Feedback Wanted: 4 Week Power Down - RESPONSEsteemCreated with Sketch.

in #ethicslast month (edited)

I believe this is a bad idea (4 week power-down).

The whole point of powering-up-your-steem is to take it out of circulation and stabilize the economy.

The longer you keep it powered-up, the more effectively it serves its purpose (13 weeks seems reasonable).

It also serves as a type of LOYALTY OATH.

A better "update" would be to give people the option to PERMANENTLY power-up-their-steem!!!

That way we could all stop hearing about the BURNPOSTS.

I voted AGAINST the 4 week power-down proposal - here -

My vote is recorded here,


Click to watch 2 minutes,


Copyright notice: Feel free to copy and paste any LOGICZOMBIE original content (posts and or comments and or replies and logiczombie logo, excluding quoted 3rd party content of course) according to copyleft principles. copyleft wiki

Use the tag #LOGICZOMBIE if you'd like to participate in a civil debate or have your post critiqued for logical coherence.

Essential sites for (new) steemit users:
check anybody's steemit activity log
check anybody's steemit activity patterns (delegations)
offical steemit etiquette guide
check anybody's re-steems
check anybody's achievments
check anybody's ranking
identify the most influential steemit users
advice for minnows and plankton
steemit explained (TBHTS)
are you tired of $0.00 rewards? (balance denominated in SBD)
are you tired of $0.00 rewards? also check
important facts about rep
Also, set your rewards to 100% steem power and you'll get a cool steem logo next to all your posts!!
Also, if you're getting harassed by downvoters, set your rewards to "declined" so they don't hurt your rep (but you still get rep from upvotes!!) and then when you're safely above a rep of 26+, all the newb robot downvotes won't affect you.

Perhaps anarchy already exists and government is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime. – @thoughts-in-time



Your scathing critique is requested.


I think this is such a foundational thing to how Steem works that fucking with it is just another push by shitposters who want to get their cash out quicker. They already have been given the convenience of choosing 50/50 , if they want then it would be best to just be in perpetual powerdown and shut up about it.

I think a permanent-power-up option would be a great alternative to "burnposting".

It's these fcking busybodies bro, busybodies...

Thank you for bringing this to my attention! As I'm fairly new to proposals and still to steem in general I'm utterly confused. Dozens of questions I can not grasp. So start with one: How can a 3 month old post (the FOR proposal) reference a 3 days old post (the AGAINST proposal)? Sorry if this question is not easy to follow, but I wanted to jot it down for it not to be lost.

When a proposal is 3 months old (aprox. 12 weeks), looks like it's a good ideo to power-down like this and not faster. LOL The first time I voted on a proposal. kadsching !invest_vote

How can a 3 month old post (the FOR proposal) reference a 3 days old post (the AGAINST proposal)?

Excellent observation, I don't have an answer for this one.

Congratulations @logiczombie! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got more than 3750 replies. Your next target is to reach 4000 replies.

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!

@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?