Sustainability for Kids: law of markets

in challenge30days •  6 months ago

Earlier installments of this series on sustainability are posted here:
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6
Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12


The government's economic policies for the last hundred years have been all about putting consumption first – especially its “spend and tax” policy. But when consumption is put first, there can't be any natural checks or limits on our consumption, which pretty well explains why we're drowning in overconsumption.

For more sustainable economic policies, we really need to abandon this consumption-first theory. Our focus should be instead on a production-first theory: Say's Law.

Jean-Baptiste Say was a French economist writing in the early 1800s. He came up with a “law of markets” that we now refer to as Say's Law. The easiest way to state Say's Law is to say: Your supply constitutes your demand.

There has been some confusion, though, over what this actually means. Many people think Say's Law is saying that simply by making something, we create a demand for it. So if I produce 10 bars of soap, my new supply of soap will magically create a demand for this soap.

Or, my supply of X creates your demand for X.

But that's not what Say's Law means. Instead, it's saying that if I produce 10 bars of soap, I can now trade those bars of soap for money or other goods and that creates my demand for things that I want to buy.

Or, my supply of X creates my demand for Y.

In short, I have to produce before I consume.

So what does this have to do with sustainability? Say's Law shows how a free market naturally limits overconsumption by requiring that production happens before consumption.

In his book, A Treatise on Political Economy, Mr. Say explained it this way: “As each of us can only purchase the productions of others with his own productions – as the value we can buy is equal to the value we can produce, the more men can produce, the more they will purchase.”

On the flip side, the less men can produce, the less they will purchase. This is the natural limit on overconsumption in a free market! And the only way this natural limit is thwarted is when the government intervenes in markets.

Remember, the government intervenes with economic policies in order to stop market laws or forces from occurring. The government interferes with markets to protect big business from the market force of competition. And the government also tries to protect big business from Say's law of markets. Businesses don't like the law of markets because it's a natural constraint on their profits. They'd much rather see “spend and tax” policies, consumers using credit cards, and government policies that encourage people to spend rather than save.

In fact, if people were to save more of their money, they would be holding onto wealth and strengthening their position in the economy rather than strengthening the position of corporations. We'll explore more about the power of saving next time.


This article is one of a series I'm writing for the 30 Day Writing Challenge hosted by @dragosroua. If you want to join, write on a topic that interests you or that you'd like to learn more about and use the tag #challenge30days. As Dragos says, "The key word sequence here is: "write every day."


IOW COLOR LOGO.png

Think you'd like to wash up on our shore?
The treasure map will bring you right to our door!


IOWMap-1080pColour.png

logo designed and created by @pegasusphysics


[ cover art created with a pixabay.com image ]

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

It hits the nail on the head. Produce something people will find really useful and they will be happy to pay.

I am totally agreed with govt tries to protect big busniess point

·

Right? 😁

This is really a great thing you're taking on for the 30-day challenge. One of the things that often concerns me is that individuals in commercial situations get "trained" by governments and big business to believe that their production and trade "must" take the same greedy approach as that of giant corporations.

Something has gone "wrong" with the world, in the sense that nobody seems to understand what enough means. We live under the illusion that there is no "enough;" we must always seek more.

Thanks for your important work! Bright Blessings!

very good idea

·

Thanks kim!

As consumers we really do have alot of influence on what should or shouldn't happen, that is if we unite, be it environmental or economic sustainability it has to stem from us as individuals not the privy of governments or corporations.

Great post @geke, keep them coming!

·

Will do, though it's a little daunting to realize I'm not even halfway through the month for this series! lol

Consumer estimates have been a barrier to many countries. Many governments have become unsure of investing in various sectors. Fear of losing is so great that it makes these agenda discussed so as to prepare a weak response. Guaranteed investments are discussed in the media platforms and products of the debate offering a weak product.

I believe independent investments in use bring great prosperity to development.

I do agree with you @geke

Follow @erick23

great like your job!