How much 'available' SP is there for Steemit.com content?

in #utopian-io6 years ago (edited)

This analysis is an attempt to uncover the amount of 'available' Steem Power that is there to potentially vote for Steemit.com based content.

Contents

General / Assumptions

  1. Finding the active Steem Power

  2. Removing 'dedicated' Steem Power

  3. Further account exclusions

  4. Summary

  5. Tools used to gather data and compile report



seek.jpg
pixabay source


General / Assumptions

Firstly, it should be stated that the account names that appear in the analysis are free to do as they wish (within their delgators 'rules', if any) with their stake.

For this report, the following criteria has been used to gain a base set of data:

The total Steem Power (including delegated to) is the amount held by every account that has made at least 1 vote in the past 7 days.

The word 'available' is to be used to describe the amount of Steem Power (SP) that is available for free to vote on Steemit.com content.


1. Finding the active Steem Power

The following query was use to list the active voters (voted at least once in the past 7 days) and their available Steem Power.

7 days was chosen as a guide for active voters, and removed accounts such as 'steemit'. If the date was changed assess the previous 31 days the total would be 99,101,480.61 with 'ned' owning 1.8 million of this total.

select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in (select distinct voter from txvotes with (nolock) where timestamp > getdate()-7)

The total is: 93,242,469.69 Steem Power (7 days)


2 Removing 'dedicated' Steem Power

This section is an attempt to remove the Steem Power that is 'assigned' to the various 'projects' on the Steem Blockchain.

Let's start with the easy one.

utopian-io

select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in ('utopian-io')

Total SP: 3,870,935.88

This account has been excluded as votes are given for content produced outside of the steemit.com condenser.


The 'd-apps'

select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in ('dlive',
'dtube',
'dmania',
'dsound')

Total SP: 5,804,473.75

These accounts have been excluded as votes are given for content produced outside of the steemit.com condenser.


Other popular blogging condensers

select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in ('esteemapp',
'busy.pay',
'busy.org')

Total SP: 1,223,248.50

These accounts have been excluded as votes are given for content produced outside of the steemit.com condenser.


The 'cleaners'

select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in ('steemcleaners',
'spaminator',
'blacklist-a',
'guard')

Total SP: 2,832,872.82

These accounts have been excluded as they almost exclusively tackle spam/plagiarism with a negative vote.


'Self-service'

select  sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in ('ranchorelaxo',
'haejin',
'starjuno')

Total SP: 1,417,692.13

These accounts have been excluded due to self-vote percentages above 90%.


The Bid-bots (direct delegations)

The list of accounts used in this query can be found here: https://hackmd.io/s/rygQEFZqG

The syntax of the query below excludes this list for viewing ease.

select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares, len(vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)+
(cast(left(received_vesting_shares, len(received_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000)-
(cast(left(delegated_vesting_shares, len(delegated_vesting_shares)-6) as float)*490.009/1000000))
from accounts with (nolock)
where name in ('BOT LIST GOES HERE')

Total SP: 18,529,234.84

These accounts have been excluded due to the necessity to send a transfer amount for a vote.


What is left available so far?

Excluding the accounts in the set of queries above:

Total Steem Power available: 59,551,529.90

The following Pie chart represents the figures above, which are also listed in the table below.

image.png

image.png

This is an initial attempt to display Steem Power that is both taken, and free for use on Steemit.com.

However, the analyst would like to look at excluding more accounts and Steem Power to try and give a clearer picture of what Steem Power could actually be available.



3. Further account exclusions

There are additional 'pay for vote' services offered by 'randowhale', 'smartmarket', 'minnowbooster', and 'booster' that can access owned Steem Power (not delegated to these accounts) to provide a vote for content when a transfer is made to one of them.

A true reflection of the scale of this is difficult as the owners of this Steem Power can also cast manual 'non-paid' votes when they wish. Therefore it could be argued that the following SP exclusion is unwarranted, and inaccurate. But let's have a look anyway..

A look into the Wallets of the aforementioned accounts shows a number of different payments out to accounts with various default memos.

The following query represents a best guess at the memo used to send to accounts that have made their vested Steem Power available to be used in a 'pay for vote' system.

select distinct [to] from TxTransfers where [from] = 'minnowbooster'
and timestamp between convert(date,'03/15/2018') and convert(date,'03/22/2018')
and (memo like ('%You withdrew%'))
union
select distinct [to] from TxTransfers where [from] = 'smartsteem'
and timestamp between convert(date,'03/15/2018') and convert(date,'03/22/2018')
and memo like '%Automatic%'
union
select distinct [to] from TxTransfers where [from] = 'randowhale'
and timestamp between convert(date,'03/15/2018') and convert(date,'03/22/2018')
and memo like '%[randowhale]%'
union
select distinct [to] from TxTransfers where [from] = 'booster'
and timestamp between convert(date,'03/15/2018') and convert(date,'03/22/2018')
and memo like '%Payment for%'

The memo's analysed are from the previous 7 days and the total Steem Power of the 1794 unique accounts returned is:

Total SP: 6,096,223.49

Again, this is a best guess for purpose of this analysis. At least some of this Steem Power is being used to vote manually and for 'free'.

A look at the top accounts left

If we exclude the accounts in the first section (bid-bots, cleaners, etc) and the accounts in the previous section, who are the accounts left holding the most available Steem Power? And can we exclude any of these also?

The following is a list of the 25 accounts that were not excluded during the analysis above. Notes are given on the decision to include/exclude their Steem Power or not.

image.png


Fig 1:

image.png

Fig 2:

image.png

From: http://www.steemreports.com/votes-graph


And so, if we remove the Steem Power of the accounts with an 'N' in the list above, the total 'available' Steem Power is:

48,671,915.529

Following the additional removal of 'available' Steem Power as explained in this section, the chart now looks like this:

image.png

image.png

With additional accounts removed totalling over 11 million Steem Power, there is still over half of the pool remaining.


4. Summary

The amount of active, free and available Steem Power in this analysis sits at almost 50 million.

Using https://www.steemnow.com/upvotecalc.html to test how much this vote is worth at 100%, and entering the maximum of 10 million SP, the figure returned is $1426.73.

Multiply that by 5 (rounding 48,671,915.529 up) and this is $7133.65

Multiply that by 10 (votes), and ignore the reduction in Steem Power each time for simplicity, and this totals $71,336

There is virtually no accounting for 'high' self voting %'s or direct payment for votes in this analysis, and so one would assume the actual free Steem Power and the above figure is highly likely to be lower.

Thanks for reading, the analyst is not looking forward to questions, but is keen on viewing future work by others in this area.


5. Tools used to gather this data and compile report

The data is sourced from SteemSQL - A publicly available SQL database with all the blockchain data held within.

The SQL queries to extra to the data have been produced in both SQL Server Personal Edition and LINQPAD 5. Some of the code used for these results is as follows:

The charts used to present the data were produced using MS Excel.

This data was compiled on the 22nd March 2018 at 6pm (UCT)



Thanks

Asher @abh12345



Posted on Utopian.io - Rewarding Open Source Contributors

Sort:  

so I have taken your figures and added a little. Below is the SBD and VEST payments claimed on the 1st March. Using http://www.steemdollar.com I have converted these values to STEEM.

Based on this, the available STEEM is 72% of payment claims accepted. A lot higher than I expected
.

I did a report too and got a value very similar to your first chart above where you have 64% available I have 62% for organic votes.

I guess the pond keeps getting smaller and smaller for us fishes to swim around. To that final percentage I believe we still need to consider that even the good whales and dolphins selfvote some times (understandable) so perhaps a fair 10% less of that total amount must be used for whale self vote thus making it unavailable for the community.

"Self service" XD my sides

:D haha

I had to give it some sort of title!

And yeah you are right about taking more out for 'reasonable' self voting. 10% more and we are down to less than 50 cents a post :/

Lol at "self-service"

Also can you make an analysis on how many steemians actually read other peoples post? Is that doable? How many people are just relying on trail votes, etc. I've seen some posts with over 500+votes but with only 30 views. It would be interesting to see how many people took an effort in going someone elses post :)

:D

Views are hard to tally - they don't count across the front ends (busy/esteem/steem etc), and if i refresh this page, another view is added?!

I am not surprised to see bidbots have a large chunk of the SP because of how many whales, dolphins and even minnows delegate to bidbot owners because of up to 95% earnings there.

I used to think that bid bots are evil but in a way I change my thinking that there should be a healthy mix of content creators, curators and investors.

Not everyone has the time to be in the community but the money they invest would make the platform sustainable. So do I condone bots, i do on a certain degree only because if you them as a crutch to earn then you are only deluding yourself because without other votes, without engaging the community and getting influence then you are just operating at a lost.

A lot of the other high SP there are either upvoting a few of their circle of family, friends or selling their votes but there are some individuals who build communities and make it better.

When I made my post on the voting behaviour using the new tool steemocean you clearly the number of votes they do.

I am particularly surprised that major curation guilds like curie and OCD does not delegation when they do so much in raising the quality of the content here. Thank God they have whale benefactors that follow on their trail.

Thanks for reading, the analyst is not is looking forward to questions

Well Asher, you should have tagged me in here somewhere and told me not to read it ;)

I actually understood it haha although I skim past this kind of stuff(select sum((cast(left(vesting_shares), and skip to the explanation and analysis:) Geez, how are bid bots even allowed? I know there's really no one in charge, that's the beauty of it all, but I'm wondering if their purpose was a bit more altruistic in the beginning, or was it always a clever money making scheme masked in helping others? That's pretty harsh, I know, but I'm trying to make a point;)

Also, I think self service should have a way bigger percentage ;)
(yes, that's a joke!)

Cheers! I guess this was the "monster post" you were referring to earlier!

As more and more dApps are created it seems their slice of the pie will continue to shrink.

Will be interesting to see in a year from now how this looks. I have a feeling that pie is going get even smaller for the little guy trying make it on his own.

Community and other platform usage are very important these days to try and get ahead of the curve. It is a bit concerning the amount the bid bots total even more so when you think of the kind of growth they could have in a year from the sales and curation rewards.

That really does not seem like much when you think of all the active users who post a few times a week or more. Mix in with everyone auto upvote and the like.

And that $0.530 is only if every remaining vote is used. A lot of people do not vote. Not sure why, but I have seen people that only vote 2 or 3 times a day, and sit at 100% vote power for multiple days, and not just new users either, minnows on up to whales.

So as you said at "least 1 vote" in a seven day period. I think it is likely higher than that, but is certainly does not even come close to the real total number of votes available per day per account. Can you imagine the conniption fit the self serving whales would have if every non-self serving voter all voted for someone on a Tuesday, and used ten 100% powered votes. The reward pool is based on % after all. And just imagine all the smiles on the newusers, minnows, and dolphins that received those votes .

What I learned today... Find a whale and offer to be slave forever for a good circle jerking. Sooo top-heavy around here.

Also didn't realize Sweet still had massive SP. Is that still from Ned? Or has she just been powering up all the thank you sbd she got along the way?

Interesting approach to look at the available SP, that avoids a couple of hassles. We've tried before with SBD transfers to bid-bots, which turned out to be misleading without the corresponding bot account SP at that time. In combination with @paulag's work I think this gives a pretty good picture of the current state, and it's great to see that the numbers roughly match! Great work!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.12
JST 0.028
BTC 61841.74
ETH 3420.69
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.47