I just quit working for dutch whistleblower Ronald Bernard – here's why
When I saw the testimony of Ronald Bernard this spring I was very moved. Like millions of people around the world. I immidiately sent an application to work for his foundation. Ronald himself answered and forwarded me to the man who would become my supervisor after a short job interview via skype. It was the best job interview I ever had. We briefly talked about my skills and what I could offer. After that we talked about conspiracy theories for around an hour. I got on board quickly and started working on a video for the foundation.
I had watched the original dutch video. But when I saw the video getting translated into so many languages soon after the release and how many english speaking youtube channels were sharing this content I got suspicious about it. So I started investigating a few things.
Ronald Bernard and his so called first life
Bernard claims he worked as an entrepreneur in what he calls his first life. I never called it that but I am living something like a second life as well so I have some kind of idea what someone means who says so. I have been working as a journalist and if I would give you my real name you could check it out and find evidence to this claim. Just because I found out some terrible facts about msm and "ended" my life as their supporter, there is no way to delete my first life from the internet. You could find out easily. However, when you search the internet for Bernards name before 2013, you won't find anything. He says he had his own fashion line. Seems like this was some kind of secret brand because Bernard has never been to any fashion exposition or show, he never registered a fashion company under his name and his name is in no way connected to any kind of fashion label whatsoever. Same thing goes for selling cars, in&export and his work in the textile field.
He called himself one of the big players. But there has never been any mention anywhere. I can't find any registered firm to his name. Like I said before I have been working as a journalist but I never failed so hard in finding out anything about a person. Either he wasn't as successful as he claims or he just lies.
"You can ask me anything"
I wrote a mail to my supervisor about my concerns. It took him over two weeks to
answer my questions get back to me. He told me that this video would answer all of my questions.
Unfortunatelly this video didn't even help a bit because his answer was evasive.
– First he says, he has no CV because he was an entrepreneur. Maybe he never needed one but he could just produce one. It's not very hard to write down one's jobs.
– Further he says he couldn't claim names for his safety and the safety of other people. Noone ever asked for names. People like me (who even supported him) just want to know the positions in which he worked for which projects and some kind of references for his work. Everyone can do that without naming anybody.
– next he asks how bad we want him to paint himself as a mad man. Where is this idea coming from? We know he did bad things. He told us so. But WHAT did he do?
– at last he confuses two groups of people and asserts that those who wanted to see evidence about his working place wouldn't believe in his horrific claims about the powers in place.
Well, I don't only believe in ritual abuse, I know that it's true. Because I investigated and tried to write about it, but noone would let me. And you can be certain about one thing: No article holds more truth than the one that noone wants to publish. I am not one of his critics. I applied for a job, I offered my help, I trusted.
Already a pop phenomenon?
Next problem: We know there are ways to oppress informations. I think that's what we know best, right?! It is always suspicious when someone gets that popular. The search term "Ronald Bernard" on youtube spits out almost 15,000 hits. This happened in the last 5 months …Why wouldn't youtube ban those videos like they do with so many content right now? Why does noone stop Bernard while he reaches so many people? If he would be a real threat because his informations were so dangerous he wouldn't be able to have this platform, would he? And who were those who helped out giving him such a great audience? As far as I could find out this was the channel that published the video in the U.S. at first (17th of April 2017):
Smash 240. This channel doesn't exist anymore and I can't find anything else about smash240. As if he would have only existed for this purpose. Every reference I find online is just about him sharing the video with Ronald Bernard.
Although this channel had no career whatsoever (just a handful af subscribers that you would think come from exactly this video) the video got shared from there. All you can find is another channel called Smash240 on vidme. If it is the same guy he is definitely disinfo because all that he shares is just that: Disinfo.
One of the most famous first multiplicators was Robert David Steel's Public Intelligence Blog. Mind the odd wording. Steel is former (?) CIA and definitely disinfo. He works with people like Alex Jones and George Webb. Robert David Steele can't be trusted and the first one who shared the info can't be trusted either. Getting famous like that in such a short time and even supported by those who work for Intelligence operations, … that's odd.
Ronald Bernard wasn't asked to name names. He was asked to give ANY references about his work. It's possible to do that without harming anyone. And I should be able to find something about his first life, because I just never failed in researching anybody. I can't trust him anymore because I do trust in my own abilities a lot.