with there own body.
However I feel that undisclosed tranny's should not be allowed into seats of power, due to the fact that they can be blackmailed easily.
Once I started looking at American celebs - the tranny thing just grew and grew
Pure Evil
Personally, I think that this is more about the feminine being desecrated and denied so heavily that many women are more masculine than feminine.
You are totally mad aren't you? - But I better not go there, it could all go badly...
I't s not so hard to understand if you ask questions ;)
I suspect we would rapidly reach a point of stalemate on that issue!
we can't go on together... with suspicious mindssssss... :)
The New Zealandian PM had a baby while in office, and she's actually a pretty woman, your "proof" of her being trans is a painting...
She wore a baby bump and had an adopted baby (just like so many celebs do). But she was way too skinny to actually conceive and had a long history of infertility that miraculously disappeared the day she was elected.
Since she was put into power this latest zionist puppet has really helped fuck the NZ economy by doing every bullshit move possible.
I usually try to be a bit more zen, but yeah I loath the evil lying bitch!
Here she is with her boss - or one of them - helen clark
So you're against zionism for some reason, meaning you don't want Israel to be a state. What else do you want then, kill them all or a state together with Palestine? Or forcibly remove the Jews there back to European and American ghettos?
So your plan is what now? That you hate the Jews but you're afraid if you call for forcibly removing them or annihaliting them that would go too far, so you just want to keep them as a boogy man?
Note - I said zionists - you said Jews - but I'll stop here.
"To stifle legitimate criticism of Jews and Zionist Israel"
I take it that includes Jews?
Well, the sheep population is known to be very high! :/
THANK YOU!!! I hate the royals they suck!!!! Tjry do nothing and are praised when they choose do what they should like pay taxes. Why do we glorify royalty. Royalty sucks. The person in power should change with the times and represent the people and just be that, a representative. Not a gos or some holy figure or ruling class that decides the fate of all for the betterment of some.🤨😐😑
Curated for #informationwar (by @gregorypatrick)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 9,500 Steem Power and 40+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
I have shared this post to our Gab, Twitter, Tumblr and Freedomsocial feeds as well as our reddit!! Join us everywhere Decentralized News lives and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call
Check out our live interactive podcasts every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 12am UTC.
Ways you can help the @informationwar