TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2018.12.03-2018.12.09)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

6686 authors published their rewarded comments during this week.

8838 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

192253 votes were made during this week.

9300,33 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.

---

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2018.12.03-2018.12.09)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@musing	1832	224	3	1258,01	13,53	42,15
2	@steemhunt	2183	159	1	798,05	8,58	18,98
3	@nathanmars	2044	500	1	137,53	1,48	10,28
4	@utopian-io	148	37	8	936,23	10,07	5,18
5	@gentlebot	770	324	15	78,45	0,84	3,8
6	@dimimp	107	34	100	158,94	1,71	0,81
7	@sndbox	88	71	10	49,89	0,54	0,53
8	@trafalgar	165	15	9	228,61	2,46	0,51
9	@sniffnscurry	258	50	4	58,71	0,63	0,44
10	@acidyo	146	112	3	24,85	0,27	0,42
11	@fundition	16	8	100	287,07	3,09	0,34
12	@crypto.piotr	730	272	11	7,25	0,08	0,29
13	@theycallmedan	108	85	1	21,02	0,23	0,27
14	@chbartist	274	109	13	16,83	0,18	0,27
15	@adetorrent	102	64	23	24,29	0,26	0,23
16	@rok-sivante	86	14	82	103,49	1,11	0,22
17	@balte	371	97	14	14,56	0,16	0,21
18	@czechglobalhosts	116	44	5	31,28	0,34	0,21
19	@jaki01	115	76	11	18,24	0,2	0,21
20	@r2cornell	127	103	26	12,97	0,14	0,2
21	@rahemanali	74	49	100	22,52	0,24	0,17
22	@cron	94	16	64	66,96	0,72	0,16
23	@double-u	406	42	15	23,58	0,25	0,15
24	@smartvote	112	23	17	43,06	0,46	0,15
25	@sharonomics	75	49	100	17	0,18	0,12
26	@gooddream	102	48	39	15,97	0,17	0,11
27	@whatsup	233	115	14	6,67	0,07	0,11
28	@dstors	68	51	6	14,47	0,16	0,11
29	@rawutah	121	46	48	16,28	0,18	0,11
30	@adm	803	2	5	340,71	3,66	0,1
31	@tasteem	89	12	3	55,99	0,6	0,1
32	@cleanplanet	35	25	100	24,69	0,27	0,09
33	@pinkspectre	115	46	99	12,93	0,14	0,09
34	@xpilar	199	72	7	8,19	0,09	0,09
35	@donkeypong	42	36	6	16,07	0,17	0,09
36	@oracle-d	37	36	1	15,07	0,16	0,08
37	@noaommerrr	100	7	100	72,87	0,78	0,08
38	@abh12345	206	111	6	4,85	0,05	0,08
39	@hiroyamagishi	84	17	89	31,5	0,34	0,08
40	@shaka	76	53	6	9,89	0,11	0,08
41	@bbana	63	38	17	9,93	0,11	0,06
42	@firepower	68	50	5	8,3	0,09	0,06
43	@ngc	42	22	6	18,63	0,2	0,06
44	@anomadsoul	55	50	3	8,3	0,09	0,06
45	@pixelfan	573	51	8	7,88	0,08	0,06
46	@shortsegments	76	23	60	16,94	0,18	0,06
47	@s4s	45	38	8	11,08	0,12	0,06
48	@ikrahch	86	54	45	6,65	0,07	0,05
49	@argalf	341	87	8	4,06	0,04	0,05
50	@cjsdns	139	29	10	11,21	0,12	0,05
51	@promisteem	30	13	90	23,88	0,26	0,05
52	@nanzo-scoop	24	17	55	19,08	0,21	0,05
53	@mattclarke	88	48	29	7,26	0,08	0,05
54	@reflektor	84	42	11	7,86	0,08	0,05
55	@novacadian	113	71	46	4,31	0,05	0,05
56	@hanshotfirst	21	11	58	29,93	0,32	0,05
57	@tarazkp	182	74	5	4,07	0,04	0,05
58	@frogcake	70	12	100	29,66	0,32	0,05
59	@reiseamateur	117	57	25	5,84	0,06	0,05
60	@ulfr	80	14	63	17,06	0,18	0,04
61	@hebrew	58	57	18	4,22	0,05	0,04
62	@exyle	93	64	1	4,49	0,05	0,04
63	@steevc	176	95	13	3,13	0,03	0,04
64	@sorin.cristescu	66	48	24	5,28	0,06	0,04
65	@payforplay	54	5	100	47,27	0,51	0,04
66	@travellit	78	27	35	9,38	0,1	0,04
67	@gardenofeden	64	4	98	68,57	0,74	0,04
68	@meno	103	75	12	3,2	0,03	0,04
69	@coruscate	96	73	9	3,39	0,04	0,04
70	@mbp	45	38	8	6,44	0,07	0,04
71	@steemjetrecords	35	15	84	16,73	0,18	0,04
72	@streetstyle	75	38	16	6,2	0,07	0,04
73	@jeenger	88	48	44	5,42	0,06	0,04
74	@steemflagrewards	181	20	27	14,01	0,15	0,04
75	@lotto-austria	132	62	27	4,23	0,05	0,04
76	@extrospect	49	2	98	120,32	1,29	0,04
77	@fyrstikken	27	20	96	12,49	0,13	0,04
78	@steem-ua	10	9	49	30,99	0,33	0,04
79	@prosperist	75	49	100	5,26	0,06	0,04
80	@jungjunghoon	139	59	18	3,13	0,03	0,03
81	@broncnutz	66	37	2	4,61	0,05	0,03
82	@himapan	218	58	6	3,55	0,04	0,03
83	@tibfox	93	68	26	2,69	0,03	0,03
84	@neoxian	83	33	5	6,45	0,07	0,03
85	@supergiant	27	16	79	14,46	0,16	0,03
86	@mightypanda	135	36	60	6,13	0,07	0,03
87	@d00k13	159	69	31	2,93	0,03	0,03
88	@ntopaz	59	10	12	22,77	0,24	0,03
89	@jrcornel	59	3	95	64,65	0,7	0,03
90	@papa-pepper	44	35	100	5,8	0,06	0,03
91	@jeezzle	75	26	60	8,45	0,09	0,03
92	@onceuponatime	64	38	4	4,69	0,05	0,03
93	@aamirijaz	93	52	22	3,64	0,04	0,03
94	@socky	23	13	41	16,97	0,18	0,03
95	@whatageek	35	30	50	6,64	0,07	0,03
96	@jingdol	50	17	71	13,5	0,15	0,03
97	@chireerocks	101	66	18	3,1	0,03	0,03
98	@joeypark	64	9	71	20,45	0,22	0,03
99	@hingsten	76	41	14	5,52	0,06	0,03
100	@rehan12	120	70	11	2,59	0,03	0,03
101	@nonameslefttouse	89	44	10	4,13	0,04	0,03
102	@stackin	139	76	6	2,24	0,02	0,03
103	@cryptohustlin	566	214	7	0,93	0,01	0,03
104	@benadam	73	48	100	3,64	0,04	0,03
105	@robertandrew	73	44	87	4,98	0,05	0,03
106	@lordoftruth	90	53	100	4,37	0,05	0,03
107	@riosparada	63	8	100	18,37	0,2	0,02
108	@djohan	87	16	75	7,64	0,08	0,02
109	@sjchoi	31	15	100	6,94	0,07	0,02
110	@steamsteem	68	13	70	8,99	0,1	0,02
111	@krnel	71	48	5	2,35	0,03	0,02
112	@dragosroua	73	40	20	2,97	0,03	0,02
113	@adsactly	51	18	1	8,65	0,09	0,02
114	@clumsysilverdad	110	81	13	1,31	0,01	0,02
115	@suonghuynh	31	1	82	163,5	1,76	0,02
116	@therealwolf	27	25	38	4,84	0,05	0,02
117	@demotruk	42	2	95	60,37	0,65	0,02
118	@dswigle	162	59	51	1,95	0,02	0,02
119	@coingecko	25	19	51	5,67	0,06	0,02
120	@betgames	59	5	100	21,1	0,23	0,02
121	@doomsdaychassis	62	33	75	3,28	0,04	0,02
122	@goldmatters	92	32	4	4,12	0,04	0,02
123	@majes.tytyty	127	26	7	5,1	0,05	0,02
124	@laodr	74	39	46	2,78	0,03	0,02
125	@josediccus	123	47	11	2,27	0,02	0,02
126	@bitbulls	75	48	100	2,63	0,03	0,02
127	@master-set	60	14	76	7,81	0,08	0,02
128	@glenalbrethsen	118	62	18	2,43	0,03	0,02
129	@meesterboom	157	59	3	2,65	0,03	0,02
130	@reazuliqbal	2441	191	3	0,85	0,01	0,02
131	@br0	42	11	97	11,44	0,12	0,02
132	@lyndsaybowes	99	56	24	2,98	0,03	0,02
133	@l-s-h	53	22	44	7,33	0,08	0,02
134	@sultan-aceh	176	40	24	3,49	0,04	0,02
135	@newageinv	79	45	27	3,71	0,04	0,02
136	@runicar	56	41	22	2,57	0,03	0,02
137	@saramiller	55	5	96	28,92	0,31	0,02
138	@superhardness	71	1	94	140,27	1,51	0,02
139	@bippe	89	52	17	2,76	0,03	0,02
140	@englishtchrivy	64	18	82	6,3	0,07	0,02
141	@bigpower	103	53	17	2,05	0,02	0,02
142	@mmmmkkkk311	14	13	29	11,6	0,12	0,02
143	@jwolf	92	60	68	2,47	0,03	0,02
144	@organduo	98	51	5	2,76	0,03	0,02
145	@foles09	1011	212	7	0,65	0,01	0,02
146	@steemshiro	66	30	86	5,13	0,06	0,02
147	@surpassinggoogle	44	29	12	4,17	0,04	0,02
148	@paulag	49	32	23	1,39	0,01	0,01
149	@lazarescu.irinel	135	69	100	1,16	0,01	0,01
150	@tommyl33	151	99	21	0,46	0	0,01
151	@mawahab	80	54	64	1,62	0,02	0,01
152	@partiko	24	22	3	2,99	0,03	0,01
153	@revisesociology	68	38	19	1,69	0,02	0,01
154	@cryptospa	150	68	17	1,07	0,01	0,01
155	@shikika	23	13	99	2,65	0,03	0,01
156	@encryptdcouple	94	58	100	0,83	0,01	0,01
157	@dosdudes	55	30	90	2,05	0,02	0,01
158	@sindong	63	34	15	1,25	0,01	0,01
159	@marketingmonk	32	16	67	6,24	0,07	0,01
160	@d-pend	40	12	7	4,25	0,05	0,01
161	@mermaidvampire	90	46	33	1,39	0,01	0,01
162	@valth	45	32	43	1,82	0,02	0,01
163	@block-power	39	21	79	3,26	0,04	0,01
164	@resiliencia	45	26	41	3,77	0,04	0,01
165	@silver-hammer	39	17	2	2,22	0,02	0,01
166	@armentor	27	9	61	4,27	0,05	0,01
167	@cyberrn	23	13	37	3,08	0,03	0,01
168	@ezzy	19	14	23	6,75	0,07	0,01
169	@sallybeth23	76	39	90	1,41	0,02	0,01
170	@bananafish	49	20	87	2,31	0,02	0,01
171	@thedamus	123	37	50	1,59	0,02	0,01
172	@steemchiller	41	35	90	2,3	0,02	0,01
173	@theaustrianguy	21	20	40	4,07	0,04	0,01
174	@itchyfeetdonica	53	28	48	1,87	0,02	0,01
175	@super8ballclub	70	1	100	54,9	0,59	0,01
176	@discernente	96	6	94	13,73	0,15	0,01
177	@lichtblick	59	25	9	1,98	0,02	0,01
178	@moomoo2018	66	10	100	3,53	0,04	0,01
179	@amosbastian	133	36	16	2,44	0,03	0,01
180	@steemyoda	28	4	40	9,21	0,1	0,01
181	@upyourpost	86	7	24	9,68	0,1	0,01
182	@chriddi	80	42	31	1,82	0,02	0,01
183	@daan	53	41	84	1,61	0,02	0,01
184	@peterpa	175	46	31	1,74	0,02	0,01
185	@em3	63	20	71	2,32	0,02	0,01
186	@ogst0311	54	15	54	5,54	0,06	0,01
187	@toofasteddie	75	46	18	0,77	0,01	0,01
188	@vikisecrets	63	29	12	2,59	0,03	0,01
189	@jaff8	49	25	45	1,89	0,02	0,01
190	@comedyopenmic	44	1	100	41,82	0,45	0,01
191	@gank	29	12	100	6,94	0,07	0,01
192	@rynow	90	30	7	1,98	0,02	0,01
193	@maikuraki	44	26	100	2,08	0,02	0,01
194	@everlove	26	10	38	4,1	0,04	0,01
195	@bullionstackers	47	23	23	2,96	0,03	0,01
196	@blewitt	49	40	16	1,2	0,01	0,01
197	@simonjay	229	22	23	3,05	0,03	0,01
198	@diana.feuerberg	39	21	48	1,75	0,02	0,01
199	@roleerob	68	36	35	1,57	0,02	0,01
200	@wdev	50	29	63	1,39	0,01	0,01

---

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@dustsweeper	1575	396	6	31,51	0,34	1,87
2	@dustbunny	505	288	10	6,9	0,07	0,3
3	@tipu	20	16	16	74,76	0,8	0,18
4	@minnowpond	462	163	4	4,88	0,05	0,12
5	@booster	12	12	7	38,2	0,41	0,07
6	@boomerang	13	8	25	51,45	0,55	0,06
7	@minnowvotes	68	7	4	16,86	0,18	0,02
8	@emrebeyler	90	19	6	4,4	0,05	0,01
9	@treeplanter	24	8	48	6,34	0,07	0,01
10	@lays	26	4	96	8,43	0,09	0,01

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

---

_{Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )}