The flu renamed every two years is still the flu

in #coronavirus4 months ago (edited)

Virus theory is all complete bullshit anyway.

Viral disease is poisoning. Corona started with industrial pollution and 5g rollout in Wuhan. Spanish flu was vaccination and aspirin poisoning

Polio was DDT poisoning Flu is air pollution (inc emf) and winter vit d deficiency Meningitis is drug poisoning

Smallpox was a mild easily curable non contagious sanitary disease They changed meaning of virus from poison to germ to create fear and hence vaccination They then vanished toxicology They then vanished the vitamin c cure for all viral disease since 1930s which would have destroyed vaccination

No virus has ever been isolated. “Viruses have never been isolated, none, there is no measles virus” — Dr Robert Young


There is no such thing as a virus.

Paul Erlich and Robert Koch and some others made up the theory in the late 1800s.



All the modern chemical giants were just getting started mid century, around the time that germ theory was taking off.

When people were getting sick and dying from exposure to the new chemical poisons, they needed a way to divert attention. They tried to claim these illnesses were infections, but could find no infectious agent under the microscopes. So they made up viruses.

They were hypothesized to be little tiny bugs too small to see. What is telling is, the word virus means liquid poison.

It was not until the late 1930s that they invented the electron microscope and could see really small things, things the size of small snips of dna floating around in the lab juice. When they found these things they just pointed at them and said, "Ah hah! We've found what we were looking for." Which is ridiculous because they did not know anything at all about what they had just found, what it was, where it came from, what it did.

In order to prepare a specimen for the electron microscope, you have to kill it. So when they are looking at "viruses" they are looking at cellular debris from cells that have been poisoned.

How do they find a virus? They take tissue, blood, or whatever, culture it in a lab, then poison it so the cells die and become just a pile of goo. They then make the electron microscope slide and look at the gunk on the slide. In all that gunk are little snips of dna. And there you have your virus.

A virus is a piece of poisoned, lab grown dna.

When they say, "viral illness" what they mean is poisoning. If you have a viral illness, you have been poisoned and your body is cleaning itself out.

What else besides things we ingest or inject can destroy our cells and make us ill, causing little snips of dna to show up in lab cell cultures? Electromagnetic radiation.

What is more, they are identifying this virus via pcr testing (polymerase chain reaction testing). They are identifying tiny little fragments of the dna code of these snips. They are not sequencing the entire thing in each patient.

So all these people are coming down with illnesses that cause the destruction of their cells and it is being called a viral illness because they find bits of dna in the resultant dead tissues.

They are finding the results of what they do and thinking it is the cause of the illness. They are making people sick, then blaming something they find as a result of their actions.

Elliott Freed



Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally mostly known as an “AIDS dissident” (and maybe “gentechnology dissident”) who has been questioning the very existence of “HIV” since 1994. In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proof of their existence. Actually, Dr. Lanka already stated three years ago, in the almost “legendary” Zenger´s interview:

“So, for a long time I studied virology, from the end to the beginning, from the beginning to the end, to be absolutely sure that there was no such thing as HIV. And it was easy for me to be sure about this because I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses – as well as other viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous – in fact do not exist at all.”

So he thoroughly read the literature on those “other viruses” again, and after he could still not find any paper which would provide the evidence, he encouraged people not to BELIEVE him but to ask the institutes and authorities themselves. This has actually eventuated, mostly initiated by mothers. The responses were revealing. In September 2001 the German book “Impfen – Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend?” (Vaccination – Genocide in the third millennium?) by Stefan Lanka and Karl Krafeld was published in which they state that there is still no proof of any (medically relevant) virus.

This movement (klein-klein-aktion ~ many little actions/steps) has a German website: which I have taken (and translated) all the following texts from.

For almost one year we have been asking authorities, politicians and medical institutes for the scientific evidence for the existence of such viruses that are said to cause disease and therefore require “immunization”. After almost one year we have not received even one concrete answer which provides evidence for the existence of those “vaccine-preventable viruses”. The conclusion is inevitable that our children are still vaccinated on the basis of scientific standards of the 18th and 19th century. In the 19th century Robert Koch demanded in his generally accepted postulates evidence of the virus in order to prove infection; at Koch´s time this evidence couldn´t be achieved directly by visualization and characterization of the viruses, because adequate technology wasn´t available at that time. Methods of modern medicine have profoundly changed over the past 60 years, in particular by the invention of the electron microscope, yet all these viruses we get immunised against have still never been re-examined using this technology?

We showed to Dr. Lanka a number of images and explanations we were pointed to and that were said to show – respectively describe (characterise) viruses. Here are his summarising comments:

“All these photos have in common that they, respectively the authors, can´t claim that they represent a virus, as long as they do not also provide the original publications which describe how and what from the virus has been isolated. Such original publications are cited nowhere.

Indeed, in the entire scientific medical literature there´s not even one publication, where the fulfillment of Koch´s first postulate is even claimed for such viruses. This means that there is no proof that the viruses held responsible for these diseases have been isolated from humans afflicted by them. Nevertheless, this is precisely what they publicly claim.


Now, regarding the photos submitted:

  1. Many of the photos are colored. This is proof enough, that they are the (art)work of designers, because electron microscopic photos always appear in black and white.

  2. The images of the so called HIV-, measles (Masern)- and smallpox (Pocken) viruses clearly show, as the image descriptions partly already indicate, that these are cells wherein the viruses can allegedly be found. Thus, nothing has been isolated. The photos actually show cells and typical endogenous particles in them. These structures are well known and serve the intra- and inter-cellular transport. Unlike viruses of the same kind – which are consistently the same size and same shape – they differ in size and shape and therefore can´t have been isolated.

  3. In the case of the influenza- herpes-, vaccinia-, polio-, adeno- and ebola-viruses each photo shows only a single particle; nobody claims that they´re isolated particles, let alone particles that have been isolated from humans.

These particles are partially the cellular particles mentioned above (#2) resp. typical artifacts which means: structures that accrue after inappropriate fixing and drying of the probes, while being prepared for the electron microscope.

  1. The “isolated” polio viruses are artificial particles, generated by suction of an indifferent mass through a very fine filter into a vacuum. Its structure (no characteristic structures) differ clearly from the ones of the “viruses” in the cells. Here the information is essential that a biochemical characterization of those “isolated” viruses, although “isolation” is claimed, has never been published anywhere nor has anybody even claimed such a characterization.

  2. The photo of the hepatitis B “viruses” does not show isolated structures, but – as the image title already says, an agglutinate. This is the scientific/medical term for proteins from the blood that are clumped together, as is typical for coagulations. Typically, round and also crystal structures accrue – depending on the condition of the blood sample – as a consequence .

In summary, it must be said that these photos are an attempt of fraud committed by the researchers and medical scientists involved, as far as they assert that these structures are viruses or even isolated viruses. To what extent the involved journalists and authors of textbooks have contributed to this fraud knowingly or only out of gross negligence, I don´t know. Everyone who starts researching the medical literature, will quickly encounter statements and references that Koch´s first postulate can´t be fulfilled (i.e. Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben, 1997 [“A short history of the microbes”]; editor: Verlag für angewandte Wissenschaft). How these authors who claim the existence of viruses could overlook that, remains a riddle.

Could it be that the term “Contagium” = “Gift” (poison/toxin) = “Virus” from the 18th and 19th century was applied in the 20th century to the cell components which were named “viruses” since the electron microscope was introduced in 1931? And in order to hide this, the “disease causing viruses” have often been described, yet have never been isolated? And then they were used as seemingly logical explanation for poisonings and adverse affects of vaccination, as Luhmann (1995) (i.e.) writes about the symptomatic of Hepatitis B, which was observed for the first time in 1985 following smallpox vaccinations, and 1938 following measles vaccinations? The copies in the textbooks show only homogenous structures within cells and nothing that looks like something which has been isolated. The biochemical characterization, which is crucial, is completely lacking.

Robert Koch and colleagues, Prof. Rush, Prof. Max von Pettenkofer, Prof. Virchow have shown, for instance by experiments and by observation of the Henle-Koch´s rules that by transmission of bacteria, the supposed ‘contagium vivum’, it was not possible to cause the same disease. So Robert Koch modified (weakened) the 3rd postulate of his teacher, the German anatomist Henle, in that the generation of a similar symptom in animal experiments was now considered sufficient to prove the hypothesis of disease causation by infectious bacteria. (See Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben).

So it does not surprise me that Prof. Alfred Fischer writes in his book “Vorlesungen über Bakterien” (“[academic] lectures on bacteria”) from 1897 (!): “As is true for any infectious disease – the fact that it does not only take the addition of the bacteria (for disease to occur) but also the unknown something of individual predisposition, goes without saying.”

Stefan Lanka -



Yep, any day now.

Except for me... i'm going to live forever...
but, if i did that, they would lock me up for something, and then i would spend forever in jail....

Ok, We're all going to dieeeeeee!!1!!one!!


No, I kid.

It really is cringy to watch the scientic experts backpedal away from presenting substantial truth (is the evidence really so heavily guarded by copyrights and respect for higher elites?), by merely showing charts and trends that support the hundred year old theories of what these diseases are.

I am still not certain many/all of these diseases are not the same thing. The body causes all kinds of awful symptoms in an attempt to cleanse itself.

We live in an age where the same science also believes all mental illnesses are best treated with harmful drugs.

Great post. I found it fascinating to learn more about the history of outdated modern medical scientific theory.

Needles scare me, because I know whatever synthetic chemical is inside will be unrecognizable to my vital organs and certain key unreplaceble vulnerable cells.

Excellent post!! You might like this podcast I talk about all this in.

Thanks - I'll check it out - I was wondering if there is any point posting any of this stuff online when so few people are open to researching it, but seeing you put it all over Facebook was an inspiration - somebody, somewhere, just might look into it further!


It was Royal Rife that formed the base for Koch , and now we know why Rife was destroyed by calling him a fraud . He was a danger to big pharma .

I am not concerned about covid19 only the crap the govs are putting in place.

Posted using Partiko Android

I think the take away from all this is to see the social engineering in real time and to minimize our exposure to the insanity. I love the fact that folks are doing research and questioning the corporate-owned media's narrative.

Once the dust settles, it will be interesting to see the damage control as everyone talks about how their communities weren't effected and no one in good health died.

I hope that happens but the more I read about the 1976 swine flu scam the more I go and look at memes...


I think I am more concerned about socialism and the fact that many are happy to give away their powers for a little bit of comfort or at least perceived comfort. Are you writing an essay on the 1976 swine flu scam? I hope so, I would love to learn more. I think I am going to do some research on Stalin. Everyone always focuses on Hitler but I think Stalin was far more sinister.

And yes, the corporate-owned media gets its marching orders from the oligarchy. Human behavior has been studied for a long time for a reason.

I've put 76 swine flu on my list of posts to do, but our sales have gone nuts this week so no posts for me at the moment


It's when you aren't allowed to question the narrative that should be the biggest sign that something is amiss.

The only way to stay safe and avoid the flue, is to buy it and have it installed. The most effective vaccine on the market!


People are getting sick and dying of something ...Who cares what you call it..
I'm with you on the vaccination BS ... Having a strong immune system is you best defense....

Like your art work.. Would like to see more ...with explanations of what I'm looking at .... 👀👍

I don't know what I'm looking at myself half the time :)



Your chart shows the fear absurdity of this virus/flu ...


I appreciate your skepticism, but cannot support what I believe is factually incorrect regarding the existence of viruses and the diseases they cause. Smallpox, measles and mumps weren't inconsequential in history, but killed millions, tens, maybe hundreds of millions of people, in the Americas alone.

I reckon your lack of education in the biological sciences may explain your failure to understand viruses, and how they impact us. Please do undertake the necessary research to learn relevant facts regarding the reality of viruses, and the very real danger the diseases they cause is.

Sorry, but I do not agree with this post, and cannot support it. I hope your nescience regarding biology does not compromise your safety - or anyone elses should you fail to take necessary steps to prevent becoming infected or infecting others.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on that. I'd say biological sciences are no more factual than any other branches of the sickness industry - indoctrination is not education, and profits are not science based.


I also post quite similar charts to the above, as I also point out by the time vaccines were introduced for most diseases they were almost completely controlled. The Scarlet Fever chart is perhaps most revealing, as there is still no vaccine for it, yet it's control was concurrent with those diseases that do have vaccines.

It shows that the control was not established by vaccine, but improved medical care, hygiene, and epidemiology, for all the diseases shown.

None of that remotely matters regarding the existence of virii.

Edit: my work for a state agency as a biologist had nothing to do with the sickness industry, any more than carpentry does. I realize you may not grasp the difference in subjects, but just because the fields involve living things does not equate them.

The medical field depends on biology, not the other way around. Big Pharma didn't fund my population dynamics research on Sebastes sp. They could care less about rockfish. I don't tout AGW alarmism either.

I wouldn't ever get too far into an online word exchange with you - you could tie me in knots and rip my head off!

To be honest, I think vaccines, virus theory, and big pharma are all just different branches of the NWO/illuminati/rotchild/eugenics/one world government agenda and this another variation of the usual pattern.

But I have put a decent pile of evidence in this post, and so far you haven't posted any yourself.

This reminds me a bit of the time I did a post saying nuclear bombs are a complete fiction - people got all spazzed out, but I still stand by that 100% and nobody has ever proven anything I said was wrong.

Here is a short version of that post:

(I'm changing the subject here in an attempt to show how society has been programmed to believe utter crap from the top levels down)


My friend, the evidence that virii exist is extremely extensive, but requires prior knowledge to grasp it's relevance. Interestingly, a similar dynamic is involved in nuclear physics. You might give that thought.

If you want to know what evidence there is for either, start at the beginning and work your way up. That's what I did. I don't have a degree, or more than an occasional college class here and there.

You're intelligent enough to understand the content of biology texts, and the DNA and RNA mechanisms that are relevant to living things and virii make sense in context.

I can't post biology texts here, but you can read them if you want to understand the supporting evidence for the existence of viruses. I have done a lot of reading, and backed that up by conducting experiments that showed that reading wasn't just a bunch of lies.

Doing that yourself is convincing. Listening to me, or reading what I write, is far less so.

" a similar dynamic is involved in nuclear physics. You might give that thought"

YES - that is my point - they are both bullshit backed up with an illusion of "science" - but no worries, I'm too busy selling supplements at the moment to do posts or read stuff, but I have a post in mind for later.



I do not think my comment means what you think it means.

Be well and prosper my friend.

Well feel free to clarify it!


Go read up on all this stuff before you declare any of it false. There's a great book that details this fraud of 'isolation' called Fear of the Invisible. There's numerous microbiologists and doctors who blew the whistle on this, and more will continue to do so no doubt. I wonder what you think about the Perth Group research.

Sounds like we are on the same page on this - I vaguely remember having some big trolling comment match with you over something I can't remember now, but sorry if I said your mother was a sheep.


If it was a trolling match I'm sure I reigned supreme, so I'm not worried if you resorted to calling my mother a sheep, I'd do the same thing if I was losing.

Bring it on punk - just kidding I have gone soft...


You are really serious about this?

Serious as in am I saying virus theory is utter bullshit? - yes 100%

Serious as in would I argue about it online? - no, I'd just post a meme...


The cure for corona virus - play this full volume: