Blogging, Social Media... and Steemit's "Coming of Age?"

in #blog6 years ago

We spend a lot of time here "in analysis" of what is going on and trying to determine what Steemit "could" and "should" do to make for a better future.

Maybe it's just human nature to believe that if we tweak something long enough, we'll derive a "magic formula" that somehow reveals precisely how to proceed, from that point forward.

"If I post this and that topic, in this and that format, I will succeed!"

007SedonaHSP.jpg
Red rocks near Sedona, AZ

But then what?

Let's imagine, for a moment, that Steemit IS a "Social Content Platform."

(Well, DUH!)

For a moment, let's set that aside from any thoughts of cryptocurrency and the ongoing debate as to what "quality content" means, or what "value" means, and so forth. Let us set aside the idea of "earning rewards," which inevitably clouds the issue.

What Do We DO on Social Platforms?

What do you DO, when you're on Facebook? On Instagram? On LinkedIn? On tumblr? On Reddit? On any number of of other social sites that could give a rat's ass about rewards? Where your "reward" is simply your creativity and interaction, for its own sake?

Why are you there?

Building a "Brand You?
Using the web in place of therapy?
Promoting your art?
Sharing with family?
Coping with loneliness?
Trolling because you feel powerless?
Developing a hobby?
Learning about an interest?
Polishing up your writing skills?
Looking for love in all the wrong places?
Part of a support group?
Distracting yourself from boredom?

What am I getting at here?

037SoundPersonalStandards.jpg
Evening clouds building...

Looking at the above list — all of which are "real things" people do on social media — it would be pretty evident that we can't just summarize "what people do on social media" with a single phrase.

Beyond that, some people post once every 30 days, some people post 300 times per day. Some people write dissertations, some communicate entirely in emojis.

What Does That Have to Do with Steemit?

A lot, actually.

Once the novelty of "creating content for rewards" wears off, people inevitably tend to settle into their usual routines.

I find this is increasingly true of myself, too. After two years, I'm less and less worried about whether I post every day and whether I am creating content that's likely to be popular. I have little idea what's on the Trending page, except for a cursory glance once a month or so... then then it only serves to confirm that my interests have zero bearing on what's evidently "popular," or PROMOTED as the case more likely is.

Rewards? I'm delighted if a post makes $15.00 or more, kinda bummed if it makes less and $1.00. Beyond that? I don't think about it.

Which ends up looping me back to a point my friend @whatsup has been making for some time: that the whole notion of Steemit as a showcase of "quality content" is not just impossible but also rather irrelevant, in the greater context of social media.

026FinchLearnExperience.jpg
Finch on the bird feeder

I mean, think about it: anywhere else you use social media, your focus is going to be either imparting a targeted message for a specific purpose (business/promotional) or just sharing whatever you feel like (personal) without much of a second thought.

In other words, social media really isn't about "quality" anything.

Without a specific mission statement to the contrary — like, "We're trying to copy what Medium is doing," — you don't get to control what social media "does."

You Can CHOOSE to Make it Quality!

Of course, you can choose to make your feed about your impression of quality content, but it's just not a "global" thing.

It is your thing.

So when I talk about Steemit "Coming of Age," I'm basically talking about the fact that we're increasingly settling into a place where people stop obsessing quite so much about "writing for rewards" and instead just do their own thing and trust that their ability to be "social" will automatically take care of their earning some rewards...or not.

Of course, the typical comeback is something along the lines of "Yeah, but what about the hideous TRENDING feed???" it leaves SUCH a bad impression...

042LakeGoodAtLike.jpg
Evening at Flathead Lake, Montana

And Then There's THAT...

Indeed, that is the pervasive elephant in the room.

Whereas I don't care (because I rarely look at it) the problem does remain that Trending is Steemit's de-facto "front window to the outer world." It's what you get to see as "representing" the community when you're not logged in, which would be the status of the general public visiting Steemit.

It's also one of the reasons I really don't like promoting Steemit. Even if I send a friend a link to one of MY posts, odds are they'll click on Trending and see the ocean of overpriced mediocrity that dwells there and think I've lost my good sense for recommending this place. Lost sale, bada-bing. Lost credibility for me, bada-double-bing.

In an Ideal World...

... Steemit, Inc. and the devs would get together and completely get rid of "Trending," still allow people to promote the heck out of their posts with bidbots, set up a team of "Community Moderators" (along the lines of what new Steemit clone/upstart Weku is doing), rename the "Trending" tab to "Best of Steemit" and make it so that only hand curated content selected by the moderator team ends up there.

063LeafWhereBeliefs.jpg
Water droplets on fall leaves

Farm it out to trusted teams like @curie, @qurator and @c-squared.

"But I paid $400 to bid bots! I want my stuff to be VISIBLE!"

Absolutely!

Your bidding contest will put your $700 post precisely where it belongs: In "Promoted Content."

Because that's what it IS — PROMOTED CONTENT.

Not sure why everyone is so afraid of saying that. Facebook has it. Twitter has it. Most places have it. I find it ironic that we pretend to value "honesty and transparency" so much on Steemit... and yet this one thing is treated like a hot potato.

Well, that's all I have to say about that!

How about YOU? Do you think Steemit is starting to "come of age?" Do you agree that social media rarely is about "quality?" What do you think about "adding value" vs. "quality content?" Are we each responsible for our own impression of "quality?" Given that 99% of people on this platform probably earn less than $10 a month, are we wasting too much energy worrying about content "should" look like, to get rewarded? Leave a comment-- share your experiences-- be part of the conversation!

xxBloggers.jpg

(As always, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly for Steemit)
Created at 181021 16:34 PDT

Sort:  

I think you put your finger on it...with all of the bots affecting the Trending feed, it truly is Promoted content, and not being labeled as such. It feels dishonest. (Also, as a relative N00b, what the heck is the difference between Trending and Hot?)

Hi Rosemary, thanks for the comment... and yet it does feel dishonest.

In a "truthful" incarnation, "Trending" allegedly represents the most widely read and upvoted posts on the site. "Hot" is more about posts that are recent and got a lot of initial attention. At least that's how it is supposed to work. Except the whole picture has been rather skewed by the bidbots, because you can buy yourself onto Trending.

Thank you for the explanation! I have been baffled over that for a bit.

Because that's what it IS — PROMOTED CONTENT.

That's a really good point. It's almost like they are confusing "going viral" with playing an ad on millions of webpages. If you pay for something to "go viral" most other places on the web, people see right through it, because it will have "Video will play after ad" or "Promoted content" slathered all over it. The fact that on Steemit you can pay to be in the same space as a genuinely successful homegrown post is kinda off putting.

But I do like your broader commentary on just making your blog into whatever you want it to be.

because it will have "Video will play after ad" or "Promoted content" slathered all over it.

Precisely my point. And there's a certain irony in that, in the sense that Steemit was built on this whole "freedom" and "non-censorship" thing... transparency.

And then we're basically hiding that a bunch of people pay $100s to make themselves look popular. No... your shit isn't "popular," it's just promoted to the heavens to appear that way.

I've always thought that was bogus.

I also think people should be completely free to buy as many bidbot votes as they want... that's their issue and choice. But let's call a spade a spade.

odds are they'll click on Trending and see the ocean of overpriced mediocrity that dwells there and think I've lost my good sense for recommending this place. Lost sale, bada-bing. Lost credibility for me, bada-double-bing.

maybe we should get rid of "Trending"

Your point is that we should make of Steemit what we as individuals want to contribute...Trending is simply the catalog of bid-bots and circle-jerkers

...and it wouldn't matter if it wasn't..."Trending" is never going to appeal to everyone anyhow!

Can't wait for communities to be implemented, it may help get newbs pointed in a more relevant to them picture of Steemit than "trending" could ever do

Excellent post, thank you!

Thanks Steve.

Yes, let's get rid of Trending. Or rename it "Richlist," and make it completely separate tab from a "best of Steemit" that ONLY includes hand curated content chosen by trusted teams of community members. As I suggest in the main text, farm it out to @curie, @qurator and @c-squared... they all have manual curators who do have a clue. Make "Best of Steemit" actually mean something...

goes back to the basic problem, tho...hmmm, actually two of em...

  • "Best of" doesn't appeal to all users; especially as niches get farther from the norm
  • someone has to curate, and that someone centralizes power by choosing what gets rewarded

I don't blame the devs on this, it's just the way the baby bounces, and I'm not sorry we are still in Beta; there are still things on the community-sharing side that need to be looked at (crosses fingers...communities)

Drop Trending and go with a list of tags by alphabet? (can be gamed), by popularity (gamed big-time!), or something else (that can be gamed ;>)

No easy answers

maybe we should get rid of "Trending"
works for me.

ditto.
I'd (and have) be doing the same thing on FunnyBook for free.

until you got banned for disrupting the narrative ;>

Everitt is very good at that. The Powers That Be hate having their paradigms questioned... boo-hoo-hoo....

I think they have cooked their own goose by going to far, but, like the story says...we shall see

Yep. Of course, I'm spending less time on Farcebook since the "whining index" mooned when Trump was elected President. Hurts my ears... well, not ears, but I'm sure you grok what I'm saying.

Great post! I agree with everything you just wrote.

I took a long pause from Steemit because I felt that I hadn't something of value to share, because of that "quality content" premise. So I went back to Facebook and such. I realized that gaining votes for money wasn't worth it. The important thing is interaction. Being social. Be heard. No one should judge if it's bad that a meme gets to trend because it isn't quality content. So we see a lot of things here that are of no interest to most people and we ask ourselves if it's really a place for us. And there's the Steemit UI that lacks some development of course.

Well, so now I decided to come back and do really what I feel is natural for me: Short thoughts, upload pictures using @share2steem, and write longer posts when i feel to.

If we want to go big, we have to keep it simple for the common user. Not trying to be like Medium.

And they say there are no coincidences. I was reading about @stevescoins Halloween contest. Your blog was a resteem. It asked a question I've been thinking about. Why am I here?

I looked at your list and really didn't see one that described my motivation. I like Steemit because it is less political than Twitter, and less tribal. It is less grasping (intrusive) than Facebook. Less commercial than Linked in. Certainly less public than Instagram. Having a blog, which I did for years, is satisfying, but not as dynamic and is more self-absorbed.

Steemit's not perfect, but after a while I learned how to look for stuff that interested me. If you can't find something interesting here, you can't find it anywhere. As long as my interest was genuine, I was able to connect with people who were interested in what I had to write. And I love to write. So Steemit has become a kind of laboratory for developing and discovering ideas. Again, it's not perfect. Certainly the rewards are not fairly distributed. That can be discouraging. But I've been in jobs where rewards were not distributed fairly either. That's life.

Now, to get back to @stevescoins Halloween Contest. This is a perfect illustration of why I'm here. I've written a story. He's willing to read it. Maybe I'll get a prize and maybe I won't. He's tied his story in with @calluna's tellastorytome contest. I know she'll read my story and give me feedback. Again, dynamic. A laboratory for creativity. I learned about @stevescoins because I wrote a couple of things for @calluna. And I learned about @calluna because I've written stuff for @f3nix's finishthestory contest. And I learned about that because... you see what I mean? Dynamic.

That's why I'm on Steemit. And there's always the chance that my account actually might be worth something someday.

As far as promoting content goes--I wouldn't get involved. I hope my account and my presence grow organically here. That would be gratifying.

Hope I didn't go longer than you wanted. Thanks for asking :)

it used to be a lot more like this dynamic here on Steem...good days for sure!

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.12
JST 0.027
BTC 63049.68
ETH 3022.53
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50