Why The Corona-Virus Probably Doesn't Exist | 3/4 - How The Bet Ended & More About The Claims (feat. Virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka)

Continuing my miniseries on Stefan Lanka's claims about the non-existence of the measles virus and pathogenic viruses in general - which includes the notorious "Corona-Virus". If you want to catch up you can read part 1 and part 2.

A word on how Lanka's bet ended:

Naturally, a young doctor from Germany named Mr. Bardens came to collect Lanka's prize money of 100 000 Euro and offered what he called "evidence" for the existence of the measles virus to Lanka. As you can imagine the so-called evidence did not include and fulfill the requirements specifically asked for by the German infection-protection law and the contest rules, such as the photography of the isolated virus as specifically laid out by Lanka's competition.

After Lanka rejected the unsatisfactory "evidence" Bardens had provided, the young doctor sued Lanka for the prize money to be handed over. The argument went to court and became a judicial case which is precisely what Lanka had hoped for - because in the public few items get as much attention as major court cases on fundamentals do; like the question if the pathogenic measles virus actually exists at all... Mind you there are countless vaccinations for measles every single day and it's a giant industry with wide implications for our health. Were the cause entirely different than a pathogenic virus, the entire industry would go belly-up.

As was to be expected, the court sided with the young doctor and told Lanka to pay the prize money. Lanka - as sure of his position as ever - rejected the court's decision and the entire thing went to a higher instance to be judged on again. In the end the court decided that Bardens had not fulfilled the requirements for proving the Measle-virus' existence as laid out specifically by Lanka and his referencing the German infection-protection law, and the case was won by Lanka.

As far as I know neither has anyone else tried to claim that he can prove the existence of the measles virus nor has anything else really come after it again, implying that it's much harder than expected to prove the existence of said pathogen we are all so sure must exist somewhere. It could also imply that Lanka is right and that there is no such thing as a pathogenic virus that causes measles, only artist renderings and photographs of other small organic structures under a microscope.

Some further explanations:

Now, I am aware that this opens up a huge array of questions and objections so I want to do my best here to elaborate a bit on how Lanka explains the condition known as measles, what he specifically claims and what he specifically doesn't claim. Please bear in my mind that I am doing my own studies on the matter and nothing here should replace your own research.

First of all Lanka does not doubt that diseases like measles, smallpox, malaria and so forth exist. As far as he is concerned these conditions are not only real but affect the lives of many on a daily basis. He even states that some of these conditions - if they have advanced too far and are critical in the individual case - may require and warrant certain emergency measures within school medicine to avoid fatalities.

Further Lanka does not doubt the existence of viruses per se. He is a trained virologist and has studied and worked with viruses for decades, also being the discoverer of the first "megavirus" found in the oceans.

What Lanka claims however is that viruses are not and cannot be the cause for disease. Rather viruses are essential and benign biological structures that ultimately spring life into existence on a biological level and that viruses thus are "nothing to be worried about at all!"

Rather what Lanka wants to point out is that the narrative of pathogens, of tiny agents that infiltrate our body to multiply their own hazardous code within us is a fairytale that is not supported by the evidence and that - in fact - the entire history of infection-theory started as a scientific mistake based on superstitious assumptions and became a political weapon used as geopolitical leverage between nations in times of conflict.

What started as a mistake has not only become an agenda but a giant congame today that is threatening the health and existence of mankind as a whole due to all its implications and resulting measures like vaccinations based on an entirely unfactual concept, namely the concept of competition and war in microbiology rather than an understanding of the interrelatedness and symbiosis between all moving parts within and outside of the body. If I may be so blunt as to summarize...

As Lanka is asked in part 2 of this series: "how then do you explain the existence of measles if a virus is not responsible for its outbreak?" And he says:

"Simple, the way we have explained it before this whole charade of infection and contagion was dreamt up, the way traditional chinese and ayurvedic medicine explain them where pathogens and material contagion simply do not exist. We get sick and show major symptoms - like what we refer to as "measles" - because of a poisoning of the body from the inside or the outside. This could be related to an overuse of petro-chemical cosmetic products or a whole array of substances our bodies treat as toxins and want to get rid of. Our skin cleans us, our skin detoxifies us and if the body can't get rid rid of the toxins through the kidneys and bladder it will use the skin to throw the toxins out of its system. The kidneys really are the most important thing to remain health:, if they can't do their job properly your body will use all its ways to get rid of toxins another way.

Another essential aspect of disease and health is our mental state, meaning psychosomatic effects play a huge role. For example: measles often breaks out within a school or kindergarten but is only limited to one classroom rather than infecting the entire school. If you dig deep enough you will find that often there has been a departure of a teacher who was generally loved and adored by the kids, who may have been really close to them - a sort of mother substitute - and when she leaves the kids who are affected by this emotional upset will get "thin-skinned" and react on y physical level.

The healing phase we eventually witness is generally called "measles" but has nothing to do with catching some rogue virus that infects our system."

I feel I want to leave it at that today, but I will give you some further pointers in the final part of this miniseries, good research items to start out with to get an overview how a scinetific scam of this magnitude could even be possible and how eroded the scientific basis for infection-theory actually is that we all believe so rigorously. I also want to share some of Lanka's bits of advice not to believe anyone (including him) but rather to study the material yourself in order to reach your own conclusions. He sticks by his statements and has done so for years... and considering the detail-obsessed dialogue on contagion and pandemics, this is highly relevant and astounding, don't you think?

_{Img srcs:unsplash.com
unsplash.com
unsplash.com
unsplash.com}

Thanks for stopping by <3