How Image Plagiarism Changed How Art Posts are Made in Steem

in utopian-io •  4 months ago

The objective of this post is to share how image plagiarism has affected the posting habits of artists in the Steem Blockchain. The statements provided in this post are based from my observations.

Summary of the Post:

Background/Inspiration of the Post
Case Example
The Trend of Adding Process Shots
How Does the Phenomenon Affect Curation Efforts?
Conclusion


Background:

I have been posting my line arts in the platform for almost a year now. I didn’t realize the depth of why process shots mattered when posting on the blockchain. It was only when I got fed up with explaining the process of how I do my content. You can see that my recent works have less words written on them as much as I used to. Should I even be going the extra mile to prove that I created my own content?

The thought just stayed with me as I reevaluated my old posts. I’m not really fond of explaining the process of my works. They are self explanatory most of the time. But do I need something added to the main content to let people know I created them? Why do I even want to stretch the post when the attention span of most internet users are already limited?

The prevalent reason is trying to prove to people I made my own content. It is only this place and personal blogs that I see artists showcase their process shots as part of the content. I don’t often get to see that on other arts sites. So why the trend?

Apparently, the habit is a precautionary measure to prevent people from putting some doubt in my content. Image plagiarism in the platform is rampant and continues to exist despite efforts to stomp out fraud visual artists. #photography #foodphotography #art and other visual art related tag contains a lot of authors that fake their content. They rob the real content owners of recognition and rewards they deserve and worked hard for.


I have used this case on my previous post and will use it again because it’s a perfect example of the problem.

The owner of that account has been confirmed to have created several accounts and plagiarized art content. Fakes that are caught with a simple reverse image search from Google have little creativity to hide their abuse. But the good ones are those that hardly get caught.

All it takes is some time learning how to filter photos in an editing software and clear out brand marks that could lead people to suspect it ain’t your content. Successful plagiarists are not the ones you can catch with an SEO verification tool. These are content fakers that intentionally copy and alter some other person’s content and claim it as their own.


Process Shots Adding Value to a Post

Explaining their process should come easy to the artist creating their art. In theory, this makes perfect sense but then not everyone is gifted with technical skills in writing their thoughts well. I myself had trouble explaining how I create my content from the beginning. Drawing has been my hobby for the longest time and I’m at the point where I don’t need to actively think about how I’m going to approach the piece. I just let my hand do its thing often and make some edits if necessary.

Now one might ask, if an artist includes process shots on the post, will that protect their work from potential plagiarists? Well, not entirely. These fakers are getting better and better at the crime of stealing original works and pose as the original creator. You can take this post for example.

This was easier to catch because this plagiarist copied the entire process shots. The fraud became easier to detect. For artists making original works, it would be easier to make a little bit of description on the process you made. You can showcase your technical knowledge about the art process you are employing in your work, again, proving the originality of your art.

Aside from proving your work is an original, process shots also add flare to the post as it builds up some anticipation and helps other artists to learn from your techniques. It brings the audience, artist or not, into the journey of your msterpiece. It is certainly more appealing compared to a post with a single photo.


How Does This Affect Curation Efforts?

Between two unknown artists that recently started out in the platform, one that only posts a single photo over one that consistently posts process shots, which one can convince a curator to tell they are the real deal without a reverse image done?

The last thing any self respecting curator would want is upvoting a plagiarized content. Curators would naturally not want to spend a long time deciding over content that bears some red flags. Process shots look more appealing to the post and establishes some degree of credibility. Add a few paragraphs here and there and the content becomes high quality.

Good curators would still consider authors with single image posts for upvotes, granted that these authors have other means to prove they are legit. I’d like to think that not posting process shots does not put other artists at a disadvantage with curation. Maybe it’s just my bias that I happen to get more curators noticing since I started posting process shots. This blockchain is the only place I posted my art works. I know I should have started building a profile from other art sites to get my name out there but this is just hobby blogging.

Artists need to learn how to add process shots to their posts to be competitive in the platform. I personally don’t like this idea but it’s what works unless artists have an established reputation somewhere else. I am a firm believer that artists should be free to post however they like and let curators see value in their works. But for most unknown artists out there, process shots are a step to get some credibility in this blockchain until you have proven your name time and time again.


Conclusion

If tolerated, image plagiarism in the blockchain makes this platform less attractive for content creators. It is understandable that no one could stop anyone from posting a copy paste text or photo but it’s another thing to reward them for doing no effort at all. As an adaptive strategy, including process shots on an artist’s post has more benefits on both the artist and the audience.

It’s also worth mentioning the tools I used for detecting image plagiarism include Google Reverse image search, Tineye, and NooBox. But these tools are no substitute for critical thinking. If you have a gut feeling that the artist is fake, pursue that thought and investigate to prove you’re wrong. It’s better to investigate thinking that you are the one doubting your hunches so as not to be blindsided about plagiarism when there isn’t any.

Reverse image searches are really helpful but even these also fail. Check out the watermarks in the art of areas where the image seemed cropped. Check is the quality of the image shared is low/pixelated because those are signs that the image might be screenshot of taken somewhere not from the original creator. There’s not one hit solution in fighting abuse and I think abuse fighter should be as creative as offenders in their fight.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Greetings @adamada!

Image plagiarism is one of the more difficult abuse to detect with efficiency.

I applaud artists for the extra effort they put in to let the audience know their authenticity. I also commend art curators for their efforts to keep the field original as possible. These are crucial as curation initiatives despise handing out votes to undeserving persons.

Artists sink time and creative energy into their works. I could imagine the demotivation that comes along with having your work stolen.

As you have mentioned, there are tools to help spot abuse. But, a crafty abuser still manages to pass off someone else's work as their own. You have advised people to use critical thinking when approaching probable abuse. This is important as plagiarism is a serious accusation.

Like image plagiarism, the same parallel exists for content on @dtube and @dsound.

Good curators are hard to find. I am sure the community you serve in appreciate your service.


Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.


Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]

·

Thank you for compliments enforcer48-kun. May your efforts to evaluate for utopian are as valuable as the contributions that it brings.

In some parallel universe, leokitty happened. May you find better happiness than that in this New Year Yeet. :D

·
·

The same to you.

In some parallel universe, leokitty happened.

We may never know.

·

Thank you for your review, @enforcer48! Keep up the good work!

excellent post, good explanation

Disgusting! Thanks a lot for the info. I just made my first post here last week, and I added some thought-process, never thought of the process steps being appreciated and being a source of credibility. I don't like to be taking snapshots of the work in progress, I just like to loose myself in the drawing or painting without the burden of thinking in anything else. I post most of my personal stuff as cc-0 in opengameart haha now I think... i'm very naive 'cause I usually post the source.

·

I think it's the responsibility of the curator to do their due research of the artist posting. I shared processed shots out of the recommendation that it was one way to extend the post but by serendipity, I find the method worth it when fishing for curator attention. Compared to a single image that has no explanation whatsoever, over an art shared with some backstory.

I'm not a fan of trying to explain the process because it's the best way to be appreciated but we're just being realistic about trying to fish attention here. :/

Hi @adamada!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your post is eligible for our upvote, thanks to our collaboration with @utopian-io!
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Thank you adamada! You've just received an upvote of 74% by @ArtTurtle!


Learn how I will upvote each and every one of your art and music posts

Please come visit me as I've updated my daily report with more information about my upvote value and how to get the best upvote from me.

Hi, @adamada!

You just got a 0.62% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.

Hi @adamada, your post has been upvoted by @bdcommunity and the trail!

If you want to support us, please consider following our curation trail on Steemauto.com or delegating STEEM POWER to us.

20 SP50 SP100 SP200 SP300 SP500 SP1000 SP

JOIN US ON

Hey, @adamada!

Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!

Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).

Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.

Vote for Utopian Witness!

I didn't even think about this until now, but to be honest, I'm not surprised.

Sadly, when a platform has as much freedom as Steemit, people that steal will always be there to make a quick buck or get some undeserved attention.

They have no morals and they don't really give a crap if they receive compliments or money on someone else's work.

If it wouldn't be for the community, there would be A LOT of profiles on this website full of people sharing content that isn't theirs hoping to make some money.

I can understand why artists would be mad at this. After all, when you spend days, weeks or even months working on a project, seeing that a random guy on a website got more attention with your work than you did, as the original artist, well, can't imagine someone remaining calm.

What would be worse, would be someone with a bunch of followers and a lot of influence, stealing someone else's art, then using their influence to make everyone believe that they're the victim, and that the original artist is actually the thief.

I wouldn't be surprised to see that happen at some point in the future, either on this platform, or somewhere else.

As you said, I think the best way to make sure you can prove you're always the original artist, and to avoid, as best as you can, art theft, is to upload images with the entire process.

If you want to take it to the next step, making sure you can prove you're the original artist by always being able to share extra photos/videos with the process, is a bonus.

For example, if someone would take my my Dark Souls art and would act like he/she is the original artist, I can easily prove that they lie by getting into Blender and literally making a video about how I move through the scene, how I can play with textures, and so on, while they wouldn't be able to.

So I guess having a Photoshop file, or a piece of paper, or something you can use to prove that you're the original artist can be one way to make sure no one steals your art then makes you look like you're the thief.

Nice article, it gave me something to think about and keep and eye out for in the future, when it comes to both my art, and the art other people post on this website.

·

I missed this gem of a reply from the sea of notifications. A lot of stuff happening in real life to keep track of the things I do here. Glad to see this kind of reply once in a while. I think one of the best ways to prove you're the original artist is having a specific style that would be difficulty to copy. I don't know if you're familiar about artists like Wlop and Aoi Ogata but being familiar with their works can make you instantly recognize their style without a watermark.They don't necessarily show their process all the time. They just built a consistent reputation.

·
·

First, thank you for the resteem!

Second, I am familiar with the work of those artists, especially Wlop.

Sadly, while they have a specific style that is easily recognizable, there are a lot of other new artist who aren't as known, who are still experimenting or simply making more and more progress with each piece of art they create, and it's fairly easy to steal work from them saying it's your own.

That's why I think it's always a good idea to have some way to prove that you're the original artist, even if it's something as small as a PSD file or a piece of paper with the original drawing.

I've seen a lot of people stealing art and products, recently from me too, and there's not much you can do about it sometimes. Having proof to show you're the original creator is good in case someone blames you for stealing.